Regulation 2025/914 - Amendment of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Regulation (EU) 2025/914 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirementsLegal instrument | Regulation |
---|---|
Number legal act | Regulation 2025/914 |
Regdoc number | PE(2025)12 |
Original proposal | COM(2023)660 ![]() |
CELEX number i | 32025R0914 |
Document | 07-05-2025; Date of signature |
---|---|
Signature | 07-05-2025 |
Effect | 08-06-2025; Entry into force Date pub. +20 See Art 2 01-01-2026; Application See Art 2 |
End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
Official Journal of the European Union |
EN L series |
2025/914 |
19.5.2025 |
REGULATION (EU) 2025/914 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 7 May 2025
amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
After consulting the European Central Bank,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1) |
Reporting requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. It is therefore important to streamline those requirements in order to limit the administrative burden and to ensure that they fulfil the purpose for which they were intended. |
(2) |
Under Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3), all administrators of benchmarks, regardless of the systemic relevance of those benchmarks or the amount of financial instruments or contracts that use those benchmarks as reference rates or as performance benchmarks, are to comply with very detailed requirements, including requirements on their organisation, on governance and conflicts of interest, on oversight functions, on input data, on codes of conduct, on reporting of infringements, and on disclosures related to the methodology used and the benchmark statement. Those requirements have put a disproportionate regulatory burden on administrators of smaller benchmarks in the Union considering the aims of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011, i.e. to safeguard financial stability and to avoid negative economic consequences that result from the unreliability of benchmarks. It is therefore necessary to reduce that regulatory burden by focusing on those benchmarks that have the greatest economic relevance for the Union market, i.e. significant and critical benchmarks, and on those benchmarks that contribute to the promotion of key Union policies, i.e. EU Climate Transition and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks. For that reason, the scope of application of Titles II, III, IV, V and VI of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 should be reduced to those specific benchmarks. However, the specific provisions in Articles 23a, 23b and 23c serve the purpose of ensuring legal certainty and economic stability where a benchmark is being wound down and should therefore remain applicable to all benchmarks. |
(3) |
Administrators that would be excluded from the scope of application of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 following the amendments introduced by this amending Regulation and that wish to opt into the regime should be allowed to make a reasoned request to their competent authority to designate one or more of the benchmarks that they offer as significant. That request should provide the competent authority with sufficient information to assess whether the benchmark meets the requirements for designation as significant under the opt-in regime. Where the information provided in the request is inaccurate or misleading, the authority should refuse to designate the benchmark concerned. Administrators of benchmarks that have been authorised to opt in should comply with all the requirements applicable to administrators of significant benchmarks set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/1011. |
(4) |
Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 empowers the Commission to exempt, under specific conditions, spot foreign exchange benchmarks. To ensure... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.