C-437/17 - Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach, preliminary ruling Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria

1.

Huidige status

Deze zaak is gesloten op 13/03/2019.
 

2.

Kerninformatie

Zaak C-437/17
Vorming van de rechtbank
  • Fifth Chamber
Aanvrager Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH Defendant: EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH Question referred Are Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 1 on freedom of movement for workers to be interpreted as precluding a national provision such as that in the main proceedings (Paragraph 3(2)(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 3(3) and Paragraph 2(1) of the Urlaubsgesetz (Law on holidays, ‘the UrlG’)), under which a worker who has a total of 25 years of service, but has not completed these with the same Austrian employer, is entitled to only five weeks of annual holiday, whereas a worker who has completed 25 years of service with the same Austrian employer is entitled to six weeks of holiday per year. ____________1 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.
Verweerder EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH Question referred Are Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 1 on freedom of movement for workers to be interpreted as precluding a national provision such as that in the main proceedings (Paragraph 3(2)(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 3(3) and Paragraph 2(1) of the Urlaubsgesetz (Law on holidays, ‘the UrlG’)), under which a worker who has a total of 25 years of service, but has not completed these with the same Austrian employer, is entitled to only five weeks of annual holiday, whereas a worker who has completed 25 years of service with the same Austrian employer is entitled to six weeks of holiday per year. ____________1 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.
Datum indiening verzoekschrift 19-07-2017
Datum van levering 13-03-2019

3.

Bronnen en disclaimer

Zie voor uitgebreidere informatie eventueel ook de volgende voor dit zaak-dossier gebruikte bronnen:
This case-file is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned source(s) through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the source(s) we draw our information from nor the resulting case-file is without fault.