Annexes to COM(2014)340 - Establishment of a Controller of procedural guarantees to the European Anti-Fraud Office - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2014)340 - Establishment of a Controller of procedural guarantees to the European Anti-Fraud Office. |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2014)340  |
| date | June 11, 2014 |
2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities
Specify existing or envisaged prevention and protection measures.
There is a clear separation between the activities of the Controller of procedural guarantees and of the Supervisory Committee, and between the secretariats of the two structures.
3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected
· Existing budget lines
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution
Number […][Heading………………………………………...……….]– To be completed after agreement of the DG to which the Controller will be attached || Diff./non-diff. ([6]) || from EFTA countries[7] || from candidate countries[8] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation
|| […][XX.YY.YY.YY] || Diff./non-diff. || NO || NO || NO || NO
· New budget lines requested
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution
Number […][Heading………………………………………...……….] || Diff./non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation
|| […][XX.YY.YY.YY] || || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO
3.2. Estimated impact on expenditure
[This section should be filled in using spreadsheet on budget data of an administrative nature (second document in annex to this financial statement) and uploaded to CISNET for interservice consultation purposes.]
3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on expenditure
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Heading of multiannual financial framework || Number || […][Heading……………...……………………………………………………………….]
DG: <…….> || || || Year N[9] || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL
Ÿ Operational appropriations || || || || || || || ||
Number of budget line || Commitments || (1) || || || || || || || ||
Payments || (2) || || || || || || || ||
Number of budget line || Commitments || (1a) || || || || || || || ||
Payments || (2a) || || || || || || || ||
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes[10] || || || || || || || ||
Number of budget line || || (3) || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations for DG <….> || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || || || || || || || ||
Payments || =2+2a +3 || || || || || || || ||
Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || || || || || || || ||
Payments || (5) || || || || || || || ||
Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations for HEADING <….> of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =4+ 6 || || || || || || || ||
Payments || =5+ 6 || || || || || || || ||
If more than one heading is affected by the proposal / initiative:
Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || || || || || || || ||
Payments || (5) || || || || || || || ||
Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =4+ 6 || || || || || || || ||
Payments || =5+ 6 || || || || || || || ||
Heading of multiannual financial framework || 5 || " Administrative expenditure "
EUR million (to three decimal places)
|| || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL
DG: <…> - to be determined ||
Ÿ Human resources || 0.198 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 2.178
§ Other operating cost (Special Adviser and substitute) || 0.045 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.495
Ÿ Other administrative expenditure || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.06
TOTAL DG <…> || Appropriations || 0.253 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 2.733
TOTAL appropriations for HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || 0.253 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 2.733
EUR million (to three decimal places)
|| || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL
TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || 0.253 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 2.733
Payments || 0.253 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 2.733
3.2.2. Estimated impact on operational appropriations
– ¨ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
– ¨ The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below:
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)
Indicate objectives and outputs ò || || || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL
OUTPUTS
Type[11] || Average cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No total || Total cost
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1[12] ... || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
Subtotal for specific objective No 1 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE NO 2 ... || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
Subtotal for specific objective No 2 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL COST || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
3.2.3. Estimated impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
3.2.3.1. Summary
– ¨ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations of an administrative nature
– ý The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an administrative nature, as explained below:
EUR million (to three decimal places)
|| 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL
HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || ||
Human resources || 0.198 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 0.396 || 2.178
Other operating cost (Special Adviser and substitute) || 0.045 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.090 || 0.495
Other administrative expenditure || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.01 || 0.06
Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 0.253 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 2.733
TOTAL || 0.253 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 0.496 || 2.733
The human resources appropriations required will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.
The figures in the “Human resources” line correspond to the cost involved by the recruitment of 2 AD grade and 1 AST/SC grade staff, with the figure for the first year reduced to half, to reflect the reduced workload expected in the first year of existence of the Controller.
The figure in the “Other operating cost” line reflects the cost of the Controller, who would be an AD15 grade Special Adviser remunerated according to the number of days of actual work. The line also includes the cost of the substitute, but this does not have to be reflected separately and neither it implies additional cost, since he would be called on only to replace the Controller, who would then not be remunerated.
Given the expected workload, the part-time work foreseen for the Controller (and his substitute) is estimated to amount to 25 per cent of the ordinary monthly full-time work time in the first year of activity (5,5 days per month), and 50 per cent thereafter (11 days per month).
There are also foreseen 2 days of mission per month.
3.2.3.2. Estimated requirements of human resources
– ¨ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources.
– ý The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below:
Estimate to be expressed in full time equivalent units
|| 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020
XX 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) || 1.5 || 3 || 3 || 3 || 3 || 3
XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) || || || || || ||
XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) || || || || || ||
10 01 05 01 (Direct research) || || || || || ||
Ÿ External staff (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE)[13] ||
XX 01 02 01 (CA, SNE, INT from the "global envelope") || || || || || ||
XX 01 02 02 (CA, LA, SNE, INT and JED in the delegations) || || || || || ||
XX 01 04 yy[14] || - at Headquarters || || || || || ||
- Delegations || || || || || ||
XX 01 05 02 (CA, SNE, INT - Indirect research) || || || || || ||
10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Direct research) || || || || || ||
Other budget lines 25 01 02 03 || 0.25 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5
TOTAL || 1.75 || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5 || 3.5
XX is the policy area or budget title concerned.
The human resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.
Description of tasks to be carried out:
Officials and temporary staff || Receiving and reviewing complaints about their procedural rights lodged by persons concerned in OLAF investigations.
External staff ||
3.2.4. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework
– ý Proposal/initiative is compatible the current multiannual financial framework.
– ¨ Proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the multiannual financial framework.
Explain what reprogramming is required, specifying the budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
– ¨ Proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework[15].
Explain what is required, specifying the headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
3.2.5. Third-party contributions
– ý The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third parties.
– The proposal/initiative provides for the co-financing estimated below:
Appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
|| Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || Total
Specify the co-financing body || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations cofinanced || || || || || || || ||
3.3. Estimated impact on revenue
– ý Proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
– ¨ Proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
– ¨ on own resources
– ¨ on miscellaneous revenue
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the current financial year || Impact of the proposal/initiative[16]
Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)
Article …………. || || || || || || || ||
For miscellaneous ‘assigned’ revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.
Specify the method for calculating the impact on revenue.
[1] OJC, , p
[2] COM(2013) 534 final, 17 July 2013.
[3] ABM: activity-based management – ABB: activity-based budgeting.
[4] As referred to in Article 54(2)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.
[5] Details of management modes and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
[6] Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-Diff. = Non-differentiated appropriations.
[7] EFTA: European Free Trade Association.
[8] Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[9] Year N is the year in which implementation of the proposal/initiative starts.
[10] Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[11] Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.: number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
[12] As described in point 1.4.2. ‘Specific objective(s)…’
[13] CA= Contract Staff; LA = Local Staff; SNE= Seconded National Expert; INT = agency staff; JED= Junior Experts in Delegations).
[14] Sub-ceiling for external staff covered by operational appropriations (former "BA" lines).
[15] See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement (for the period 2007-2013).
[16] As regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 25% for collection costs.