Implementing regulation 2018/1912 - Amendment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards certain exemptions for intra-Community transactions

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1.

Current status

This implementing regulation has been published on December  7, 2018 and entered into force on December 27, 2018.

2.

Key information

official title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1912 of 4 December 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards certain exemptions for intra-Community transactions
 
Legal instrument Implementing regulation
Number legal act Implementing regulation 2018/1912
Original proposal COM(2017)568 EN
CELEX number i 32018R1912

3.

Key dates

Document 04-12-2018; Date of adoption
Publication in Official Journal 07-12-2018; OJ L 311 p. 10-12
Effect 27-12-2018; Entry into force Date pub. +20 See Art 2
01-01-2020; Application See Art 2
End of validity 31-12-9999

4.

Legislative text

7.12.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/10

 

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1912

of 4 December 2018

amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 as regards certain exemptions for intra-Community transactions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1), and in particular Article 397 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

 

(1)

In its communication of 7 April 2016 on an action plan on VAT, the Commission announced its intention to put forward a proposal for a definitive value added tax (VAT) system in relation to cross-border business-to-business trade between Member States. The Council, in its conclusions of 8 November 2016, invited the Commission to propose in the meantime certain improvements to the Union VAT rules for cross-border transactions, inter alia, for the purposes of exemptions in respect of intra-Community transactions.

 

(2)

Directive 2006/112/EC sets out a number of conditions for the exemption of supplies of goods from VAT in the context of certain intra-Community transactions. One of those conditions is that the goods have to be dispatched or transported from one Member State to another.

 

(3)

However, the divergent approach amongst Member States in the application of those exemptions for cross-border transactions has created difficulties and legal uncertainty for businesses. This is contrary to the objective of enhancing intra-Community trade and to the abolition of the fiscal borders. It is therefore important to specify and harmonise the conditions under which the exemptions can apply.

 

(4)

As cross-border VAT fraud is primarily linked to the exemption for intra-Community supplies, it is necessary to specify certain circumstances in which goods should be considered as having been dispatched or transported from the territory of the Member State of supply.

 

(5)

In order to provide a practical solution for businesses and also to provide assurance for tax administrations, two rebuttable presumptions should be introduced in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 (2).

 

(6)

The call-off stock simplification arrangements should be accompanied by appropriate recording obligations in order to ensure their correct application.

 

(7)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 is amended as follows:

 

(1)

in Chapter VIII, the following Section is inserted:

‘Section 2A

Exemptions for intra-Community transactions

(Articles 138 to 142 of Directive 2006/112/EC)

Article 45a

  • 1. 
    For the purpose of applying the exemptions laid down in Article 138 of Directive 2006/112/EC, it shall be presumed that goods have been dispatched or transported from a Member State to a destination outside its territory but within the Community in either of the following cases:
 

(a)

the vendor indicates that the goods have been dispatched or transported by him or by a third party on his behalf, and either the vendor is in possession of at least two items of non-contradictory evidence referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3 which were issued by two different parties that are independent of each other, of the vendor and of the acquirer, or the vendor is in possession of any single item referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3 together with any single item of non-contradictory evidence referred to in point (b) of paragraph 3 confirming the dispatch or transport which were issued by two different parties that are independent of each...


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

5.

Original proposal

 

6.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

7.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

8.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.