Annexes to COM(2023)126 - Amendment of Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

agreements (such as the CBE Agreement of the Salzburg Forum) would be unable to reach the same level of effectiveness as the Directive in both ending the impunity of non-resident offenders and ensuring equal treatment of all road users. The evaluation of the Directive has shown that if Member States wanted to achieve the same results through the conclusion of bilateral agreements, hundreds of these agreements would have to be signed, resulting in huge complexity and possible inconsistencies, and ultimately leading to significant costs for national administrations. The added value of EU action can therefore also be seen from the efficiency angle, considering that a single framework provides for higher efficiency.

The shortcomings of the current Directive – in particular its lack of effectiveness – can only be addressed by an action at EU level. Only an EU instrument can bring about consistent and efficient EU-wide cross-border enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules.

1.5.3.Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past

The evaluation of the current Directive found that it had a positive impact on removing the anonymity of offenders who committed a road-safety-related traffic offence abroad, as an increasing number of road-safety-related traffic offences committed by non-residents have been investigated over time. However, the measures of the current Directive were inadequate to remove their impunity. In 2015, around 50% of detected road-safety-related traffic offences committed by non-residents were not investigated and around 50 % of the financial penalties for those offences that had been investigated were not successfully enforced. Almost all offences where offenders refused to pay financial penalties were not enforced, i.e. successfully enforced penalties were essentially due to voluntary payments.

The difficulties in cooperation between Member States in investigating road-safety-related traffic offences and enforcement of sanctions after exchanging vehicle registration data, especially where different legal liability regimes are applied, is the main explanation for this. Nevertheless, such cooperation appeared successful between Member States which concluded bilateral or multilateral agreements complementing EU law.

1.5.4.Compatibility with the Multiannual Financial Framework and possible synergies with other appropriate instruments

The proposed revision of the CBE Directive is consistent with other EU road safety legislation. It refers to Council Directive 1999/37/EC on the registration documents for vehicles in what concerns the classification of vehicle registration data elements; it extends the scope of the CBE Directive to the offence of using overloaded vehicle, therefore having a close link to the application of Council Directive 96/53/EC on maximum authorised weights and dimensions of vehicles; it complements the Driving Licence Directive by allowing the use of personal data from driving licence registers for the cross-border investigation of road-safety-related traffic offences, informing offenders on applied sanctions affecting their right to drive and identifying the person liable for road-safety-related offences. The proposal is also consistent with a wider set of existing legal instruments and ongoing initiatives at Union level in the field of police and justice cooperation, which have to be taken into account in relation to this initiative, such as existing cross-border investigation procedures under the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union, the European Investigation Order and the Prüm Decisions which are currently being revised.

To ensure a consistent approach in the cross-border enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules, a negotiating package is established, which consists of three initiatives – besides this proposal for a directive amending the CBE Directive, it also contains a proposal for a new driving licence directive (replacing Directive 2006/126/EC on driving licences and a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Union-wide effect of certain driving disqualifications.

1.5.5.Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for redeployment

The one-off costs in 2025 and ongoing adjustment costs of the Commission until 2050 are mainly related to the establishment of the IT system to support interactions between governmental authorities/organisations, natural and legal persons in cross-border administrative and criminal proceedings. The information functionality of the dedicated IT portal will build on the existing portal managed by the Commission (Going Abroad) and the upgrade of this system would present the best use of the current organisation and invested resources up to now. The establishment of the IT system does not require an increase of human resources.


1.6.Duration and financial impact of the proposal/initiative

◻ limited duration

–◻    in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY

–◻    Financial impact from YYYY to YYYY for commitment appropriations and from YYYY to YYYY for payment appropriations.

X unlimited duration

–Implementation with a start-up period from 2025 to 2027,

–followed by full-scale operation.

1.7.Method(s) of budget implementation planned 74  

X Direct management by the Commission

–◻ by its departments, including by its staff in the Union delegations;

◻ Shared management with the Member States

◻ Indirect management by entrusting budget implementation tasks to:

–◻ third countries or the bodies they have designated;

–◻ international organisations and their agencies (to be specified);

–◻ the EIB and the European Investment Fund;

–◻ bodies referred to in Articles 70 and 71 of the Financial Regulation;

–◻ public law bodies;

–◻ bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the extent that they are provided with adequate financial guarantees;

–◻ bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are entrusted with the implementation of a public-private partnership and that are provided with adequate financial guarantees;

–◻ bodies or persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in the CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU, and identified in the relevant basic act.

–If more than one management mode is indicated, please provide details in the ‘Comments’ section.

Comments

The implementation of the proposal requires the establishment and maintenance of a new IT system. This system should connect existing networks of national IT systems and interoperable access points, operating under the individual responsibility and management of each Member State, to ensure a secure and reliable cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences. The Commission will define appropriate IT solutions in implementing acts, including the design/architecture and technical specifications for a dedicated digital portal and electronic systems (interface platform(s)) to inter-connect national systems to exchange the information, which Member States can choose to use. The adjustment costs for the Commission are expected to consist of three main cost elements (calculated in present net value), as follows:

- the non-recurring adjustment (one off) costs in 2025 incurred by the exchange of information between Member States concerning the verification of the information letter and follow-up documents through the dedicated IT portal estimated at 405 000 €;

- non-recurring adjustment (one-off) costs of 70 000 € are foreseen in 2025 incurred by the establishment of the dedicated IT portal;

- ongoing adjustment costs (development, maintenance and support of the dedicated IT portal) estimated at approx. 50 000 € per year intended for more interactive exchange of information between Member States enforcement and citizens/road users authorities not just about applicable road-safety-related traffic rules in place (existing Going Abroad website of the Commission), but also about applicable sanction schemes and appeal procedures.


2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES 

2.1.Monitoring and reporting rules 

Specify frequency and conditions.

The tasks directly implemented by DG MOVE will follow the annual cycle of planning and monitoring, as implemented in the Commission and the executive agencies, including reporting the results through the Annual Activity Report of DG MOVE.

The Commission will monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the application of the initiative/intervention through reporting of specific indicators (Article 6 of the proposal) that includes for example the number of automated outgoing/inbound requests conducted by the Member State in which the offence was committed and addressed to the Member State of the vehicle registration, or the number of registered road-safety-related traffic offences which are detected automatically or without the identification of the liable person on the spot and committed with vehicles registered abroad, or on the number of automatic checking equipment (e.g. speed cameras), or on voluntarily paid financial penalties by non-residents.

The new reporting period of Member States is extended from current two years to four years aligning it with the Commission’s evaluation calendar and reducing the administrative burden on national authorities. The IT platform(s) are intended to facilitate automatic compilation of data by specific reporting features.

2.2.Management and control system(s) 

2.2.1.Justification of the management mode(s), the funding implementation mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed

The unit within DG MOVE in charge of the policy field will manage the implementation of the Directive, in cooperation with other relevant units and DGs.

The expenditure will be implemented under direct management, in full application of the provisions of the Financial Regulation. The control strategy for procurements and grants in DG MOVE includes specific ex-ante legal, operational and financial controls on the procedures (including, for procurements, a review by the advisory committee for procurement and contracts) as well as on the signature of contracts and agreements. In addition, expenditure made to procure goods and services is subject to ex-ante and, when necessary, ex-post and financial controls.

2.2.2.Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up to mitigate them

Very low risk. The dedicated IT portal will build on the existing Going Abroad website ( https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/going_abroad/index_en.htm ) and will be upgraded to become more interactive and provide additional functionalities. The identified risks are linked to the use of procurement procedures: delay, availability of data, timely information to the market, etc. These risks are covered under the Financial Regulation and mitigated by the set of internal controls deployed by DG MOVE for procurement of this value.

2.2.3.Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio of "control costs ÷ value of the related funds managed"), and assessment of the expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure) 

The requested budgetary increase applies to the establishment and maintenance of the IT system. Concerning the control activities related to the IT systems developed or managed by the directorate responsible for the proposal, the IT steering committee is regularly monitoring the directorate databases and progress made, taking into account the simplification and cost-efficiency of the Commission IT resources.

DG MOVE reports annually, in its Annual Activity Report, on the cost of control of its activities. The risk profile and cost of controls for procurement activities are in line with the requirements.

2.3.Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities 

Specify existing or envisaged prevention and protection measures, e.g. from the Anti-Fraud Strategy.

The regular Commission prevention and protection measures would apply, specifically:

- payments for any services are checked by the Commission staff prior to payment, taking into account any contractual obligations, economic principles and good financial or management practice. Anti-fraud provisions (supervision, reporting requirements, etc.) will be included in all agreements and contracts concluded between the Commission and recipients of any payments;

- to combat fraud, corruption and other unlawful activities the provisions of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) shall apply without restriction.

DG MOVE adopted a revised Anti-fraud Strategy (AFS) in 2020. The MOVE AFS is based on the Commission Antifraud Strategy and a specific risk assessment carried out internally to identify the areas most vulnerable to fraud, the controls already in place and the actions necessary to improve DG MOVE’s capacity to prevent, detect and correct fraud.

The contractual provisions applicable to public procurement ensure that audits and on-the-spot checks can be carried out by the Commission services, including OLAF, using the standard provisions recommended by OLAF.

3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 

3.1.Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 

·Existing budget lines

In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial frameworkBudget lineType of
expenditure
Contribution
NumberDiff./Non-diff. 75from EFTA countries 76from candidate countries and potential candidates 77fromother third countriesother assigned revenue
0102 20 04 01Diff.NONONONO

·New budget lines requested

In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial frameworkBudget lineType of
expenditure
Contribution
NumberDiff./Non-diff.from EFTA countriesfrom candidate countries and potential candidatesfrom other third countriesother assigned revenue
[XX.YY.YY.YY]YES/NOYES/NOYES/NOYES/NO

3.2.Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations 

3.2.1.Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations 

–◻    The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations

–X    The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below. No additional appropriations will be necessary. The amounts needed to finance the project will be redeployed from the appropriations already programmed in the official financial programming under the specific budget items.

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Heading of multiannual financial
framework
01Single Market, Innovation and Digital

DG: MOVEYear
2025 78
Year
2026
Year
2027
Year
2028
Year

2029+

TOTAL

(2025 – 2050)
• Operational appropriations
Budget line 79 02 20 04 01Commitments(1a)0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments(2a)0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Budget lineCommitments(1b)
Payments(2b)
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes 80  

Budget line(3)
TOTAL appropriations
for DG MOVE
Commitments=1a+1b +30.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments=2a+2b

+3
0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531


• TOTAL operational appropriations
Commitments(4)0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments(5)0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
• TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes
(6)0.051
TOTAL appropriations
under HEADING 1
of the multiannual financial framework
Commitments=4+ 60.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments=5+ 60.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531

If more than one operational heading is affected by the proposal / initiative, repeat the section above:

TOTAL operational appropriations (all operational headings)Commitments(4)0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments(5)0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes (all operational headings)
(6)
TOTAL appropriations
under HEADINGS 1 to 6
of the multiannual financial framework
(Reference amount)
Commitments=4+ 60.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments=5+ 60.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531


Heading of multiannual financial
framework
7‘Administrative expenditure’

This section should be filled in using the 'budget data of an administrative nature' to be firstly introduced in the Annex to the Legislative Financial Statement (Annex 5 to the Commission decision on the internal rules for the implementation of the Commission section of the general budget of the European Union), which is uploaded to DECIDE for interservice consultation purposes.

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
2025
Year
2026
Year
2027
Year
2028
Year

2029+
TOTAL

2025- - 2050
DG: <…….>
• Human resources
• Other administrative expenditure
TOTAL DG <…….>Appropriations

TOTAL appropriations
under HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework 
(Total commitments = Total payments)

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
2025
Year
2026
Year
2027
Year
2028
Year

2029+
TOTAL

2025-- 2050
TOTAL appropriations
under HEADINGS 1 to 7
of the multiannual financial framework 
Commitments0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531
Payments0.5250.0500.0510.0510.0511.531


3.2.2.Estimated output funded with operational appropriations 

Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)

Indicate objectives and outputs



Year
N
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)TOTAL
OUTPUTS
Type 81

Average costNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostTotal NoTotal cost
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1 82
- Output
- Output
- Output
Subtotal for specific objective No 1
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 2 ...
- Output
Subtotal for specific objective No 2
TOTALS

3.2.3.Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations 

–X    The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations of an administrative nature

–◻    The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an administrative nature, as explained below:

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
N 83
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)TOTAL

HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework
Human resources
Other administrative expenditure
Subtotal HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework

Outside HEADING 7 84
of the multiannual financial framework

Human resources
Other expenditure
of an administrative nature
Subtotal
outside HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework

TOTAL

The appropriations required for human resources and other expenditure of an administrative nature will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.

3.2.3.1.Estimated requirements of human resources

–X    The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources.

–◻    The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below:

Estimate to be expressed in full time equivalent units

Year
N
Year
N+1
Year N+2Year N+3Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)
• Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff)
20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices)
20 01 02 03 (Delegations)
01 01 01 01  (Indirect research)
01 01 01 11 (Direct research)
Other budget lines (specify)
• External staff (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE) 85

20 02 01 (AC, END, INT from the ‘global envelope’)
20 02 03 (AC, AL, END, INT and JPD in the delegations)
XX 01 xx yy zz   86

- at Headquarters

- in Delegations
01 01 01 02 (AC, END, INT - Indirect research)
01 01 01 12 (AC, END, INT - Direct research)
Other budget lines (specify)
TOTAL

XX is the policy area or budget title concerned.

The human resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.

Description of tasks to be carried out:

Officials and temporary staff
External staff

3.2.4.Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework 

The proposal/initiative:

–X    can be fully financed through redeployment within the relevant heading of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF).

Amounts needed to finance the project will be redeployed from budget line 02.200401..

–◻    requires use of the unallocated margin under the relevant heading of the MFF and/or use of the special instruments as defined in the MFF Regulation.

Explain what is required, specifying the headings and budget lines concerned, the corresponding amounts, and the instruments proposed to be used.

–◻    requires a revision of the MFF.

Explain what is required, specifying the headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.

3.2.5.Third-party contributions 

The proposal/initiative:

–X    does not provide for co-financing by third parties

–◻    provides for the co-financing by third parties estimated below:

Appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
N 87
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)Total
Specify the co-financing body 
TOTAL appropriations co-financed


3.3.Estimated impact on revenue 

–X    The proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.

–◻    The proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:

–◻    on own resources

–◻    on other revenue

–please indicate, if the revenue is assigned to expenditure lines ◻    

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Budget revenue line:Appropriations available for the current financial yearImpact of the proposal/initiative 88
Year
N
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)
Article ………….

For assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.


Other remarks (e.g. method/formula used for calculating the impact on revenue or any other information).


(1) OJ L 68, 13.3.2015, p. 9
(2) COM(2001) 370 final
(3) COM(2010) 389 final
(4) During the first lockdown in April 2020, the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) reported a 70-85% reduction in traffic volumes in major European cities (https://etsc.eu/covid-19-huge-drop-in-traffic-in-europe-but-impact-on-road-deaths-unclear/)
(5) See: https://eumos.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Valletta_Declaration_on_Improving_Road_Safety.pdf; in June 2017, the Council adopted conclusions on road safety endorsing the Valletta Declaration (see document 9994/17).
(6) SWD(2019) 283 final
(7) COM(2020) 789 final
(8) Initiative No 26 in Annex II to COM(2021) 645 final
(9) P9_TA(2021)0407 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0407_EN.pdf
(10) The Commission’s “Going Abroad” website: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/going_abroad/index_en.htm
(11) SEC(2008) 351.
(12) SWD(2016) 355 final
(13) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1) and Directive (EU) 2016/680 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p.89).
(14)

   OJ L 403, 30.12.2006, p. 18

(15)

   OJ L 138, 1.6.1999, p. 57

(16) Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorized dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorized weights in international traffic (OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 59).
(17) Council Act of 29 May 2000 establishing in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union, (OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, p. 1).
(18) Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (OJ L 130, 1.5.2014, p. 1).
(19)

   COM(2021) 784 final

(20) Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (OJ L 76, 22.3.2005, p. 16).
(21) Regulation (EU) 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73).
(22) Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 1).
(23)

   Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 80).

(24) Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 1).
(25) Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 1).
(26) Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty (OJ L 294, 6.11.2013, p. 1).
(27) Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ L 65, 11.3.2016, p. 1).
(28) Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings (OJ L 132, 21.5.2016, p. 1).
(29) Directive (EU) 2016/1919 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings (OJ L 297, 4.11.2016, p. 1).
(30) Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 1).
(31) COM(2020) 262 final
(32) COM(2021) 759 final
(33) COM(2022) 720 final
(34) Directive 2011/82/EU facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (OJ L 288, 5.11.2011, p. 1).
(35) Case C-43/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:298
(36)

   SWD (2016) 355 final; the evaluation was supported by a study of external consultants - Grimaldi Studio Legale (2016), ISBN 978-92-79-59136-5

(37) COM (2016) 744 final
(38) Impact assessment support study for the revision of Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences, ECORYS consortium (2023), MOVE/C2/SER/2019-425/SI2.819667
(39) https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/2131-Cross-border-enforcement-of-road-traffic-rules_en 
(40) RSB/RM/cdd - rsb(2022)5013941
(41) The portal is intended to serve as single point of contact (SPOC) or single European electronic access point for the cross-border enforcement of road-safety-related traffic rules.
(42) The decentralised nature of the system means that there would be no data storage or data processing by the entity entrusted with the operational management of the system’s components. Depending on whether an access point to the system is operated by an EU institution, agency or body, or at national/international level, and depending on which national authorities are processing personal data and for what purposes, either Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39); Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1); or Directive (EU) 2016/680 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89), would apply.
(43) The multilateral CBE Agreement of the Salzburg Forum has been signed by Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary and Austria on 11 October 2012. It uses the framework established by the CBE Directive and also includes cooperation in the cross-border investigation of road traffic offences ( http://www.salzburgforum.org/Treaties_and_Agreement/CBE_Agreement.html ) .
(44) https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11 
(45) https://www.roadsafetysweden.com/contentassets/b37f0951c837443eb9661668d5be439e/stockholm-declaration-english.pdf 
(46)

   Commission Work Programme 2022, Annex II (REFIT initiatives), heading ‘A New Push for European Democracy’

(47) COM(2021) 118
(48) https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/justice-programme_en 
(49) OJ C , , p. .
(50) OJ C , , p. .
(51) SWD(2019) 283 final
(52) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future’, COM(2020) 789 final.
(53) Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences (OJ L 68, 13.3.2015, p. 9).
(54) Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (OJ L 76, 22.3.2005, p. 16).
(55) Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (OJ L 130, 1.5.2014, p. 1).
(56) OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, p. 3.
(57) Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 1).
(58) Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ L 142, 1.6.2012, p. 1).
(59) Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty (OJ L 294, 6.11.2013, p. 1).
(60) Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ L 65, 11.3.2016, p. 1).
(61) Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings (OJ L 132, 21.5.2016, p. 1).
(62) Directive (EU) 2016/1919 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings, (OJ L 297, 4.11.2016, p. 1).
(63) Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA, (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).
(64) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
(65) COM(2020) 262 final
(66) Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
(67) Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (NIS 2 Directive), (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022).
(68) OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
(69) COM(2022) 720 final
(70) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
(71) Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC, (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
(72) OJ C 369, 17.12.2011, p. 14.
(73) As referred to in Article 58(2)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.
(74) Details of budget implementation methods and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on the BUDGpedia site: https://myintracomm.ec.europa.eu/corp/budget/financial-rules/budget-implementation/Pages/implementation-methods.aspx
(75) Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. = Non-differentiated appropriations.
(76) EFTA: European Free Trade Association.
(77) Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidates from the Western Balkans.
(78) Year 2025 is the year in which implementation of the proposal/initiative starts.
(79) According to the official budget nomenclature.
(80) Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
(81) Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.: number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
(82) As described in point 1.4.2. ‘Specific objective(s)…’
(83) Year N is the year in which implementation of the proposal/initiative starts. Please replace "N" by the expected first year of implementation (for instance: 2021). The same for the following years.
(84) Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
(85) AC= Contract Staff; AL = Local Staff; END= Seconded National Expert; INT = agency staff; JPD= Junior Professionals in Delegations.
(86) Sub-ceiling for external staff covered by operational appropriations (former ‘BA’ lines).
(87) Year N is the year in which implementation of the proposal/initiative starts. Please replace "N" by the expected first year of implementation (for instance: 2021). The same for the following years.
(88) As regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 20 % for collection costs.