Regulation 2006/85 - Definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of farmed salmon from Norway - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 of 17 January 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway| Legal instrument | Regulation |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Regulation 2006/85 |
| Original proposal | COM(2005)688  |
| CELEX number i | 32006R0085 |
| Document | 17-01-2006 |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 20-01-2006; OJ L 334M , 12.12.2008,Special edition in Bulgarian: Chapter 11 Volume 044,OJ L 15, 20.1.2006,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 11 Volume 082,Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 11 Volume 044 |
| Effect | 21-01-2006; Entry into force Date pub. + 1 See Art 3 |
| End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
20.1.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 15/1 |
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 85/2006
of 17 January 2006
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1) (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
-
1.PROCEDURE
1.1. Provisional measures
(1) |
Following the initiation (2) of an anti-dumping investigation on 23 October 2004, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 628/2005 (3), imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway (Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty or provisional Regulation). The provisional anti-dumping duties which took the form of ad valorem duties ranging between 6,8 % and 24,5 % for the imported products applied as of 27 April 2005. |
(2) |
On 1 July 2005, by Regulation (EC) No 1010/2005 (4) (amending Regulation), the Commission changed the form of the provisional measures by replacing the ad valorem duties by a minimum import price (MIP) of EUR 2,81 per kilogram whole fish equivalent (WFE) and extended the duration of the provisional measures for a further three months, by amending the Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty. |
1.2. Subsequent procedure
(3) |
Following the publication of the Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty, parties received disclosure of facts and considerations on which the provisional Regulation was based. Some parties submitted comments in writing. All interested parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission. |
(4) |
Following the publication of the amending Regulation, all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on which the amendment of the provisional Regulation was based. Some parties submitted comments in writing. All interested parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission. |
(5) |
Similarly, all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures and the modalities on the collection of amounts secured by way of provisional duties. They were also granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to this disclosure. |
(6) |
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account for the definitive findings. |
(7) |
The Commission continued to seek all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of its definitive findings. In addition to the verification visits undertaken at the premises of the companies mentioned in recital 7 of the Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty, it should be noted that after the imposition of provisional measures, additional on-spot visits were carried out at the premises of the following Community users and associations of Community users:
|
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing de geconsolideerde versie, the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and finally the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.