T-533/17 - Next design+produktion v EUIPO - Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp (nuuna)

1.

Huidige status

Deze zaak is gesloten op 18/10/2018.
 

2.

Kerninformatie

Zaak T-533/17
Vorming van de rechtbank
  • Seventh Chamber
Aanvrager Next design+produktion GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Hirsch, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of ‘nuuna’) -Application for registration No 10 772 606 Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017 in Case R 1448/2016-1 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017; order the defendant to pay the costs. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of Article 1(1) Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of autonomy; Infringement of the principles of legal certainty, legality and sound administration. ____________
Verweerder European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of ‘nuuna’) -Application for registration No 10 772 606 Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017 in Case R 1448/2016-1 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017; order the defendant to pay the costs. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009; Infringement of Article 1(1) Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of autonomy; Infringement of the principles of legal certainty, legality and sound administration. ____________
Datum indiening verzoekschrift 11-08-2017
Datum van levering 18-10-2018

3.

Bronnen en disclaimer

Zie voor uitgebreidere informatie eventueel ook de volgende voor dit zaak-dossier gebruikte bronnen:
This case-file is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned source(s) through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the source(s) we draw our information from nor the resulting case-file is without fault.