Regulation 2024/1652 - Amendment of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Regulation (EU) 2024/1652 of 30 May 2024 amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs TariffLegal instrument | Regulation |
---|---|
Number legal act | Regulation 2024/1652 |
Regdoc number | ST(2024)9541 |
Original proposal | COM(2024)148 ![]() |
CELEX number i | 32024R1652 |
Document | 30-05-2024; Date of adoption |
---|---|
Effect | 01-07-2024; Entry into force See Art 2 |
End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
Official Journal of the European Union |
EN L series |
2024/1652 |
10.6.2024 |
COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2024/1652
of 30 May 2024
amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 31 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
Union imports of cereals, oilseeds and derived products as well as beet-pulp pellets and dried peas have significantly increased since the Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. |
(2) |
While the Russian Federation remains a relatively small supplier of cereals, oilseeds and derived products as well as beet-pulp pellets and dried peas to the Union market, it is a leading worldwide producer and exporter of those products. Given its current volumes of exports to the world, the Russian Federation could easily and quickly reorient significant volumes of supplies of those products to the Union, causing a sudden inflow of products from its large existing stocks, thereby disrupting the Union’s market. Moreover, there is evidence that the Russian Federation is currently illegally appropriating large volumes of cereals and oilseeds produced in territories of Ukraine, which it illegally occupies, and routing them to its export markets as allegedly Russian products. |
(3) |
The Union’s erga omnes common customs duties are the currently applied most-favoured-nation (MFN) tariffs on imports of cereals, oilseeds and derived products as well as beet-pulp pellets and dried peas and they differ widely. Depending on the product concerned, those tariffs are either set at zero or very low, or they are already high and no trade takes place. |
(4) |
It is necessary to take appropriate tariff measures in order to prevent cereals, oilseeds and derived products as well as beet-pulp pellets and dried peas originating in the Russian Federation from continuing to enter the Union market on terms that are equally favourable to those applied when those products have other non-preferential origins. Those appropriate tariff measures are expected to contribute to preventing the Russian Federation from directing significant quantities of those products to the Union to politically and economically weaken it, thereby disturbing the Union market, creating societal tensions and frictions within the Union and threatening the proper functioning of the customs union. That threat has been considered pursuant to Article 32, point (d), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and, therefore, measures to avoid serious disturbances in the economies of Member States should be taken under Article 31 thereof. |
(5) |
Appropriate tariff measures should be taken simultaneously in respect of the Republic of Belarus in order to prevent imports to the Union from the Russian Federation being diverted through the Republic of Belarus, given its close political and economic ties with Russia, where Union tariffs on imports of relevant goods from the Republic of Belarus remained unchanged. |
(6) |
Accordingly, imports of cereals, oilseeds and derived products as well as beet-pulp pellets and dried peas originating in or exported directly or indirectly from the Russian Federation or the Republic of Belarus should be subject to higher customs duties than imports from other third countries, whenever the currently applicable customs duties are set at zero or are not sufficiently high. Where those products do not originate in or are not exported directly or indirectly from the Russian Federation or the Republic of Belarus, they should not be subject to those higher customs duties, even when they transit... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.