COM(2006)752-4 - Conclusion of the Protocol between the EU, the EC, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the EU, the EC and Switzerland on Switzerland’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
 
Legal instrument Decision
Decision making procedure non-legislative procedure;Non legislative enactments (NLE)
reference by COM-number125 COM(2006)752 EN
Additional COM-numbers COM(2009)665
procedure number127 2006/0251(NLE)
CELEX number128 52006PC0752(04)

2.

Key dates

Document 01-12-2006
Online publication 01-12-2006
Decision 07-03-2011; Besluit 2011/349

3.

Related information

4.

Resulting legislation

 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 2. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 3. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 4. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 5. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 6. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 7. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 8. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 9. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 10. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 11. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 12. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 13. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 14. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 15. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 16. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 17. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 18. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 19. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 20. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 21. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 22. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 23. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 24. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 25. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 26. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 27. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 28. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 29. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 30. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 31. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 32. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 33. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 34. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 35. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 36. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 37. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 38. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 39. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 40. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 41. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 42. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 43. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 44. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 45. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 46. 
    OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36.

     
  • 47. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 48. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 49. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 50. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 51. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 52. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 53. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 54. 
    If the legal instruments SIS and VIS are not adopted before the signature of the protocol, the article would read as follows: in fulfilling its obligation with regard to the legal instruments establishing the Schengen Information System II and the Visa Information System, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to these systems.

     
  • 55. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 56. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 57. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 58. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 59. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 60. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 61. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 62. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 63. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 64. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 65. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 66. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 67. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 68. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 69. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 70. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 71. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 72. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 73. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 74. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 75. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 76. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 77. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 78. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 79. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 80. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 81. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 82. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 83. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 84. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 85. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 86. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 87. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 88. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 89. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 90. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 91. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 92. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 93. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 94. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 95. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 96. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 97. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 98. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 99. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 100. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 101. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 102. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 103. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 104. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 105. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 106. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 107. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 108. 
    OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36.

     
  • 109. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 110. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 111. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 112. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 113. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 114. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 115. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 116. 
    If the legal instruments SIS and VIS are not adopted before the signature of the protocol, the article would read as follows: in fulfilling its obligation with regard to the legal instruments establishing the Schengen Information System II and the Visa Information System, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to these
     
  • 117. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 118. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 119. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 120. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 121. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 122. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 123. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 124. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 125. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 126. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 127. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 128. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 129. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.
     
  • 130. 
    A decision is legally binding act in its entirety. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, a decision is binding for the EU as a whole. Decisions can address specific legal entities, in which case a decision is binding only to them. In its current form the decision was introduced with the Lisbon Treaty that came into force December 2009. It replaces various legal instruments introduced by earlier Treaties.