The Europeanisation of the Rhineland: the Netherlands and Germany in transnational perspective
The European Union has been shaped by its member states. 'Brussels' is a mirror of national political cultures. Also, the integration process has led to an adaptation of governance and politics of the member states to EU legislation. This research project focuses on the effects of the European membership, the European legislation and the European agreements on socio-economic and constitutional relations and on party-politics in the Netherlands and Germany.
The vertical and horizontal transformation processes will be studied in a transnational perspective, which means that in addition to the bilateral state relations, also the regional, multilateral and supranational relations are taken into account. From this perspective, the Rhineland could be considered as one borderless region. Of course, differences between the Netherlands and Germany will also be regarded.
This project is an initiative by the Amsterdam Institute for German Studies of the University of Amsterdam and the Montesquieu Institute in The Hague. Besides research activities international conferences will be held concerning the regulated free market economy (the Rhineland Model), the Dutch and German constitutions and the translation and transposition of political concepts within the EU. The project is led by Hanco Jürgens, MA, Research Coordinator at the Amsterdam Institute for German Studies.
Contents
In february 2011 the Montesquieu Institute Maastricht and the Duitsland Instituut Amsterdam hosted a conference on the constitutional consequences of European integration in Germany and the Netherlands. Learn more about this conference1.
Learn more about the international series of conferences2 on Market & Morality in April and May 2009.
This paper compares the Dutch and German political debates on the future of the EU. In Germany, future prospects of the EU are well discussed by all political parties. Since the interests of the various stakeholders, particularly of the German Houses of Parliament, are well defined and defended, the public debate is less capricious than in the Netherlands.
This paper discusses the European integration process from the perspective of the Dutch and German constitutional cultures in a transnational perspective, taking each others and the wider European perspective into account.
This paper analyzes how public images and self-images of the social welfare state are important for the political identity of states and explores how social debate about the crisis of the welfare state led to a feeling of identity loss and how this identity could be regained.
- 1.On Thursday the 24th and Friday the 25th of February, the Maastricht branch of the Montesquieu Institute and the Amsterdam Institute for German studies (DIA) hosted a conference on the constitutional consequences of European integration in Germany and the Netherlands.
- 2.In the Spring of 2009 the Montesquieu Institute, in collaboration with the Amsterdam Institute for German Studies and others, organised a series of conferences on the question of morality in the current market. During three conferences this topic, which has become increasingly relevant due to the current financial crisis, was examined.
- 3.Hanco Jürgens is onderzoeker bij het Duitsland Instituut. Jürgens is historicus van huis uit, en is vooral geïnteresseerd in de dynamiek van maatschappelijke veranderingen. In 2014 promoveerde hij aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Momenteel richt Jürgens zich op Europeanisering in Nederland en Duitsland, en de politiek in brede zin.