Regulation 2008/71 - Clean Sky Joint Undertaking

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Current status
  2. Key information
  3. Key dates
  4. Legislative text
  5. Original proposal
  6. Sources and disclaimer
  7. Full version
  8. EU Monitor

1.

Current status

This regulation was in effect from February  7, 2008 until June 26, 2014.

2.

Key information

official title

Council Regulation (EC) No 71/2007 of 20 December 2007 setting up the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking (Text with EEA relevance )
 
Legal instrument Regulation
Number legal act Regulation 2008/71
Original proposal COM(2007)315 EN
CELEX number75 32008R0071

3.

Key dates

Document 20-12-2007
Publication in Official Journal 04-02-2008; Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 13 Volume 041,OJ L 30, 4.2.2008
Effect 07-02-2008; Entry into force Date pub. + 3 See Art 18
End of validity 26-06-2014; Repealed by 32014R0558

4.

Legislative text

4.2.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 30/1
 

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 71/2007

of 20 December 2007

setting up the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 171 and 172 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,

Whereas:

 

(1)

Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (1) (hereinafter referred to as the Seventh Framework Programme), provides for a Community contribution to the establishment of long term public private partnerships in the form of Joint Technology Initiatives (hereinafter referred to as JTIs), which could be implemented through Joint Undertakings within the meaning of Article 171 of the Treaty. These JTIs result from the work of European Technology Platforms, already set up under the Sixth Framework Programme, and cover selected aspects of research in their respective fields. They should combine private sector investment and European public funding, including funding from the Seventh Framework Programme.
 

(2)

Council Decision 2006/971/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme ‘Cooperation’ implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) (2) (hereinafter referred to as the Specific Programme Cooperation), underlines the need for ambitious pan-European public-private partnerships to accelerate the development of major technologies by large research actions at Community level including, in particular, JTIs.
 

(3)

The Lisbon Growth and Jobs Agenda underscores the need to develop favourable conditions for investment in knowledge and innovation in Europe with a view to boosting competitiveness, growth and jobs in the European Union.
 

(4)

In its conclusions of 13 May 2003, of 22 September 2003 and of 24 September 2004, the Council highlighted the importance of further developing actions following the 3 % Action Plan for research and the innovation policy, including the development of new initiatives aimed at intensifying cooperation between industry and the public sector in funding research to enhance transnational public-private links.
 

(5)

In its conclusions of 4 December 2006 and of 19 February 2007, the Council and, its conclusions of 8-9 March 2007 the European Council, invited the Commission to submit proposals for the setting up of JTIs for initiatives that have reached an appropriate stage of preparedness.
 

(6)

The Aeronautics European Technology Platform Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe (ACARE) developed a Strategic Research Agenda, which identified as one of its high priorities the reduction of aviation's impact on the environment. It also concluded that technological changes are needed in order to achieve by 2020 the goals of cutting CO2 emissions by 50 %, reducing NOx emissions by 80 %, reducing perceived external noise by 50 %, and making substantial progress in reducing the impact of manufacture, maintenance and disposal of aircrafts and related products on the environment.
 

(7)

The extent of the effort required to address the environmental challenges to the air transport system as defined in the Strategic Research Agenda of ACARE justified the setting up of a Joint Undertaking as the appropriate instrument to coordinate the relevant research activities.
 

(8)

The Clean Sky JTI...


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

5.

Original proposal

 

6.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

7.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the summary of legislation, de geconsolideerde versie, the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and finally the related cases of the European Court of Justice.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

8.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.1.

     
  • 2. 
    OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 86-241.

     
  • 3. 
    9039/03.

     
  • 4. 
    12339/03.

     
  • 5. 
    12487/04.

     
  • 6. 
    COM(2003) 226.

     
  • 7. 
    15717/06.

     
  • 8. 
    6044/07.

     
  • 9. 
    7224/07.

     
  • 10. 
    See COM(2007) 2.

     
  • 11. 
    The European Parliament and European Council in spring 2005 re-affirmed the EU objective of limiting global temperature increase to a maximum of 2°C (the 2° objective).

     
  • 12. 
    Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002 p. 1; corrigendum in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43).

     
  • 13. 
    Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 23 December 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002 p. 72; corrigendum in OJ L 2, 7.12003, p. 39).

     
  • 14. 
    OJ L 312,23.12.1995, p.1.

     
  • 15. 
    OJ L 292,15.11.1996, p.2.

     
  • 16. 
    OJ L 136,31.05.1999, p.1.

     
  • 17. 
    OJ L 357, 31.12.2002 p. 72; corrigendum in OJ L 2, 7.12003, p. 39.

     
  • 18. 
    OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.

     
  • 19. 
    OJ L 264, 25.9.2006, p. 13.

     
  • 20. 
    A 'major' change in budget is seen in the order of 10% of the budget of the ITD affected.

     
  • 21. 
    OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.1.

     
  • 22. 
    OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 86-241.

     
  • 23. 
    9039/03.

     
  • 24. 
    This breakdown of cost distribution is in line with normal practice in aeronautical
     
  • 25. 
    This distribution was obtained using a bottom-up approach, where the budgetary requirements of individual ITDs and the Technology Evaluator were mapped against their technical objectives.

     
  • 26. 
    OJ L 357, 31.12.2002 p. 72; corrigendum in OJ L 2, 7.12003, p. 39.

     
  • 27. 
    Differentiated appropriation.

     
  • 28. 
    Expenditure 08.07.01 01
     
  • 29. 
    Expenditure 08.01.04 60
     
  • 30. 
    Expenditure within chapter 08.07.01 other than articles 08.07.01 01 or 08.01.04 60.

     
  • 31. 
    See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.

     
  • 32. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 33. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 34. 
    Cost of which is included within the reference amount

     
  • 35. 
    The missions of Commission staff assigned to the project will depend on the location of the seat of the Joint Undertaking. It is assumed here that the seat will be in Brussels, and that Executive Board meetings take place at the seat.To calculate the cost of the missions, an average cost of
     
  • 36. 
    Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.

     
  • 37. 
    One interim evaluation and a final evaluation are foreseen, commissioned by Commission services.

     
  • 38. 
    OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.1.

     
  • 39. 
    OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 86-241.

     
  • 40. 
    9039/03.

     
  • 41. 
    12339/03.

     
  • 42. 
    12487/04.

     
  • 43. 
    COM(2003) 226.

     
  • 44. 
    15717/06.

     
  • 45. 
    6044/07.

     
  • 46. 
    7224/07.

     
  • 47. 
    See COM(2007) 2.

     
  • 48. 
    The European Parliament and European Council in spring 2005 re-affirmed the EU objective of limiting global temperature increase to a maximum of 2°C (the 2° objective).

     
  • 49. 
    Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002 p. 1; corrigendum in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43).

     
  • 50. 
    Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 23 December 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002 p. 72; corrigendum in OJ L 2, 7.12003, p. 39).

     
  • 51. 
    OJ L 312,23.12.1995, p.1.

     
  • 52. 
    OJ L 292,15.11.1996, p.2.

     
  • 53. 
    OJ L 136,31.05.1999, p.1.

     
  • 54. 
    OJ L 357, 31.12.2002 p. 72; corrigendum in OJ L 2, 7.12003, p. 39.

     
  • 55. 
    OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.

     
  • 56. 
    OJ L 264, 25.9.2006, p. 13.

     
  • 57. 
    A 'major' change in budget is seen in the order of 10% of the budget of the ITD affected.

     
  • 58. 
    OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.1.

     
  • 59. 
    OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 86-241.

     
  • 60. 
    9039/03.

     
  • 61. 
    This breakdown of cost distribution is in line with normal practice in aeronautical
     
  • 62. 
    This distribution was obtained using a bottom-up approach, where the budgetary requirements of individual ITDs and the Technology Evaluator were mapped against their technical objectives.

     
  • 63. 
    OJ L 357, 31.12.2002 p. 72; corrigendum in OJ L 2, 7.12003, p. 39.

     
  • 64. 
    Differentiated appropriation.

     
  • 65. 
    Expenditure 08.07.01 01
     
  • 66. 
    Expenditure 08.01.04 60
     
  • 67. 
    Expenditure within chapter 08.07.01 other than articles 08.07.01 01 or 08.01.04 60.

     
  • 68. 
    See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.

     
  • 69. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 70. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 71. 
    Cost of which is included within the reference amount

     
  • 72. 
    The missions of Commission staff assigned to the project will depend on the location of the seat of the Joint Undertaking. It is assumed here that the seat will be in Brussels, and that Executive Board meetings take place at the seat.To calculate the cost of the missions, an average cost of
     
  • 73. 
    Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.

     
  • 74. 
    One interim evaluation and a final evaluation are foreseen, commissioned by Commission
     
  • 75. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 76. 
    EUR-lex provides an overview of the proposal, amendments, citations and legality.