Regulation 2005/1175 - Definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate from China - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Regulation (EC) No 1175/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China| Legal instrument | Regulation |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Regulation 2005/1175 |
| Original proposal | COM(2005)279  |
| CELEX number i | 32005R1175 |
| Document | 18-07-2005 |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 21-07-2005; OJ L 164M , 16.6.2006,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 11 Volume 112,Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 11 Volume 041,OJ L 189, 21.7.2005,Special edition in Bulgarian: Chapter 11 Volume 041 |
| Effect | 22-07-2005; Entry into force Date pub. + 1 See Art 3 |
| End of validity | 22-07-2010; See 31996R0384 |
21.7.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 189/15 |
COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1175/2005
of 18 July 2005
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1) (‘the basic Regulation’) and in particular Article 9 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
-
A.PROVISIONAL MEASURES
(1) |
On 29 January 2005, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 145/2005 of 28 January 2005 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China (2) (hereinafter ‘the provisional Regulation’), imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports into the Community of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’). |
-
B.SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE
(2) |
Subsequently to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose the said provisional anti-dumping measures, several interested parties made written submissions containing their views on the provisional findings. No parties requested to be heard. |
(3) |
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for the definitive findings. Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
|
(4) |
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations, on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty. The parties were also granted a period to make representations, subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations. |
(5) |
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly. |
-
C.PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
(6) |
Since no new comments were received regarding the ‘product concerned’ and the ‘like product’, as defined in recitals 11 and 12 of the provisional Regulation, their contents are hereby confirmed. |
-
D.DUMPING
-
1.Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’)
(7) |
In the absence of any comments, the contents of recitals 13 to 23 of the provisional Regulation concerning MET is hereby confirmed. |
-
2.Individual Treatment (‘IT’)
(8) |
In the absence of any comments, the contents of recitals 24 to 29 of the provisional Regulation concerning individual treatment is hereby confirmed. |
-
3.Normal value
(a) Determination of normal value for cooperating producers granted MET
(9) |
For one exporting producer, in determining whether domestic sales were in the ordinary course of trade and also when constructing normal value for certain types of the product concerned, incorrect financing costs were used in calculating the provisional dumping margin. Therefore, for the calculation of the definitive dumping margin, the necessary corrections were... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing de geconsolideerde versie, the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and finally the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.