COM(2008)332 - Establishment of the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) in application of Article 11 of Framework Decision 2008/XX/JHA

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposal for a Council Decision on the establishment of the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) in application of Article 11 of Framework Decision 2008/XX/JHA
 
Legal instrument Framework decision
Decision making procedure Consultation procedure (CNS)
reference by COM-number84 COM(2008)332 EN
Additional COM-numbers COM(2008)332
procedure number86 2008/0101(CNS)
CELEX number87 52008PC0332

2.

Key dates

Document 27-05-2008
Online publication 27-05-2008
Decision 06-04-2009; Besluit 2009/316
Publication in Official Journal88 07-04-2009; Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 18 Volume 002,OJ L 93, 7.4.2009

3.

Related information

4.

Resulting legislation

 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    In March 2008 BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, LU, SK, SI, PL, PT, UK participated to the pilot project. BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, LU exchanged information electronically.

     
  • 2. 
    Two studies on criminal records, inter alia, were carried out in 2001 and 2002 by the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (ISLA) (Falcone Programme (2000/FAL/168)) and the Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP) (Grotius Programme (2001/GRP/024).

     
  • 3. 
    In March 2008 BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, LU, SK, SI, PL, PT, UK participated to the pilot project. BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, LU exchanged information electronically.

     
  • 4. 
    In March 2008 BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, LU, SK, SI, PL, PT, UK participated to the pilot project. BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, LU exchanged information electronically.

     
  • 5. 
    OJ L58, 24.02.2007

     
  • 6. 
    OJ C
     
  • 7. 
    In March 2008 BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, LU, SK, SI, PL, PT, UK participated to the pilot project. BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, LU exchanged information electronically.

     
  • 8. 
    OJ C
     
  • 9. 
    OJ C
     
  • 10. 
    OJ L58, 24.02.2007

     
  • 11. 
    OJ L
     
  • 12. 
    OJ C 53, 03.03.2005, p.1.

     
  • 13. 
    OJ C 198, 12.8.2005, p. 1.

     
  • 14. 
    OJ L
     
  • 15. 
    OJ C
     
  • 16. 
    In March 2008 BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, LU, SK, SI, PL, PT, UK participated to the pilot project. BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, LU exchanged information electronically.

     
  • 17. 
    OJ C
     
  • 18. 
    OJ L58, 24.02.2007

     
  • 19. 
    OJ L
     
  • 20. 
    OJ C
     
  • 21. 
    See the proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (2002/475/JHA).

     
  • 22. 
    See the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (2002/475/JHA) and Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism of 16 May 2005

     
  • 23. 
    For example rape with particular cruelty.

     
  • 24. 
    Other than incestuous.

     
  • 25. 
    Other than incestuous.

     
  • 26. 
    Other than incestuous.

     
  • 27. 
    For example: credit or insurance fraud.

     
  • 28. 
    Fixed or mobile placement.

     
  • 29. 
    Reapplication in order to obtain a new driving licence is necessary.

     
  • 30. 
    Legal guardian for a person who is legally incompetent or for a minor.

     
  • 31. 
    Fine expressed in daily-units.

     
  • 32. 
    E.g. : for an institution, association, foundation or a victim.

     
  • 33. 
    Military demotion.

     
  • 34. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 35. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 36. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 37. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 38. 
    Situation where a single aggregated penalty covers several criminal acts which have given raise to one or several previous judicial decisions.

     
  • 39. 
    The enforcement of penalty cannot be avoided.

     
  • 40. 
    Non-differentiated appropriations hereafter referred to as NDA.

     
  • 41. 
    Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.

     
  • 42. 
    Expenditure within Article xx 01 04 of Title xx.

     
  • 43. 
    Expenditure within Chapter xx 01 other than Articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.

     
  • 44. 
    See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement.

     
  • 45. 
    OJ C
     
  • 46. 
    Cost of which is included within the reference amount.

     
  • 47. 
    Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.

     
  • 48. 
    OJ C 53, 03.03.2005, p.1.

     
  • 49. 
    OJ C 198, 12.8.2005, p. 1.

     
  • 50. 
    OJ L
     
  • 51. 
    OJ C
     
  • 52. 
    In March 2008 BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, LU, SK, SI, PL, PT, UK participated to the pilot project. BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, LU exchanged information electronically.

     
  • 53. 
    OJ C
     
  • 54. 
    OJ L58, 24.02.2007

     
  • 55. 
    OJ L
     
  • 56. 
    OJ C
     
  • 57. 
    See the proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (2002/475/JHA).

     
  • 58. 
    See the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (2002/475/JHA) and Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism of 16 May 2005

     
  • 59. 
    For example rape with particular cruelty.

     
  • 60. 
    Other than incestuous.

     
  • 61. 
    Other than incestuous.

     
  • 62. 
    Other than incestuous.

     
  • 63. 
    For example: credit or insurance fraud.

     
  • 64. 
    Fixed or mobile placement.

     
  • 65. 
    Reapplication in order to obtain a new driving licence is necessary.

     
  • 66. 
    Legal guardian for a person who is legally incompetent or for a minor.

     
  • 67. 
    Fine expressed in daily-units.

     
  • 68. 
    E.g. : for an institution, association, foundation or a victim.

     
  • 69. 
    Military demotion.

     
  • 70. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 71. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 72. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 73. 
    The enforcement of penalty can be avoided.

     
  • 74. 
    Situation where a single aggregated penalty covers several criminal acts which have given raise to one or several previous judicial decisions.

     
  • 75. 
    The enforcement of penalty cannot be avoided.

     
  • 76. 
    Non-differentiated appropriations hereafter referred to as NDA.

     
  • 77. 
    Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.

     
  • 78. 
    Expenditure within Article xx 01 04 of Title xx.

     
  • 79. 
    Expenditure within Chapter xx 01 other than Articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.

     
  • 80. 
    See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement.

     
  • 81. 
    OJ C
     
  • 82. 
    Cost of which is included within the reference amount.

     
  • 83. 
    Specify the type of committee and the group to which it
     
  • 84. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 85. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 86. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 87. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 88. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.
     
  • 89. 
    This type of legally binding act is no longer used since the Treaty of Lisbon came into force December 2009. A framework decision established objectives the member states had to fulfil. The member states were free to choose the manner to which they would implement the required objectives. The framework decision was exclusively used in the field of justice and home affairs.