Decision 2021/780 - EU position in the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights of the World Trade Organization - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Decision (EU) 2021/780 of 10 May 2021 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights of the World Trade Organization| Legal instrument | Decision |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Decision 2021/780 |
| Original proposal | COM(2021)183  |
| CELEX number i | 32021D0780 |
| Document | 10-05-2021; Date of adoption |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 12-05-2021; OJ L 167 p. 45-46 |
| Effect | 10-05-2021; Entry into force Date of document See Art 2 |
| End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
12.5.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 167/45 |
COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2021/780
of 10 May 2021
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights of the World Trade Organization
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
The Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, including the Agreements in Annexes 1, 2 and 3 to that Agreement, (‘the Marrakesh Agreement’) was concluded by the Union by Council Decision 94/800/EC (1) and entered into force on 1 January 1995. |
(2) |
Pursuant to Article 66(1) of the Agreement on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (‘the TRIPS Agreement’), included in Annex 1C to the Marrakesh Agreement, the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights of the World Trade Organization (‘the TRIPS Council’) is to, upon duly motivated request by a least-developed country (LDC) Member, accord extensions of the transitional period during which LDC Members are not required to apply the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, other than Articles 3, 4 and 5. |
(3) |
The existing transitional period, as agreed in the Decision of the TRIPS Council of 11 June 2013, is due to expire on 1 July 2021. |
(4) |
On 1 October 2020, Chad, on behalf of the LDC group, formally submitted a request for an extension of the transitional period. |
(5) |
The TRIPS Council, during its formal session on 8 and 9 June 2021, is to adopt a decision regarding the request for an extension of the transitional period under Article 66(1) of the TRIPS Agreement for LDC Members (‘the TRIPS Council’s Decision’). |
(6) |
It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the TRIPS Council, as the TRIPS Council’s Decision will be binding on the Union. |
(7) |
LDC Members represent the most vulnerable segment of the international trade community, facing economic, financial and administrative constraints. LDC Members need to have policy space and flexibility to address their development challenges and further time to implement the TRIPS Agreement. |
(8) |
A certain level of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection and enforcement is beneficial to LDC Members because IPRs are a catalyst for innovation and an important tool for sustainable development. Some LDC Members have already taken steps towards implementation of the TRIPS Agreement and need to be encouraged not to decrease the existing level of IPR protection and enforcement. |
(9) |
An extension of the transitional period without a time limit, as proposed by the LDC group, would slow down the process of gradually integrating LDC Members, as members of the multilateral trading system, in the international IP system on the basis of the minimum requirements provided in the TRIPS Agreement. |
(10) |
Accordingly, it is appropriate to extend the transitional period for the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement, other than Articles 3, 4 and 5, for LDC Members for a limited period of time not exceeding 10 years. |
(11) |
Should Members of the World Trade Organization support the extension of the transitional period under Article 66(1) of the TRIPS Agreement for a longer period or without a time limit, the Union should not stand in the way of reaching a consensus. |
(12) |
The LDCs’ request for an additional period of 12 years exemption calculated from the date on which an LDC Member graduates from the... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.