Annexes to COM(2021)213 - European Structural and Investment Funds 2014-2020 2020 Summary report of the programme annual implementation reports covering implementation in 2014-2019

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Annex 3 provides details on the Funds’ climate allocation and spending.

There are important differences in the financial progress across the different themes. Climate change adaptation and risk prevention is one of the fastest progressing thematic objectives in terms of the amounts already spent by beneficiaries. On the other hand, investments in the low-carbon economy are lagging behind due to a very slow start in the early years of the programming period, which has not been made up yet by the acceleration recorded in the past three years. This is due to the large share of ESI Funds supporting infrastructure investments, such as energy efficiency in buildings, renewable energy, smart distribution electricity grids or sustainable urban transport, where the project implementation cycle tends to be longer.

Until the end of 2019, the following tangible achievements were recorded:

· renewable energy production capacity will be enlarged by 5800 MW (81% of the target), of which 2100 MW has already been installed, almost double compared to the capacity installed by end-2018;

·the energy performance of 598 000 households (96% of the target) will improve; as many as 285 000 households were already benefitting from the improved conditions by the end of 2019, which is 100 000 more than by end-2018;

·the energy consumption of public buildings will be reduced annually by 6.1 terawatt-hours (92% of the target), of which 1.2 terawatt-hours have already been saved annually, doubling the achievement compared to end-2018;

·21 million people will benefit from an improved water supply (overperforming already the target by 80%), of which 2.5 million people already benefit from it (double compared to the achievement until end-2018);

·flood protection measures will reduce the vulnerability of almost 40 million people (161% of the target), of which 7.5 million are not exposed to flood risks any longer due to investments supported by ESI Funds;

·clean urban transport projects delivered 102 km of new or improved tram and metro lines (21% of the target) with an additional 400 km in projects under implementation;

·through better management of agricultural and forest land, the EU has reached 99% of its 2023 EAFRD targets with respect to the carbon sequestration and conservation as well as the reduction of greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions in agriculture.

·40% of the EMFF support provided to the fisheries and aquaculture sectors under the thematic objective “Preserving and protecting the environment and promoting resource efficiency” has been committed to preserving and protecting the environment, for example through the protection of Natura 2000 areas, and to promoting resource efficiency and reducing waste.

Box 3: Examples of ESI Funds contributing to sustainable growth

• In the Czech city of Zlín, an ERDF grant of €3 million funded the purchase of seven new trolleybuses with an innovative on-board battery system to operate along a newly extended transport route in the city. Thanks to the batteries, the buses can travel up to 12 kilometres beyond the normal trolley routes, enabling more inhabitants of the city to use this safe and green mode of transport.

•In Ireland, the Mary Elmes Bridge delivers much needed multi-modal access across the River Lee in the heart of Cork City. The bridge promotes greener transport by providing pedestrian and cycle access between two significant parts of the city for up to 11 000 people daily. The project benefited from a €1.5 million ERDF grant.

•In Varna, Bulgaria, the EMFF supported Lavrak. Ltd, a fisheries company, in investing to improve the financial and environmental sustainability of their fishing activities. It is a family-run business from fishing to sales, marketing and communication. The EMFF has been there along the way to help them scale up and to support them through the COVID-19 pandemic.

•A project in Slovenia took nature-friendly vine cultivation on a family farm a step further with EAFRD support to develop zero-waste processing methods that use all by-products of grapes in a sustainable and fully circular way. The resulting seeds, oil and flour have proved very popular with customers. Vineyards are cultivated free of herbicides and with a minimal use of insecticides. The winemaking process produces 0% waste thanks to circular practices and new product development.

3.3.Inclusive growth: employment, social inclusion and education

The EU continues to give a decisive impulse to its social agenda, in particular since the adoption of the European Pillar of Social Rights. In this context, the ESI Funds have underpinned structural reforms, including the modernisation of public services, encouraging youth employment, reducing poverty and inequalities and addressing the issue of gender equality as well as social inclusion aspects such as homelessness and housing exclusion.

Over €174 billion is planned in this area, particularly from the ESF. By the end of 2019, projects selected for support accounted for €123 billion or 85% of the total allocation, and overall spending was €57.5 billion or 40% of the planned total.

Financial implementation (in % of total amount planned)


Total amount planned (EU + national, €billion)


Sustainable & Quality Employment


Social Inclusion


Educational & Vocational Training

Allocated to projects

Spent by projects


€49 billion worth of projects were selected to improve employment opportunities and resulted in 36.4 million participants supported by the ESF and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), including nearly 14.6 million unemployed and 13.9 million inactive participants. By the end of 2019, 4.5 million people had found a job thanks to ESF and YEI support.

Among these participants, those with low skills represent 49% of all individuals; 15% were migrants, had a foreign background or were from minorities. The participation of women and men in ESF supported activities is almost equally distributed at EU level (52% are women). The increase in the number of ESF and YEI participants since end-2016 clearly indicates a sharp acceleration in the implementation of projects on the ground.

Investments in employment are performing well. In addition to the ESF, the YEI has continued to provide substantial funding support to young people in the eligible Member States. The YEI shows good progress, with €10.4 billion having been allocated to 227 000 projects by the end of 2019. The expenditure declared shows solid implementation on the ground; by end-2019 around 3 million young people had been included in YEI-supported measures:

·about 2 million participants had completed the YEI intervention;

·over 900 000 participants had been offered either a job, continued education, an apprenticeship or training; and

·about 1.4 million participants, who were in education or training, had gained a qualification or were in employment, including self-employment.

For social inclusion, to which the ESF is the biggest contributor, the projects selected so far represent almost €57 billion. By end-2019, thanks to ESF support, 2.5 million participants with disabilities, 5.6 million migrants, participants with a foreign background or minorities and 6.5 million other disadvantaged people had received help to improve their employment opportunities and develop the right skills for the jobs market.

For education and training, €41.8 billion had been committed to concrete projects. By end-2019, thanks to ESF support, 17.8 million low-skilled people had been helped, 5.5 million had gained a qualification and 1.8 million were in education and training.

As a result of ERDF support, the capacity of childcare and education infrastructure was enlarged for 15 million people (8.7 million more than at end-2018), and 39 million people now benefit from improved health services across the EU (11.3 million more than at end-2018).

The EAFRD supported over 63 000 operations enhancing social inclusion in rural areas. It also provided support to local rural communities implementing their own local development strategies. Nearly 3 500 Local Action Groups cover over 60% of the rural population in the EU and bring together public, private and civil-society stakeholders in a particular area.

Box 4: Examples of ESI Funds contributing to inclusive growth

•In Belgium, faced with COVID-19, the Creative Industries Knowledge Centre, Technocité, near Mons in Wallonia, set up virtual classes so participants could continue their training courses. Some €3.3 million from the ESF have allowed teachers and students to pursue their courses at the Technocité skills centre. Training courses focus on topics such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, Internet of things, sound design, etc. The ESF is also supporting ‘Stuyfplek’, a network encouraging the personal growth of disadvantaged people and persons with disability to help them find a job. The project, which has received €377 000 of EU funding, has been rapidly adapted to find new ways of training and interacting with online sessions and training during the coronavirus crisis.

•In Spain, with a €47 million budget, the ‘Empleaverde’ project, co-financed by the ESF, is creating green jobs, promoting entrepreneurship and helping to build a fairer, greener and more resilient economy in Spain. Activities, which continued during the COVID-19 pandemic, include the improvement of transversal skills, active job-search strategies, the creation of networks and professional contacts, and the development of emotional intelligence. So far, the programme has co-financed 339 projects, working with 500 organisations. It has supported 1.3 million recipients and helped create 2 600 businesses.

•A grocery and a social café were set up with the support of the EAFRD in Luxembourg to help people with intellectual disabilities enter the job market. Approximately 40 workshops have been organised with more than 500 participants. Some people with intellectual disabilities became associate teachers in the soap and candle workshops. Two jobs were created for people with special needs. In cooperation with Fairtrade Luxembourg, a tea brand with bio label certification was created. The packaging is made during a workshop for people with special needs.

•The new Geriatric Care Centre in the Polish coastal city of Sopot is designed to provide the Pomorskie region’s older residents with access to a comprehensive range of specialised medical services that were not previously available locally. Along with in- and outpatient treatment on site, these services include round-the-clock telecare support for the patients, their families and carers. In addition, the opening of the Centre already generated 70 new jobs. Costing a total of €6.6 million, the project was supported by a €4.6 million ERDF contribution.

•The Chioggia and Po Delta Fisheries Local Action Group (FLAG) in Italy has successfully convinced a high school to launch an official training programme in commercial fishing and fish production. With support from the EMFF, the FLAG used their animation activities financed through the EMFF, together with fisheries stakeholders and the wider local community, to attract their first groups of students who will become the entrepreneurs of the future.

3.4.Strengthening institutional capacity and efficient public administration

By the end of 2019, an estimated €5.2 billion had been allocated to projects addressing institutional capacity and reforms, representing 83% of the planned €6.2 billion (mainly from the ESF programmes). Spending on the ground amounted to €1.8 billion (30% of the planned total). This effort was complemented by support provided, in addition to the ESI Funds, through the Structural Reform Support Programme, now transformed intο the Technical Support Instrument 12 .

Financial implementation (in % of total amount planned)


Total amount planned (EU + national, €billion)


Efficient Public Administration

Allocated to projects

Spent by projects


Under this objective:

·487 782 participants have been supported by the ESF;

·2 331 projects targeting national, regional or local public administrations or public services have been supported by the ESF.

The implementation of projects targeting capacity building for stakeholders delivering education, lifelong learning, training and employment and social policies is lagging behind, with a project selection rate still below 40%. The reasons for the delay differ between Member States and include legal changes affecting implementation or difficulties connected with the innovative and complex features of intervention.

Box 5: Example of ESI Funds support to strenghten institutional capacity

•In Italy, an ESF project aims to improve the administrative capacity of small municipalities (i.e. those with a resident population of up to 5 000 inhabitants and those created following a merger of municipalities, each with a population of up to 5 000 inhabitants) and promote efficient public services, good governance and institutional capacity building at local level. With a total budget of €42 million, the project will produce impacts on the quality of services for citizens and businesses, improve the skills of local public authorities in implementing the policies supported by the ESI Funds through appropriate digital reorganisation interventions and access to data, strengthen multilevel governance and accompany the process of reforming local authorities.

3.5. Territorial and urban development

For 2014-2020, around €32 billion is being allocated for integrated territorial development and sustainable urban development. The implementation of these strategies suffered some delays in the early years of the programming period because of delays in finalising the strategies and setting up the administrative procedures ensuring decentralised implementation. Under cohesion policy funds, €23 billion has been allocated to projects until end-2019, representing 73% of the planned allocation. There was a considerable acceleration in the level of expenditure generated by the projects, reaching €8.3 billion (26% of the planned allocation) by end-2019. This is a striking increase compared to the €1.2 billion at end-2017.

The projects selected under the integrated development strategies until end-2019 will deliver: 42 million square meters of renovated or newly developed urban open space (141% of the target) accessible to the public; 2.6 million square meters of renovated or newly built public buildings (111% of the target); and nearly 21 000 renovated housing units (88.1% of the target). In line with the financial implementation, physical implementation is lagging behind and ranges between 15-30% of the target values.


Box 6: Example of ESI Funds supporting territorial and urban development

•In Poland, the post-industrial area and once wild parking lot in the suburbs of Krakow has turned into a green place for recreation and meetings open to all residents. The Przystań Wisła Park was created with extensive involvement of the public, which chose the park concept project in a wide public consultation. The park’s facilities include a café, a playground and an open-air art gallery for local people to showcase their work. The park also has a rain garden and a public vegetable garden. Access for people with disabilities is provided. The investment for this project totalled €603 462, with the ERDF contributing €319 243.

3.6.Territorial cooperation

The ERDF provides support to territorial cooperation programmes that invest in cross-border, transnational and interregional projects. These programmes account for €12.6 billion of the planned allocation, of which €11.8 billion had already been allocated to projects by end-2019. These projects generated €3.8 billion in expenditure, which represents 30% of the planned amount. As such, until the end of 2019, the financial implementation of the cooperation programmes remained slower than the implementation of the national/regional programmes.

Some of the achievements of the territorial cooperation programmes are included in the indicators aggregated under the key investment themes above, while some dedicated indicators measure the cooperation aspect of the projects supported:

·17 500 enterprises and 3 600 research instutions have participated in cross-border, transnational or interregional research projects;

·107 000 persons have benefitted from cross-border mobility initiatives;

·more than 80 000 people have participated in joint local employment initiatives and joint training courses.

Box 6: Examples of ESI Funds supporting territorial cooperation

•In the cross-border area between France and Spain, where accessibility in mountain areas can be difficult, the EGAL-URG project created a mobile hospital for disaster and emergency situations, including for responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Within 20 minutes, what looks like a simple van becomes a hospital with all the necessary equipment to look after 18 patients, and it includes a small intensive care unit that can host eight patients. The project benefited from a €1.5 million ERDF grant.

•The Interreg alpine space project ‘Smart Villages’ makes remote villages in France, Italy, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and Slovenia smarter. A Smart Village approach for mountain areas could unlock the potential of local actors to make their region a more attractive place to live and work. The project is now part of a macro-regional strategy (EUSALP) and is fully embedded in the Commission’s Smart Villages strategy. €2 million of the total investment of €2.6 million was provided by the ERDF.

4.Evaluation work by the Member States

The evaluation effort of the Member States has made a considerable progress in the past year when assessing the achievement of targets, the processes at the heart of implementation, and the outcomes and effects of the actions supported. This represents a great commitment to generating evidence for policymaking, in line with the stronger result orientation of the policy. The evaluation efforts have substantially increased compared to the 2007-2013 programming period, also thanks to various forms of support provided by the Commission.

The increased number of completed evaluations has brought extensive knowledge about the implementation of the programmes and their effectiveness. While the findings are difficult to generalise, the ESI Funds have been effective in many areas and have provided concrete support to different types of beneficiaries in the public and private sectors as well as to individuals. Inclusive growth is the area where EU added value is more evident and on which most of the impact evaluations conducted so far is concentrated.

Evaluations in their respective areas provide Member States with valuable input for policy design, which includes the preparation of the 2021-2027 programmes. The available findings will be complemented by a growing number of impact evaluations in the final years of the programming period, when more results are expected to emerge. Further challenges will arise when the time comes to assess the impacts. The Commission will continue to provide support to the Member States through the dedicated networks and services.

The staff working document that accompanies this report provides more details on the findings of the evaluations undertaken by the Member States and the Commission on the programmes supported by ESI Funds.

5.Conclusions

The investments supported by the programmes of the ESI Funds play a crucial role in supporting regions, cities, rural areas and coastal communities, improving the quality of life of millions of Europeans in every Member State and region in the European Union. They significantly contribute to the Commission’s strategic priorities, in particular the green and digital transition of the European economy and the economy that works for people, in line with the values expressed in the European Pillar of Social Rights, leaving no one behind.

2019 was the sixth year of implementation of the programmes of the 2014-2020 ESI Funds, with expenditure eligible for funding until end-2023. After a slow start in the first few years of the programming period, implementation sped up as of 2017, with very significant results achieved in 2019. This enabled progress in fully committing the available resources, with 89% (or €570.6 billion) of the available funding awarded to selected projects. By the end of 2020, the project selection rate had further increased to 101%. In the case of some Member States and Funds, the value of the existing projects already exceeds their allocations. Expenditure generated by the investment projects is catching up quickly and reached €264.1 billion, representing 41% of the overall allocation. The spending rate had reached 56% by end-2020.

Progress in financial implementation varies across the different themes, with support to SME competitiveness, climate change adaptation and risk prevention, and transport and energy network infrastructures performing best. Investments in some key areas, including research and innovation, digitalisation and social inclusion, are being implemented at a slower pace, but the important acceleration in the past two years is expected to be maintained for the remainder of the implementation period.

Some remarkable achievements were recorded for a number of common indicators where the 2019 achievement values show a steep increase compared to the cumulative 2014-2018 achievements. In general, the level of achievements closely follows the level of expenditure generated by the projects. Some important differences can be observed in the level of achievement for the common indicators, which is mainly due to the different pace of implementation of the underlying investments and the nature of deliverables produced by the projects. Past evidence shows that in all cases, the bulk of tangible achievements occurs in the second half of the programming cycle.

The monitoring data available suggests that the Funds will reach the objectives set. The preliminary findings on the impacts of interventions funded under 2014-2020 programmes, drawn on the basis of the most reliable evaluations carried out by Member States, point to positive results and offer recommendations to develop the interventions in order to consolidate and extend their benefits.

The ESI Funds were successfully deployed in 2020 to help Member States alleviate the negative impacts of the health and economic crises caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The rules governing the Funds were amended at unprecedented speed, enabling any unallocated money to be rapidly shifted to tackle the crisis. With retroactive effect, as of February 2020, the ESI Funds provided an essential emergency response to the crisis by supporting the purchase of medical equipment and helping companies and workers to cope with the crisis, demonstrating their flexibility and ability to react fast under unforeseeable circumstances. More than €20 billion was already mobilised until end-2020 and re-directed where the money was most needed. Reinforced with the €47.5 billion of the REACT-EU package and an additional €8.07 billion for rural development from the European Union Recovery Instrument, the programmes of the ESI Funds will bridge the short-term emergency response with the long-term goal of a green and digital transition for all Member States and regions that will be supported in the 2021-2027 programming period.

(1) Regulation (EU) 2020/558 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 (OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 1).
(2) The details of financial implementation by ESI Fund and by Member State are provided in the Annexes.
(3) Cohesion data from 31.12.2020 – EAFRD and EMFF data from 31.12.2019. Applicable to all financial data references for the year 2020 included in the document.
(4) EAFRD: €16.5 million, EMFF: €61.7 million, ERDF: €21.2 million, ESF: €30.9 million.
(5)

   All ESI Funds target support for enterprises. The selected projects will support (or have delivered support to) 1 093 000 firms under ERDF, 733 100 micro, small and medium-sized enterprises under ESF and 317 600 rural firms under EAFRD (127 600 young farmers supported and investments in physical assets of 190 000 farm holdings).

(6) For further detail see Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(7) Regulation (EU) 2020/460 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 2020 (OJ L 99, 31.3.2020, p. 5).
(8) Regulation (EU) 2020/558 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 (OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 1).
(9) https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/CORONAVIRUS-DASHBOARD-COHESION-POLICY-RESPONSE/4e2z-pw8r/
(10) The values provided do not reflect the impact of the COVID pandemic on programme objectives and achievements. Programme amendments to reallocate funding to crisis response measures are still ongoing. The achievement values of 2020 will only be reported to the Commission by Member States in the course of 2021. The first assessment of the impact of the COVID crisis will therefore be analysed by the Commission in the next annual summary report, due at the end of 2021, taking into account the support to respond to the COVID-19 crisis and the first effects of the social and economic crisis on the strategic programme objectives and targets.
(11) ESI Funds Open Data Platform: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/  
(12) Regulation (EU) 2021/240 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 February 2021 establishing a Technical Support Instrument - available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/240