COM(2006)569 - Road infrastructure safety management

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

This Directive71 is drafted by the Directorate-General Mobility and Transport (MOVE)72 of the European Commission and submitted to the Council of the European Union on October 5, 2006 and for codecision73 to the European Parliament.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on road infrastructure safety management
 
Legal instrument Directive
Decision making procedure ordinary legislative procedure (COD)
reference by COM-number74 COM(2006)569 EN
Additional COM-numbers SEC(2006)1232; SEC(2006)1231
procedure number76 2006/0182(COD)
CELEX number77 52006PC0569

2.

Key dates

Document 05-10-2006
Online publication 05-10-2006
Decision 19-11-2008; Richtlijn 2008/96
Publication in Official Journal78 09-07-2019; OJ L 319, 29.11.2008,OJ L 183 p. 59-67

3.

Related information

4.

Resulting legislation

 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    Commission White Paper of 12 September 2001:
     
  • 2. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 3. 
    Commission Recommendation of 2003 on enforcement in the field of road safety , OJ 111 of 17 April 2004, p. 75

     
  • 4. 
    Commission Communication of 22 February 2006:
     
  • 5. 
    European Transport Safety Council, 1997, Road Safety audit and safety impact assessment, p. 11

     
  • 6. 
    ROSEBUD is an acronym for Road safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making. Among the ROSEBUD partners are road research institutes from 11 Member States as well as from Israel and Norway partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/

     
  • 7. 
    Calculation for EU25 plus Bulgaria, Romania and Switzerland

     
  • 8. 
    The procedures put forward in the present directive were recommended by the High Level Group on Road Safety, established by the Commission to assist it in developing a European Road Safety Policy and in coordinating national policies. The Final Report on
     
  • 9. 
    This section reads:
     
  • 10. 
    Commission White Paper of 12 September 2001:
     
  • 11. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 12. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 13. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 14. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 15. 
    OJ L 228, 9.9. 19968ALO, p.1. Decision as last amended by Decision 884/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 167, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

     
  • 16. 
    COM(2001) 370 final

     
  • 17. 
    OJ L 167, 30.4.2004, p. 39.

     
  • 18. 
    OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.23. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11).

     
  • 19. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 20. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 21. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 22. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 23. 
    Commission White Paper of 12 September 2001:
     
  • 24. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 25. 
    ROSEBUD is an acronym for Road safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making. Among the ROSEBUD partners are road research institutes from 11 Member States as well as from Israel and Norway partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/

     
  • 26. 
    Non-differentiated appropriations hereafter referred to as NDA

     
  • 27. 
    Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.

     
  • 28. 
    Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx.

     
  • 29. 
    Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.

     
  • 30. 
    See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.

     
  • 31. 
    If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the 'Relevant comments' section of this point

     
  • 32. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 33. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 34. 
    Cost of which is included within the reference amount

     
  • 35. 
    Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.

     
  • 36. 
    Commission White Paper of 12 September 2001:
     
  • 37. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 38. 
    Commission Recommendation of 2003 on enforcement in the field of road safety , OJ 111 of 17 April 2004, p. 75

     
  • 39. 
    Commission Communication of 22 February 2006:
     
  • 40. 
    European Transport Safety Council, 1997, Road Safety audit and safety impact assessment, p. 11

     
  • 41. 
    ROSEBUD is an acronym for Road safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making. Among the ROSEBUD partners are road research institutes from 11 Member States as well as from Israel and Norway partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/

     
  • 42. 
    Calculation for EU25 plus Bulgaria, Romania and Switzerland

     
  • 43. 
    The procedures put forward in the present directive were recommended by the High Level Group on Road Safety, established by the Commission to assist it in developing a European Road Safety Policy and in coordinating national policies. The Final Report on
     
  • 44. 
    This section reads: ' The network must (a) ensure the sustainable mobility of persons and goods within an area without internal frontiers under the best possible social and safety conditions
     
  • 45. 
    Commission White Paper of 12 September 2001:
     
  • 46. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 47. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 48. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 49. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 50. 
    OJ L 228, 9.9. 19968ALO, p.1. Decision as last amended by Decision 884/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 167, 30.4.2004, p.

    1).

     
  • 51. 
    COM(2001) 370 final

     
  • 52. 
    OJ L 167, 30.4.2004, p. 39.

     
  • 53. 
    OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.23. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11).

     
  • 54. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 55. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 56. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 57. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 58. 
    Commission White Paper of 12 September 2001:
     
  • 59. 
    European Parliament Resolution A5-0381/2000 of 18 January 2001

     
  • 60. 
    ROSEBUD is an acronym for Road safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making. Among the ROSEBUD partners are road research institutes from 11 Member States as well as from Israel and Norway partnet.vtt.fi/rosebud/

     
  • 61. 
    Non-differentiated appropriations hereafter referred to as NDA

     
  • 62. 
    Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.

     
  • 63. 
    Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx.

     
  • 64. 
    Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.

     
  • 65. 
    See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.

     
  • 66. 
    If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the 'Relevant comments' section of this point

     
  • 67. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 68. 
    Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount

     
  • 69. 
    Cost of which is included within the reference amount

     
  • 70. 
    Specify the type of committee and the group to which it
     
  • 71. 
    This legally binding act of the European Union establishes a set of objectives which all member states of the European Union must fulfil. The member states are required to implement directives. The member states are free to choose the manner they see fit to fulfil the required objectives.
     
  • 72. 
    This Directorate-General develops the EU-policy regarding transport and mobility and is responsible for the programmes that financially support trans-European networks, technological development and innovation.
     
  • 73. 
    This procedure is the standard decision-making procedure used in the European Union, unless the treaties specifically state one of the special legislative procedures is to be applied to a particular subject. Before the Treaty of Lisbon came into force late 2009 it was referred to as the co-decision procedure. The essential characteristic of this procedure is that both the Council of Ministers as well as the European Parliament have a deciding vote in the legislative process, and both institutions may amend a proposal.
     
  • 74. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 75. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 76. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 77. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 78. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.