COM(2001)279-1 - Specific programme 2002-2006 for research, technological development and demonstration aimed at integrating and strengthening the European Research Area
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Proposal for a Council Decision adopting a specific programme 2002-2006 for research, technological development and demonstration aimed at integrating and strengthening the European Research Area| Legal instrument | Decision |
|---|---|
| Decision making procedure | Consultation procedure (CNS) |
| reference by COM-number55 | COM(2001)279  |
| Additional COM-numbers | COM(2001)594; COM(2002)43 |
| procedure number57 | 2001/0122(CNS) |
| CELEX number58 | 52001PC0279(01) |
| Document | 30-05-2001 |
|---|---|
| Online publication | 30-05-2001 |
| Decision | 30-09-2002; Besluit 2002/834 |
This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.
- 1.COM (2001) 94.
- 2.
- 3.SEC (2001)385.
- 4.OJ No.
- 5.OJ No.
- 6.OJ No.
- 7.SEC (2001)385.
- 8.OJ No.
- 9.OJ No
- 10.COM(1999)76.
- 11.Resolution of 20 May 1999, OJ C 201, 16.7.1999.
- 12.Resolution of 3 February 2000, PE 284.656.
- 13.OJL 184, 17.7.1999, p.23
- 14.
- 15.COM (2001) 94.
- 16.OJL 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23
- 17.SEC (2001)385.
- 18.SEC (2001)385.
- 19.In this and other areas of activity within the framework programme, human cloning for reproductive purposes will not be supported; no research activities modifying or aiming to modify the genetic heritage of human beings will be carried out; nor will any research activity involving the creation of a human embryo for research or therapeutic purposes be carried out. As far as possible, animal experiments and testing should be replaced by in vitro or alternative methods. Animal suffering must be avoided or kept to a minimum and, in this regard, special attention must be paid to animal experimentation involving species that are the closest to human beings (in accordance with Directive 86/609/CEE). The modification of the genetic heritage of animals and animal cloning will be envisaged only for objectives that are justified on ethical grounds and when carried out under conditions respecting animal welfare and the principles of genetic diversity.
- 20.Causes, clinical manifestation, consequences and treatment of disease and disorders often differ between women and men. Therefore, all activities funded within this thematic priority must take the possibility of gender differences into account in their research protocols, methodologies and analysis of results.
- 21.The activity on satellite communications is done in coordination with the activities in priority 4 'aeronautics and space'.
- 22.Considering the tight links between communications satellites and terrestrial technologies, the related work is presented in the context of the relevant actions of the 'Information society technologies' thematic priority area.
- 23.COM(2001)31.
- 24.COM(2000)769.
- 25.As well as the funding of national programmes carried out by several Member States in accordance with Article 169 of the Treaty.
- 26.1998 figure.
- 27.COM (2000) 6 of 18 January 2000 COM (2000) 612 of 4 October 2000
- 28.COM (2001) 94.
- 29.
- 30.SEC (2001)385.
- 31.OJ No.
- 32.OJ No.
- 33.OJ No.
- 34.SEC (2001)385.
- 35.OJ No.
- 36.OJ No
- 37.COM(1999)76.
- 38.Resolution of 20 May 1999, OJ C 201, 16.7.1999.
- 39.Resolution of 3 February 2000, PE 284.656.
- 40.OJL 184, 17.7.1999, p.23
- 41.
- 42.COM (2001) 94.
- 43.OJL 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23
- 44.SEC (2001)385.
- 45.SEC (2001)385.
- 46.In this and other areas of activity within the framework programme, human cloning for reproductive purposes will not be supported; no research activities modifying or aiming to modify the genetic heritage of human beings will be carried out; nor will any research activity involving the creation of a human embryo for research or therapeutic purposes be carried out. As far as possible, animal experiments and testing should be replaced by in vitro or alternative methods. Animal suffering must be avoided or kept to a minimum and, in this regard, special attention must be paid to animal experimentation involving species that are the closest to human beings (in accordance with Directive 86/609/CEE). The modification of the genetic heritage of animals and animal cloning will be envisaged only for objectives that are justified on ethical grounds and when carried out under conditions respecting animal welfare and the principles of genetic diversity.
- 47.Causes, clinical manifestation, consequences and treatment of disease and disorders often differ between women and men. Therefore, all activities funded within this thematic priority must take the possibility of gender differences into account in their research protocols, methodologies and analysis of results.
- 48.The activity on satellite communications is done in coordination with the activities in priority 4 'aeronautics and space'.
- 49.Considering the tight links between communications satellites and terrestrial technologies, the related work is presented in the context of the relevant actions of the 'Information society technologies' thematic priority area.
- 50.COM(2001)31.
- 51.COM(2000)769.
- 52.As well as the funding of national programmes carried out by several Member States in accordance with Article 169 of the Treaty.
- 53.1998 figure.
- 54.COM (2000) 6 of 18 January 2000 COM (2000) 612 of 4 October 2000
- 55.De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
- 56.De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
- 57.Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
- 58.Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
- 59.Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.
- 60.This type of legally binding act is no longer used since the Treaty of Lisbon came into force December 2009. It, together with various other legal instruments, was replaced by a new version of the decision. The old decision addressed specific legal entities (citizens, organisations or member states). The decision was only binding to those it addressed.