Decision 2023/1007 - EU position at the sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal with regard to certain amendments of Articles and Annexes in that Convention - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Decision (EU) 2023/1007 of 25 April 2023 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal with regard to certain amendments of Articles and Annexes in that ConventionLegal instrument | Decision |
---|---|
Number legal act | Decision 2023/1007 |
Regdoc number | ST(2023)7759 |
Original proposal | COM(2023)109 ![]() |
CELEX number i | 32023D1007 |
Document | 25-04-2023; Date of adoption |
---|---|
Publication in Official Journal | 24-05-2023; OJ L 136 p. 57-58 |
Effect | 25-04-2023; Entry into force Date of document See Art 3 |
End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
24.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 136/57 |
COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2023/1007
of 25 April 2023
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal with regard to certain amendments of Articles and Annexes in that Convention
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 192(1), in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (1) (‘the Convention’) entered into force in 1992 and was concluded on behalf of the Union by Council Decision 93/98/EEC (2). |
(2) |
In accordance with the Convention, the Conference of the Parties is to consider and adopt, as required, amendments to the Convention and its Annexes. |
(3) |
The Conference of the Parties, during its fifteenth meeting in June 2022, considered a proposal for amendments of Article 6(2) of the Convention submitted by the Russian Federation. That proposal aims to establish a 30 day time limit for State of import to respond to the notifier of a shipment of waste and includes one other change which is presented as being editorial. The Conference of the Parties decided to defer consideration of this proposal to the next meeting of the Conference of the Parties. |
(4) |
A proposal to amend Annex IV and certain entries in Annexes II and IX to the Convention was also submitted on the Union’s behalf and discussed by the Conference of the Parties, during its fifteenth meeting. The proposal aims, inter alia, to amend and to clarify the descriptions of disposal operations listed in Annex IV to the Convention and, in particular, to: include a general introduction clearly distinguishing the terms ‘non-recovery’ and ‘recovery’; include captions and introductory texts that explain the meaning of ‘non-recovery operations’ (Annex IV, Section A) and ‘recovery operations’ (Annex IV, Section B); clarify that all disposal operations that occur or might occur in practice are covered regardless of their legal status and regardless of whether they are considered to be environmentally sound, and that operations that occur prior to the submission to other operations are also covered; update and clarify the descriptions of operations in line with scientific, technical and other developments which have occurred since the Convention was adopted in 1989; and ensure, through the introduction of catch-all provisions, that all operations not specifically mentioned are covered by the Convention’s requirements. The Conference of the Parties decided to further consider this proposal at the next meeting of the Conference of the Parties. |
(5) |
With regard to the proposal for amendments of Article 6(2) of the Convention submitted by the Russian Federation, the Union should not support it, since the amendments would not help to address the problems that the Union considers as priorities for the functioning of the procedure of ‘prior informed consent’ of the Convention. In addition, amendments to the body of the Convention text require a long and arduous process in order to enter into force and it seems disproportionate to launch such a procedure for an amendment that offers little to no added value. |
(6) |
With regard to the proposal to amend Annex IV and certain entries in Annexes II and IX, the Union should continue to support its adoption. With a view to gathering consensus on this proposal, the Union could display flexibility, in particular with regard to the proposed measures that are unlikely to gather... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.