Regulation 2014/543 - Amendment of Council Decision 2005/681/JHA establishing the European Police College (CEPOL) - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Regulation (EU) No 543/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 amending Council Decision 2005/681/JHA establishing the European Police College (CEPOL)| Legal instrument | Regulation |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Regulation 2014/543 |
| Original proposal | COM(2014)7  |
| CELEX number i | 32014R0543 |
| Document | 15-05-2014 |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 29-05-2014; OJ L 163 p. 5-6 |
| Effect | 29-05-2014; Entry into force Date pub. See Art 2 01-09-2014; Application See Art 2 |
| End of validity | 01-07-2016; Repealed and replaced by 32015R2219 |
29.5.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 163/5 |
REGULATION (EU) No 543/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 15 May 2014
amending Council Decision 2005/681/JHA establishing the European Police College (CEPOL)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular point (b) of Article 87(2) thereof,
Having regard to the initiative of Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (1),
Whereas:
(1) |
Pursuant to Article 4 of Council Decision 2005/681/JHA (2), CEPOL has its seat in Bramshill, United Kingdom. |
(2) |
Notwithstanding Article 4 of Decision 2005/681/JHA, by letters dated 12 December 2012 and 8 February 2013, the United Kingdom informed CEPOL that it had unilaterally decided that it no longer wished to host the seat on its territory. In addition to hosting CEPOL, Bramshill also hosts a national police training site of the National Policing Improvement Agency, which the United Kingdom had decided to replace by a new College of Policing to be located elsewhere. The United Kingdom had therefore decided to close the national police training site at Bramshill and to sell the site, indicating that the related costs were high and that no alternative business model to run the site had emerged. In the light of the obligation of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) of sincere cooperation, and in particular the obligations deriving from Article 4 TEU, the Union and its Member States should mutually assist each other in maintaining CEPOL's operational activities. To that end, the United Kingdom in particular is required to ensure a smooth transition of CEPOL to its new location, without jeopardising the regular budget of CEPOL. |
(3) |
In view of the common accord reached on 8 October 2013 by the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, and of the need to maintain CEPOL's status as a separate Union agency, arrangements should be made according to which CEPOL will be hosted in Budapest as soon as it leaves Bramshill. Those arrangements should be incorporated into Decision 2005/681/JHA. |
(4) |
In view of the legal framework introduced by the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, it is necessary to review Decision 2005/681/JHA, while at the same time ensuring CEPOL's status as a separate Union agency. |
(5) |
Decision 2005/681/JHA should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(6) |
Before CEPOL starts its operational phase at the new location, a headquarters agreement should be concluded, pursuant to established procedures. |
(7) |
In accordance with Articles 3 and 4a(1) of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), those Member States have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation. |
(8) |
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application. |
(9) |
In the light of the urgent need to establish the new seat of CEPOL, this Regulation should enter into force on the date of its publication, |
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Decision...
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.