COM(2011)216 - Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU CONSEIL mettant en œuvre la coopération renforcée dans le domaine de la création d'une protection par brevet unitaire, en ce qui concerne les modalités applicables en matière de traduction

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU CONSEIL mettant en œuvre la coopération renforcée dans le domaine de la création d'une protection par brevet unitaire, en ce qui concerne les modalités applicables en matière de traduction
 
Legal instrument Regulation
Decision making procedure Consultation procedure (CNS)
reference by COM-number91 COM(2011)216 EN
Additional COM-numbers SEC(2011)483; SEC(2011)482
procedure number93 2011/0094(CNS)
CELEX number94 52011PC0216

2.

Key dates

Document 13-04-2011
Online publication 19-04-2011
Decision 17-12-2012; Verordening 2012/1260
Publication in Official Journal95 31-12-2012; Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 17 Volume 003,OJ L 361, 31.12.2012

3.

Related information

4.

Resulting legislation

 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    www.epo.org

     
  • 2. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 3. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 4. 
    COM(2010) 608 final/2.

     
  • 5. 
    COM(2000) 412.

     
  • 6. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 7. 
    Council document 7159/03.

     
  • 8. 
    COM(2007) 165.

     
  • 9. 
    www.epo.org

     
  • 10. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 11. 
    Council document 17229/09.

     
  • 12. 
    Council document 16113/09 Add 1. The terminology changed (from the 'Community' to 'EU' patent) due to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.

     
  • 13. 
    COM(2010) 350.

     
  • 14. 
    SEC(2010) 796.

     
  • 15. 
    Press Release of the Extraordinary Council meeting 'Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space)', 16041/10, 10.11.2010.

     
  • 16. 
    See press release 17668/10.

     
  • 17. 
    COM(2010) 790.

     
  • 18. 
    Council Decision 2011/167/EU of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 53).

     
  • 19. 
    The consultation document, replies from stakeholders and a report on the preliminary findings of the consultation are available at ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/patent

     
  • 20. 
    COM(2008) 394.

     
  • 21. 
    ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme

     
  • 22. 
    UEAPME Expectations on the Proposal for a European Small Business Act, available at www.ueapme.com. Response to the Consultation on a Small Business Act for Europe, available at www.eurochambres.eu

     
  • 23. 
    Views on key issues of the patent reform debate in Europe, available at www.businesseurope.eu

     
  • 24. 
    Position on the recent policy developments on the European Community patent, available at www.ueapme.com

     
  • 25. 
    Position paper on the European Patent System, available at www.eurochambres.eu

     
  • 26. 
    Position papers from BDI (Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie), DIHK (Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag), CBI (Confederation of British Industries), CCIP (Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Paris), CGPME (Confédération générale des petites et moyennes entreprises), Unioncamere, DigitalEurope, Orgalime, ACT (Association for Competitive Technology), Cefic and others.

     
  • 27. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 28. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 29. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 30. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 31. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 32. 
    OJ, L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 53.

     
  • 33. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 34. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 35. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 36. 
    COM(2010) 350.

     
  • 37. 
    Council documents 15385/10 and 15385/10 ADD 1.

     
  • 38. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 39. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 40. 
    Council Regulation 1/1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385
     
  • 41. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 42. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 43. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 44. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 45. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 46. 
    www.epo.org

     
  • 47. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 48. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 49. 
    COM(2010) 608 final/2.

     
  • 50. 
    COM(2000) 412.

     
  • 51. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 52. 
    Council document 7159/03.

     
  • 53. 
    COM(2007) 165.

     
  • 54. 
    www.epo.org

     
  • 55. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 56. 
    Council document 17229/09.

     
  • 57. 
    Council document 16113/09 Add 1. The terminology changed (from the 'Community' to 'EU' patent) due to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.

     
  • 58. 
    COM(2010) 350.

     
  • 59. 
    SEC(2010) 796.

     
  • 60. 
    Press Release of the Extraordinary Council meeting 'Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space)', 16041/10, 10.11.2010.

     
  • 61. 
    See press release 17668/10.

     
  • 62. 
    COM(2010) 790.

     
  • 63. 
    Council Decision 2011/167/EU of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 53).

     
  • 64. 
    The consultation document, replies from stakeholders and a report on the preliminary findings of the consultation are available at ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/patent

     
  • 65. 
    COM(2008) 394.

     
  • 66. 
    ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme

     
  • 67. 
    UEAPME Expectations on the Proposal for a European Small Business Act, available at www.ueapme.com. Response to the Consultation on a Small Business Act for Europe, available at www.eurochambres.eu

     
  • 68. 
    Views on key issues of the patent reform debate in Europe, available at www.businesseurope.eu

     
  • 69. 
    Position on the recent policy developments on the European Community patent, available at www.ueapme.com

     
  • 70. 
    Position paper on the European Patent System, available at www.eurochambres.eu

     
  • 71. 
    Position papers from BDI (Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie), DIHK (Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag), CBI (Confederation of British Industries), CCIP (Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Paris), CGPME (Confédération générale des petites et moyennes entreprises), Unioncamere, DigitalEurope, Orgalime, ACT (Association for Competitive Technology), Cefic and others.

     
  • 72. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 73. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 74. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 75. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 76. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 77. 
    OJ, L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 53.

     
  • 78. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 79. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 80. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 81. 
    COM(2010) 350.

     
  • 82. 
    Council documents 15385/10 and 15385/10 ADD 1.

     
  • 83. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 84. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 85. 
    Council Regulation 1/1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385
     
  • 86. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 87. 
    European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent (COM(2000) 412 - C5-0461/2000 - 2000/0177(CNS) (OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
     
  • 88. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 89. 
    In order to reduce the costs caused by validation requirements, in 2000 the EPC Contracting States adopted the so-called 'London Agreement' (Agreement on the application of Article 65 EPC, OJ EPO 2001, 550) which is currently in force in eleven EU Member States and results in reduced translation requirements.

     
  • 90. 
    COM(2010) 2020.

     
  • 91. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 92. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 93. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 94. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 95. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.