Decision 2011/323 - 2011/323/EU: Council Decision of 19 May 2011 designating the European Capital of Culture for the year 2015 in Czech Republic
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
2011/323/EU: Council Decision of 19 May 2011 designating the European Capital of Culture for the year 2015 in Czech RepublicLegal instrument | Decision |
---|---|
Number legal act | Decision 2011/323 |
Original proposal | COM(2011)115 ![]() |
CELEX number5 | 32011D0323 |
Document | 19-05-2011 |
---|---|
Publication in Official Journal | 01-06-2011; Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 16 Volume 003,OJ L 146, 1.6.2011 |
Effect | 02-06-2011; Entry into force Date pub. +1 See Art 2 |
End of validity | 31-12-9999 |
1.6.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 146/1 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 19 May 2011
designating the European Capital of Culture for the year 2015 in Czech Republic
(2011/323/EU)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 (1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,
Having regard to the Selection Panel report of September 2010 regarding the selection process of the European Capitals of Culture in the Czech Republic,
Whereas:
Considering that the criteria referred to in Article 4 of Decision No 1622/2006/EC are entirely fulfilled,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Plzeň is designated as ‘European Capital of Culture 2015’ in the Czech Republic.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 19 May 2011.
For the Council
The President
CZENE A.
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.
- 1.OJ L 304 of 3.11.2006, p1
- 2.OJ L 304, 3.11.2006, p. 1.
- 3.OJ L 304 of 3.11.2006, p1
- 4.OJ L 304, 3.11.2006, p.
- 5.Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
- 6.EUR-lex provides an overview of the proposal, amendments, citations and legality.