Regulation 1983/3186 - Opening, allocation and administration of a Community tariff quota for frozen cod (Gadus morhua) fillets falling within subheading ex 03.01 B II b) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff (1984) - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3186/83 of 4 November 1983 opening, allocating and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for frozen cod (Gadus morhua) fillets falling within subheading ex 03.01 B II b) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff (1984)| Legal instrument | Regulation |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Regulation 1983/3186 |
| Original proposal | COM(1983)546  |
| CELEX number i | 31983R3186 |
| Document | 04-11-1983 |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 12-11-1983; OJ L 311 p. 4-6 |
| Effect | 01-01-1984; Entry into force See Art 10 |
| Deadline | 05-10-1984; See Art 6 |
| End of validity | 31-12-1984; See Art. 1 |
|
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3186/83 of 4 November 1983 opening, allocating and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for frozen cod (Gadus morhua) fillets falling within subheading ex 03.01 B II b) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff (1984)
Official Journal L 311 , 12/11/1983 P. 0004 - 0006
*****
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 3186/83
of 4 November 1983
opening, allocating and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for frozen cod (Gadus morhua) fillets falling within subheading ex 03.01 B II b) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff (1984)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Whereas the Community has undertaken to open an annual Community tariff quota at 8 % duty for 10 000 tonnes of frozen cod (Gadus morhua) fillets falling within subheading ex 03.01 B II b) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff; whereas the tariff quota concerned should be opened on 1 January 1984 and allocated between the Member States;
Whereas, under Article 64 of the 1979 Act of Accession, Greece is required to apply in full the Common Customs Tariff duty in respect of the product in question as from 1 January 1981; whereas, therefore, as from that date, it is necesary to cover, in favour of the tariff quotas in question, the requirements of that Member State during the quota period;
Whereas equal and continuous access to the quota should be ensured for all Community importers and the rate of levy for the tariff quota should be applied consistently to all imports until the quota is used up; whereas, in the light of the principles outlined above, a Community tariff arrangement based on an allocation between the Member States would seem to preserve the Community nature of the quota; whereas, to represent as closely as possible the actual development of the market in the said goods, the allocation should follow proportionately the requirements of the Member States calculated both from statistics of imports from third countries during a representative reference period and according to the economic outlook for the tariff year in question;
Whereas, during the last three years for which complete statistics are available, the corresponding imports into each of the Member States represented the following percentages of total imports of the product in question:
1.2.3.4 // // // // // Member States // 1980 // 1981 // 1982 // // // // // Benelux // 0,52 // 2,40 // 1,57 // Denmark // 4,99 // 6,34 // 1,25 // Germany // 23,18 // 20,64 // 27,79 // Greece // 0 // 0,36 // 1,22 // France // 15,30 // 2,60 // 9,43 // Ireland // 0 // 0 // 0 // Italy // 10,78 // 6,03 // 3,44 // United Kingdom // 45,50 // 61,63 // 55,30 // // // //
Whereas, in view of these factors and of market forecasts for this product for 1984, the initial percentage shares in the quota volume can be expressed approximately as follows:
Benelux 0,42
Denmark 8,55
Germany 30,80
Greece 0,09
France 17,11
Ireland 0,09
Italy 0,17
United Kingdom 42,77
Whereas, to take account of future import trends for the products in question in the various Member States, the quota should be divided into two instalments, the first being allocated among Member States and the second held as a reserve to cover subsequently the requirements of Member States which have exhausted their initial share; whereas, to give importers in each Member State some degree of certainty, the first instalment of the Community quota should be fixed at a relatively high level, in this case approximately 58 % of the full quota;
Whereas Member States may exhaust their initial shares for the products in question at different rates; whereas, to avoid disruption of supplies on this account, it should be provided that any Member State which has almost used up its initial share should draw...
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.