C-271/17 PPU - Zdziaszek, preliminary ruling Rechtbank Amsterdam - Netherlands - Main contents
| Zaak | C-271/17 PPU |
|---|---|
| Vorming van de rechtbank |
|
| Aanvrager | Openbaar Ministerie Defendant: Sławomir Andrzej Zdziaszek Questions referred Are proceedings in which the court in the issuing Member State decides to combine separate custodial sentences which had previously been imposed on the person concerned by a final judgment into one single custodial sentence, and/or to change an aggregate custodial sentence which had previously been imposed on the person concerned by a final judgment and in which that court no longer examines the question of guilt, such as the proceedings which led to the cumulative sentence of 25 March 2014, a ‘trial resulting in the decision’ as referred to in the introductory subparagraph of Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? 1 Can the executing judicial authority: in a case where the requested person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision, but where the issuing judicial authority has not, either in the EAW [European Arrest Warrant] or in the supplementary information requested pursuant to Article 15(2) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, provided information about the applicability of one or more of the circumstances referred to in subparagraphs (a) to (d) of Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, in accordance with the wording of one or more of the categories of point 3 of paragraph (d) of the EAW form, for those very reasons conclude that none of the conditions of Article 4a(1)(a) to (d) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA has been satisfied and for those very reasons refuse to execute the EAW? 3. Are appeal proceedings in which there has been an examination of the merits and which resulted in the passing of a (new) sentence on the person concerned and/or the confirmation of the sentence handed down at first instance, where the EAW concerns the execution of that sentence, the ‘trial resulting in the decision’ as referred to in Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? ____________1 Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1). |
| Verweerder | Sławomir Andrzej Zdziaszek Questions referred Are proceedings in which the court in the issuing Member State decides to combine separate custodial sentences which had previously been imposed on the person concerned by a final judgment into one single custodial sentence, and/or to change an aggregate custodial sentence which had previously been imposed on the person concerned by a final judgment and in which that court no longer examines the question of guilt, such as the proceedings which led to the cumulative sentence of 25 March 2014, a ‘trial resulting in the decision’ as referred to in the introductory subparagraph of Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? 1 Can the executing judicial authority: in a case where the requested person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision, but where the issuing judicial authority has not, either in the EAW [European Arrest Warrant] or in the supplementary information requested pursuant to Article 15(2) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, provided information about the applicability of one or more of the circumstances referred to in subparagraphs (a) to (d) of Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, in accordance with the wording of one or more of the categories of point 3 of paragraph (d) of the EAW form, for those very reasons conclude that none of the conditions of Article 4a(1)(a) to (d) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA has been satisfied and for those very reasons refuse to execute the EAW? 3. Are appeal proceedings in which there has been an examination of the merits and which resulted in the passing of a (new) sentence on the person concerned and/or the confirmation of the sentence handed down at first instance, where the EAW concerns the execution of that sentence, the ‘trial resulting in the decision’ as referred to in Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? ____________1 Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1). |
| Datum indiening verzoekschrift | 18-05-2017 |
| Datum van levering | 10-08-2017 |
This case-file is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned source(s) through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the source(s) we draw our information from nor the resulting case-file is without fault.