Decision 2011/349 - Conclusion of the Protocol between the EU, the EC, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the EU, the EC and Switzerland on Switzerland’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, relating in particular to judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Current status
  2. Key information
  3. Key dates
  4. Legislative text
  5. Original proposal
  6. Sources and disclaimer
  7. Full version
  8. EU Monitor

1.

Current status

This decision has been published on June 18, 2011 and entered into force on March  7, 2011.

2.

Key information

official title

Council Decision of 7 March 2011 on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, relating in particular to judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation
 
Legal instrument Decision
Number legal act Decision 2011/349
Original proposal COM(2006)752 EN
CELEX number125 32011D0349

3.

Key dates

Document 07-03-2011
Publication in Official Journal 18-06-2011; OJ L 160, 18.6.2011,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 19 Volume 010
Effect 07-03-2011; Entry into force Date of document See Art 5
End of validity 31-12-9999

4.

Legislative text

18.6.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/1

 

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 March 2011

on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, relating in particular to judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation

(2011/349/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 16, 79(2)(c), 82(1)(b) and (d), 87(2), 87(3), 89 and 114 in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

 

(1)

Following the authorisation given to the Presidency, assisted by the Commission, on 27 February 2006, negotiations with the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Swiss Confederation of a Protocol on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis have been finalised.

 

(2)

In accordance with Council Decisions 2008/261/EC (1) and 2008/262/JHA (2), and subject to its conclusion at a later date, the Protocol was signed on behalf of the European Union on 28 February 2008.

 

(3)

As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community.

 

(4)

The Protocol should be approved.

 

(5)

As far as the development of the Schengen acquis is concerned, which falls under Part Three, Title V of the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union, it is appropriate to make Council Decision 1999/437/EC of17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis  (3) applicable, mutatis mutandis, to the relations with Liechtenstein.

 

(6)

The United Kingdom is taking part in this Decision in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and Article 8(2) of Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis  (4).

 

(7)

Ireland is taking part in this Decision in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Protocol on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis  (5).

 

(8)

This Decision does not prejudice the position of Denmark under the Protocol on the Position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession...


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

5.

Original proposal

  • COM(2006)752-4 - Conclusion of the Protocol between the EU, the EC, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the EU, the EC and Switzerland on Switzerland’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
 

6.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:
  • dossier EUR-Lex decision126

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

7.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

8.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.


  • 1. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 2. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 3. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 4. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 5. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 6. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 7. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 8. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 9. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 10. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 11. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 12. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 13. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 14. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 15. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 16. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 17. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 18. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 19. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 20. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 21. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 22. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 23. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 24. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 25. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 26. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 27. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 28. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 29. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 30. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 31. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 32. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 33. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 34. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 35. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 36. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 37. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 38. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 39. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 40. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 41. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 42. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 43. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 44. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 45. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 46. 
    OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36.

     
  • 47. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 48. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 49. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 50. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 51. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 52. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 53. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 54. 
    If the legal instruments SIS and VIS are not adopted before the signature of the protocol, the article would read as follows: in fulfilling its obligation with regard to the legal instruments establishing the Schengen Information System II and the Visa Information System, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to these systems.

     
  • 55. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 56. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 57. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 58. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 59. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 60. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 61. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 62. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 63. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 64. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 65. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 66. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 67. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 68. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 69. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 70. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 71. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 72. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 73. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 74. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 75. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 76. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 77. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 78. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 79. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 80. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 81. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 82. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 83. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 84. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 85. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 86. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 87. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 88. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 89. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 90. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 91. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 92. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 93. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 94. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 95. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 96. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 97. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 98. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 99. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 100. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 101. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 102. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 103. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 104. 
    OJ L 064, 07.03.2002, p.20

     
  • 105. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 106. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 107. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 108. 
    OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36.

     
  • 109. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 110. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 111. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 112. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 113. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 114. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 115. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 116. 
    If the legal instruments SIS and VIS are not adopted before the signature of the protocol, the article would read as follows: in fulfilling its obligation with regard to the legal instruments establishing the Schengen Information System II and the Visa Information System, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to these
     
  • 117. 
    As well as the draft protocol on its accession to the Dublin/Eurodac Agreement with Switzerland and the draft protocol on Denmark's participation in the agreement on Dublin/Eurodac with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

     
  • 118. 
    The same day the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (the
     
  • 119. 
    Article 5 (5) a of the Protocol

     
  • 120. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 121. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 122. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 31.

     
  • 123. 
    OJ L 131, 01.06.2000, p. 43

     
  • 124. 
    OJ L 176 of 10.7.1999, p. 17.

     
  • 125. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 126. 
    EUR-lex provides an overview of the proposal, amendments, citations and legality.