COM(2000)468 - Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise
 
Legal instrument Directive
Decision making procedure ordinary legislative procedure (COD)
reference by COM-number89 COM(2000)468 EN
Additional COM-numbers SEC(2001)892; COM(2001)621
procedure number91 2000/0194(COD)
CELEX number92 52000PC0468

2.

Key dates

Document 26-07-2000
Online publication 26-07-2000
Decision 25-06-2002; Richtlijn 2002/49
Publication in Official Journal93 18-07-2002; Special edition in Estonian: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Polish: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Slovenian: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Slovak: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 15 Volume 008,Special edition in Maltese: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Bulgarian: Chapter 15 Volume 008,OJ L 189, 18.7.2002,Special edition in Czech: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 15 Volume 031,Special edition in Hungarian: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Latvian: Chapter 15 Volume 007,Special edition in Lithuanian: Chapter 15 Volume 007

3.

Related information

  • Explanatory memorandum
  • Considerations
  • Legal provisions
  • Annexes

4.

Resulting legislation

  • Richtlijn 2002/49 - Assessment and management of environmental noise - Declaration by the Commission in the Conciliation Committee on the Directive relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise
 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament), consultations relevant to the dossier at hand and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.


  • 1. 
    Green Paper on Future Noise Policy (COM(96) 540 final).

     
  • 2. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 3. 
    'Exposure-response relations for transportation noise', H.M.E. Miedema and H. Vos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (6), December 1998, p. 3432 -3444.

     
  • 4. 
    'Noise Exposure and Public Health', W. Passchier-Vermeer and W.F. Vermeer, Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 108, Supplement 1, March 2000.

     
  • 5. 
    'Study related to the preparation of a communication on a future EC Noise Policy, Final Report', J. Lambert and M. Vallet, LEN Report No 9420, December 1994.

     
  • 6. 
    'Green Paper on Future Noise Policy' and a DG Environment 'Priority Study' based on data from the literature.

     
  • 7. 
    COM(1999) 640/3.

     
  • 8. 
    Decision No 2179/98/EC of 24 September 1998.

     
  • 9. 
    Directive 96/62/EC on ambient air quality assessment and management; OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p. 55.

     
  • 10. 
    Motor vehicles and their exhaust systems (70/157/EEC, 73/350/EEC, 77/212/EEC, 81/334/EEC, 84/372/EEC, 84/424/EEC, 89/491/EEC, 92/97/EEC, 96/20/EC, 1999/101/EC); Two and three wheel vehicles and their exhaust systems (70/157/EEC. 96/20/EC); Agricultural tractors (74/151/EEC, 82/890/EEC, 88/410/EEC, 97/54/EC, 98/38/EC); Aircraft (80/51/EC, 89/629/EEC, 92/14/EEC); Construction plant and equipment (79/113/EEC); Compressors (84/533/EEC); Tower cranes (84/534/EEC); Welding generators (84/535/EEC); Generators (84/536/EEC); Hand-held concrete-breakers and picks (84/537/EEC); Lawnmowers (84/538/EEC); Hydraulic excavators, rope-operated excavators, dozers, loaders and excavator-loaders (86/662/EEC).

     
  • 11. 
    'Cost study on noise mapping and action planning', COWI report P-44581-W, 1999.

     
  • 12. 
    Position paper on EU Noise Indicators, 27 August 1999.

     
  • 13. 
    ISO/TC43/SC1/WG49.

     
  • 14. 
    According to the 1999 progress report of Working Group 'Computation and Measurement' One of those requirements is that a change in the character of the sources (other type of cars, other type of aircraft) does not interfere with the quality of the transmission model. Another requirement is higher accuracy for the prediction of screening (as introduced by noise barriers), for meteorological influences, for hilly surroundings and various other situations. The working group has started the process that should lead to the development of such methods. That development will take a considerable time (at least four years). For these recommended existing methods the Commission is following the advice of Working Group 3, as given in its position paper on interim computation methods (to be published July/Aug 2000). The Commission should make these methods available in an appropriate form.

     
  • 15. 
    ISO 1996-2:1987 and ISO 1996-1: 198/2.

     
  • 16. 
    Member States and other stakeholders have clearly indicated that there is a need for further standardisation in this area. That could for example be provided in the form of European Standards that are applied on a voluntary basis. The Commission has asked a working group to prepare a position paper on this issue.

     
  • 17. 
    Position Paper on the interim computation and measurement methods, to be published in July/August 2000.

     
  • 18. 
    Green Paper on Future Noise Policy (COM(96) 540 final).

     
  • 19. 
    OJ C

     
  • 20. 
    OJ C

     
  • 21. 
    OJ C

     
  • 22. 
    OJ C

     
  • 23. 
    COM(96) 540 final, 4.11.1996.

     
  • 24. 
    OJ C 200, 30.6.1997, p. 28.

     
  • 25. 
    COM(1999) 640.

     
  • 26. 
    OJ L 137, 24.5.1986, p. 28.

     
  • 27. 
    OJ L 131, 5.5.1998, p. 11.

     
  • 28. 
    OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12.

     
  • 29. 
    OJ L 220, 30.8.1993, p. 1.

     
  • 30. 
    OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

     
  • 31. 
    'Exposure-response relations for transportation noise', H.M.E. Miedema and H. Vos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (6), December 1998, p. 3432 -3444.

     
  • 32. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 33. 
    OJ L 162, 3.7.2000, p. 1.

     
  • 34. 
    'Green Paper on Future Noise Policy' and a DG Environment 'Priority Study' based on data from the literature.

     
  • 35. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 36. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 37. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 38. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 39. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 40. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 41. 
    'Study related to the preparation of a communication on a future EC Noise Policy, Final Report', J. Lambert and M. Vallet, LEN Report No 9420, December 1994.

     
  • 42. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 43. 
    'Exposure-response relations for transportation noise', H.M.E. Miedema and H. Vos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (6), December 1998, p. 3432 -3444.

     
  • 44. 
    Directive 96/62/EC OJ No L296, 21.11.96, p. 55.

     
  • 45. 
    Green Paper on Future Noise Policy (COM(96) 540 final).

     
  • 46. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 47. 
    'Exposure-response relations for transportation noise', H.M.E. Miedema and H. Vos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (6), December 1998, p. 3432 -3444.

     
  • 48. 
    'Noise Exposure and Public Health', W. Passchier-Vermeer and W.F. Vermeer, Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 108, Supplement 1, March 2000.

     
  • 49. 
    'Study related to the preparation of a communication on a future EC Noise Policy, Final Report', J. Lambert and M. Vallet, LEN Report No 9420, December 1994.

     
  • 50. 
    'Green Paper on Future Noise Policy' and a DG Environment 'Priority Study' based on data from the literature.

     
  • 51. 
    COM(1999) 640/3.

     
  • 52. 
    Decision No 2179/98/EC of 24 September 1998.

     
  • 53. 
    Directive 96/62/EC on ambient air quality assessment and management; OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p. 55.

     
  • 54. 
    Motor vehicles and their exhaust systems (70/157/EEC, 73/350/EEC, 77/212/EEC, 81/334/EEC, 84/372/EEC, 84/424/EEC, 89/491/EEC, 92/97/EEC, 96/20/EC, 1999/101/EC); Two and three wheel vehicles and their exhaust systems (70/157/EEC. 96/20/EC); Agricultural tractors (74/151/EEC, 82/890/EEC, 88/410/EEC, 97/54/EC, 98/38/EC); Aircraft (80/51/EC, 89/629/EEC, 92/14/EEC); Construction plant and equipment (79/113/EEC); Compressors (84/533/EEC); Tower cranes (84/534/EEC); Welding generators (84/535/EEC); Generators (84/536/EEC); Hand-held concrete-breakers and picks (84/537/EEC); Lawnmowers (84/538/EEC); Hydraulic excavators, rope-operated excavators, dozers, loaders and excavator-loaders (86/662/EEC).

     
  • 55. 
    'Cost study on noise mapping and action planning', COWI report P-44581-W, 1999.

     
  • 56. 
    Position paper on EU Noise Indicators, 27 August 1999.

     
  • 57. 
    ISO/TC43/SC1/WG49.

     
  • 58. 
    According to the 1999 progress report of Working Group 'Computation and Measurement' One of those requirements is that a change in the character of the sources (other type of cars, other type of aircraft) does not interfere with the quality of the transmission model. Another requirement is higher accuracy for the prediction of screening (as introduced by noise barriers), for meteorological influences, for hilly surroundings and various other situations. The working group has started the process that should lead to the development of such methods. That development will take a considerable time (at least four years). For these recommended existing methods the Commission is following the advice of Working Group 3, as given in its position paper on interim computation methods (to be published July/Aug 2000). The Commission should make these methods available in an appropriate form.

     
  • 59. 
    ISO 1996-2:1987 and ISO 1996-1: 198/2.

     
  • 60. 
    Member States and other stakeholders have clearly indicated that there is a need for further standardisation in this area. That could for example be provided in the form of European Standards that are applied on a voluntary basis. The Commission has asked a working group to prepare a position paper on this issue.

     
  • 61. 
    Position Paper on the interim computation and measurement methods, to be published in July/August 2000.

     
  • 62. 
    Green Paper on Future Noise Policy (COM(96) 540 final).

     
  • 63. 
    OJ C

     
  • 64. 
    OJ C

     
  • 65. 
    OJ C

     
  • 66. 
    OJ C

     
  • 67. 
    COM(96) 540 final, 4.11.1996.

     
  • 68. 
    OJ C 200, 30.6.1997, p. 28.

     
  • 69. 
    COM(1999) 640.

     
  • 70. 
    OJ L 137, 24.5.1986, p. 28.

     
  • 71. 
    OJ L 131, 5.5.1998, p. 11.

     
  • 72. 
    OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12.

     
  • 73. 
    OJ L 220, 30.8.1993, p. 1.

     
  • 74. 
    OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

     
  • 75. 
    'Exposure-response relations for transportation noise', H.M.E. Miedema and H. Vos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (6), December 1998, p. 3432 -3444.

     
  • 76. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 77. 
    OJ L 162, 3.7.2000, p. 1.

     
  • 78. 
    'Green Paper on Future Noise Policy' and a DG Environment 'Priority Study' based on data from the literature.

     
  • 79. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 80. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 81. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 82. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 83. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 84. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 85. 
    'Study related to the preparation of a communication on a future EC Noise Policy, Final Report', J. Lambert and M. Vallet, LEN Report No 9420, December 1994.

     
  • 86. 
    'Guidelines for Community Noise', WHO, 2000.

     
  • 87. 
    'Exposure-response relations for transportation noise', H.M.E. Miedema and H. Vos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (6), December 1998, p. 3432 -3444.

     
  • 88. 
    Directive 96/62/EC OJ No L296, 21.11.96, p. 55.

     
  • 89. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 90. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 91. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 92. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 93. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.
     
  • 94. 
    This legally binding act of the European Union establishes a set of objectives which all member states of the European Union must fulfil. The member states are required to implement directives. The member states are free to choose the manner they see fit to fulfil the required objectives.