Implementing decision 2018/593 - Authorisation of Italy to derogate from Articles 218 and 232 of the VAT Directive - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/593 of 16 April 2018 authorising the Italian Republic to introduce a special measure derogating from Articles 218 and 232 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added taxLegal instrument | implementing decision |
---|---|
Number legal act | Implementing decision 2018/593 |
Original proposal | COM(2018)55 ![]() |
CELEX number i | 32018D0593 |
Document | 16-04-2018; Date of adoption |
---|---|
Publication in Official Journal | 19-04-2018; OJ L 99 p. 14-15 |
Effect | 19-04-2018; Takes effect Date notif. 01-07-2018; Application See Art 4 |
End of validity | 31-12-2027; Ext. valid. by 32034D3150 |
Notification | 19-04-2018 |
19.4.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 99/14 |
COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2018/593
of 16 April 2018
authorising the Italian Republic to introduce a special measure derogating from Articles 218 and 232 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1), and in particular Article 395(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
By letter registered with the Commission on 27 September 2017, Italy requested authorisation for a special measure to derogate from Articles 218 and 232 of Directive 2006/112/EC and to introduce mandatory electronic invoicing for all taxable persons established in the territory of Italy, except for taxable persons benefiting from the exemption for small enterprises as referred to in Article 282 of that Directive and to channel the invoices through the system ‘Sistema di Interscambio’ (‘the SdI’) managed by the Italian Revenue Agency. |
(2) |
In accordance with Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member States of the request made by Italy by letters dated 3 November 2017 and 6 November 2017. By letter dated 7 November 2017, the Commission notified Italy that it had all the information necessary to consider the request. |
(3) |
Italy submits that the use of mandatory electronic invoicing whereby invoices are submitted by means of the SdI would allow the tax administration in Italy to acquire in real time the information contained in the invoices issued and received by traders. Tax authorities would thus be able to carry out timely and automatic consistency checks between the amounts of VAT declared and paid. |
(4) |
Italy considers that the introduction of a generalised electronic invoicing obligation would help combat fraud and evasion, boost efforts at digitalisation and simplify tax collection. |
(5) |
Italy submits that the groundwork has already been laid for the introduction of mandatory electronic invoicing on the basis of the optional use of the existing SdI system, ensuring a smooth transition to electronic invoicing and at the same time limit the impact of the special measure on taxable persons. |
(6) |
Given the broad scope and the novelty of the special measure, it is important to evaluate the impact of the special measure on combatting VAT fraud and evasion and on taxable persons. Therefore, where Italy considers that the extension of the special measure is necessary, it should submit to the Commission, together with the request for extension, a report including the assessment of the special measure concerning its effectiveness in fighting VAT fraud and evasion and in simplifying tax collection. |
(7) |
This special measure should not affect the right of the customer to receive paper invoices in case of intra-Community transactions. |
(8) |
The special measure requested should be limited in time to allow an assessment of whether the special measure is appropriate and effective in light of its objectives. |
(9) |
The special measure is therefore proportionate to the objectives pursued since it is limited in time and restricted in application as it does not apply to taxable persons who benefit from the exemption for small enterprises referred to in Article 282 of Directive 2006/112/EC. In addition, the special measure does not give rise to the risk that fraud would shift to other sectors or to other Member States. |
(10) |
The special measure will not negatively affect the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.