Annexes to COM(2013)75 - Amending a number of directives on the market surveillance of products

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

ANNEX

Correlation table

Regulation EC No. 765/2008 || This Regulation

Article 15(1), (2) and (5) || Article 2

Article 15(3) || -

Article 15(4) || Article 3(1)

Article 16(1) || Article 4(1)

Article 16(2) || Article 4(2) read in conjunction with Article 3(12); Article 17(1) and Article 26 (5)

Article 16(3) || -

Article 16(4) || -

Article 17(1) || Article 5(4)

Article 17(2) || Article 26(1)

Article 18(1) || Article 5(3)

Article 18(2) || Article 6(6)

Article 18(3) || Article 5(2)

Article 18(4) || Article 6(4)

Article 18(5) and (6) || Article 4(3), Article 6(7)(8) and (9) and Article 26(2)

Article 19(1) first subparagraph || Article 6(1)

Article 19(1) second subparagraph || Article 6(5) and Article 7

Article 19(1) third subparagraph || Article 8(1) second subparagraph

Article 19(2) || Article 6(2)

Article 19(3) || Article 9(5)(a)

Article 19(4) || Article 6(3)

Article 19(5) || Article 26(5) and Article 27

Article 20(1) || Articles 9(4) and 18(1)(b)

Article 20(2) || Article 12

Article 21 || Article 6(4) and Article 9

Article 22(1), (2) and (3) || Article 18(1) and (2)

Article 22(4) || Article 17

Article 23(1) and (2) || Article 19

Article 23(3) || Article 27

Article 24(1) and (2) || Article 20

Article 24(3) || Article 19(1)

Article 24(4) || Article 18(2) and Article 19(2)

Article 25 || Articles 22 to 24

Article 26 || Article 21

Article 27 || Article 13

Article 28 || Article 14

Article 29 || Article 15

LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

1.1.        Title of the proposal/initiative

1.2.        Policy area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure

1.3.        Nature of the proposal/initiative

1.4.        Objective(s)

1.5.        Grounds for the proposal/initiative

1.6.        Duration and financial impact

1.7.        Management method(s) envisaged

2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES

2.1.        Monitoring and reporting rules

2.2.        Management and control system

2.3.        Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities

3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

3.1.        Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected

3.2.        Estimated impact on expenditure

3.2.1.     Summary of estimated impact on expenditure

3.2.2.     Estimated impact on operational appropriations

3.2.3.     Estimated impact on appropriations of an administrative nature

3.2.4.     Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework

3.2.5.     Third-party participation in financing

3.3.        Estimated impact on revenue

LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

1.1.        Title of the proposal/initiative

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on market surveillance of products

1.2.        Policy area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure[42]

Title 2 – Enterprise - Chapter 02 03: Internal market for goods and sectoral policies

Title 17 – Health and consumer protection – Chapter 17 02: Consumer policy

1.3.        Nature of the proposal/initiative

The proposal/initiative relates to the extension of an existing action

1.4.        Objectives

1.4.1.     The Commission's multiannual strategic objective(s) targeted by the proposal/initiative

Internal market for goods and sectoral policies: to improve the functioning of the single market and to achieve a high level of protection of consumers, other users and other public interests;

Security and citizenship – consumer policy.

1.4.2.     Specific objective(s) and ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned

ENTR specific objective: To continually review existing internal market acquis and propose new legislative or non-legislative action whenever appropriate.

SANCO specific objective: To consolidate and enhance product safety through effective market surveillance throughout the Union

1.4.3.     Expected result(s) and impact

Specify the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.

The expected result of this initiative is to improve the framework of the market surveillance which is still fragmented in the Union. This proposal amalgamates the provisions of the Regulation 765/2008/EC and of the General Product Safety Directive regarding the market surveillance into one single piece of legislation covering products in both the harmonised and non-harmonised acquis, regardless whether they are destined for use, or are likely to be used, by consumers or professionals. This proposal will have an impact on economic operators and national authorities who will be better informed on their obligations regarding market surveillance actions. The proposal will also enhance the protection of consumers and other users of products through more effective enforcement of product-related requirements.

1.4.4.     Indicators of results and impact

Specify the indicators for monitoring implementation of the proposal/initiative.

- Number of notifications regarding unsafe products in the GRAS-RAPEX information system;

- % of RAPEX notifications entailing at least one reaction (by other Member States

- Ratio number of reactions / number of notifications (serious risks)-

- Volume and quality of data exchanged the general information support system ICSMS,

- Number and results of joint market surveillance actions,

- Work- and resource-sharing.

- Product safety enforcement indicators (budgets, inspections, laboratory tests, measures taken etc.)

1.5.        Grounds for the proposal

1.5.1.     Requirement(s) to be met in the short or long term

The general objective of this initiative is to improve the functioning of the single market and to achieve a high level of protection of consumers, other users and other public interests through the reduction of number of unsafe or non-compliant products.

1.5.2.     Added value of EU involvement

Despite the existence of the single European market, the enforcement of product safety requirements is the Member States' competence. Due to the existing differences in the national organisation of market surveillance in the Member States and to the interdependence of the national market surveillance authorities, problems still appears. The EU has the right to act on the basis of Article 114 TFEU, in order to ensure the proper functioning of the single market for consumer products and to increase the efficiency of cross-border market surveillance. Article 169(1) of TFEU complements this right to act. It stipulates that in order to promote the interests of consumers and to ensure a high level of consumer protection, the Union shall, amongst others, contribute to protecting the health, safety and economic interests of consumers. However, in order to comply with the subsidiarity principle, this proposal does not affect the competence of the Member States to carry out procedures and actions against concrete products posing risks.

1.5.3.     Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past

Although the EU has achieved the Single Market and the free movement of goods is the most developed and best established of the four freedoms making up the internal market, there are still things to be done. Public health and safety in the workplace, protection of consumers, protection of the environment and other public interests may be undermined due to some traders who do not comply with the law and place on the market dangerous products. Market surveillance is meant to be an answer to all these issues. Nevertheless, market surveillance has not kept pace with developments in the Union regulatory framework. It needs to be highly coordinated and capable of reacting rapidly throughout EU. It is true that progress has been made with the implementation of the General Product Safety Directive and with the Regulation 765/2008/EC, but the fragmentation of market surveillance rules among different pieces of EU legislation (the General Product Safety Directive, the Regulation 765/2008/EC and many sectorial directives) has led to confusion of both economic operators and national authorities and to a reduced effectiveness of market surveillance activity in the Union. Therefore, this proposal for a single, self-standing market surveillance regulation would be essential to tackle these problems.

1.5.4.     Coherence and possible synergy with other relevant instruments

This initiative is entirely coherent with the acquis on the free movement of goods, in particular Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys, Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits, Directive 2009/142/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels.[43]

This proposal is also coherent with the accompanying proposal for a Regulation on Consumer Product Safety which will replace Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety.

The proposal creates synergies with regard to the notification of unsafe products and of safeguard measures under sectoral legislation which in the future will need to be notified only once under the revised RAPEX system.

1.6.        Duration and financial impact

Proposal/initiative of unlimited duration

1.7.        Management mode(s) envisaged

X Centralised direct management by the Commission

X Centralised indirect management with the delegation of implementation tasks to:

· X          executive agencies

· ¨         bodies set up by the Communities[44]

· ¨         national public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission

¨      persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and identified in the relevant basic act within the meaning of Article 49 of the Financial Regulation

¨ Shared management with the Member States

¨ Decentralised management with third countries

¨ Joint management with international organisations (to be specified)

If more than one management mode is indicated, please provide details in the "Comments" section.

Comment:

This initiative does not require new budgetary resources but will be financed through redeployment of existing resources. Some actions will be managed by the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC): In accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for Executive Agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes[45], the Commission has entrusted[46] the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers with implementation tasks for the management of the Programme of Community Action in the field of Consumer policy for 2007-2013. The Commission may therefore decide to entrust the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers also with implementation tasks for the management of the Consumers Programme 2014-2020, which, once adopted, should be the legal basis for procurement and grants in the field of product safety. The envisaged programme delegation will be the extension of tasks already externalised to the EAHC.

Furthermore, this initiative does not require additional budget resources for the costs related to the management, maintenance and adaptations for both IT systems, i.e. GRAS-RAPEX and ICSMS, compared to those already included in the operational budgets of DG SANCO and DG ENTR proposed for the MFF 2014-2020.

2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES

2.1.        Monitoring and reporting rules

Specify frequency and conditions.

The future market Surveillance Forum (EMSF) will be the platform for discussions regarding the proper implementation of the future regulation.

A final provision also proposes that the Commission makes an evaluation and drafts a report regarding the implementation five years after its entry into force. This should identify possible problems and shortcomings of the Regulation and could be the starting point for further actions, including a possible proposal to amend it, in view of further improvement of market surveillance framework.

2.2.        Management and control system

2.2.1.     Risk(s) identified

Risks relating to the proper functioning of RAPEX (e.g. increase of number of notifications diverting attention from really dangerous products or reducing its credibility; IT-related probems such as breakdown of the system, confidentiality issues).

The risks related to the functioning of ICSMS relate mainly to IT-related probems such as a possible breakdown of the system and confidentiality issues.

2.2.2.     Control method(s) envisaged

The control methods envisaged are laid down in the Financial Regulation and Rules of Application.

2.3.        Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities

Specify existing or envisaged prevention and protection measures.

The Commission must ensure that the financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities, by effective checks and by the recovery of amounts unduly paid and, if irregularities are detected, by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, in accordance with Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95, (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 and (EC) No 1073/1999. In addition to the application of all regulatory control mechanisms, the competent Commission services will devise an anti-fraud strategy in line with the Commission's new anti-fraud strategy (CAFS; adopted on 24 June 2011) in order to ensure inter alia that its internal anti-fraud related controls are fully aligned with the CASF and that its fraud risk management approach is geared to identify fraud risk areas and adequate responses. Where necessary, networking groups and adequate IT tools dedicated to analysing fraud cases related to the Consumer Programme will be set up. In particular a series of measures will be put in place such as:

· decisions, agreements and contracts resulting from the implementation of the Consumer Programme will expressly entitle the Commission, including OLAF, and the Court of Auditors to conduct audits, on-the-spot checks and inspections;

· during the evaluation phase of a call for proposals/tender, the proposers and tenderers are checked against the published exclusion criteria based on declarations and the Early Warning System (EWS);

· the rules governing the eligibility of costs will be simplified in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Regulation.

· regular training on issues related to fraud and irregularities is given to all staff involved in contract management as well as to auditors and controllers who verify the beneficiaries' declarations on the spot.

3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

3.1.        Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected

Existing expenditure budget lines

In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution

Number [Description………………………...……….] || Diff./non-diff. ([47]) || from EFTA[48] countries || from candidate countries[49] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation

N° 1: Internal Market for goods and sectoral policies || 02.03.01. || Diff || YES || NO || NO || NO

N° 3: Security and citizenship || 17.01.04.01 Administrative expenditure in support of the Consumer Programme 2014 - 2020 || Non-diff. || YES || NO || NO || NO

New budget lines requested

In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution

Number [Heading……………………………………..] || Diff./non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation

N° 3: Security and citizenship || 17 02 01 Consumer Programme 2014 - 2020 || Diff. || YES || YES || NO || NO

3.2.        Estimated impact on expenditure

3.2.1.     Summary of estimated impact on expenditure[50]

EUR million in current prices (to 3 decimal places)

Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 1 || Internal market for goods and sectoral policies

DG: ENTR || || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL

Ÿ Operational appropriations || || || || || || ||

Number of budget line 02.03.01 || Commitments || (1) || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Payments || (2) || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Appropriations of an administrative nature financed  from the envelope for specific programmes[51] || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

Number of budget line: || Commitments || (1a) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

Payments || (2a) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

|| || || || || || ||

TOTAL appropriations for DG ENTR || Commitments || =1+1a || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Payments || =2+2a || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (3) || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Payments || (4) || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (5) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 02 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =3+ 5 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Payments || =4+ 5 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 1,300 || 7,800

Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 3 || Security and citizenship

DG: SANCO || || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL

Ÿ Operational appropriations || || || || || || ||

Number of budget line 17.02.01 || Commitments || (1) || 3,000 || 3,060 || 3,121 || 3,184 || 3,247 || 3,312 || 18,924

Payments || (2) || 1,500 || 3,030 || 3,091 || 3,152 || 3,215 || 4,936 || 18,924

Appropriations of an administrative nature financed  from the envelope for specific programmes[52] || || || || || || ||

Number of budget line: 17.01.04.01 || Commitments || (1a) || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,600

Payments || (2a) || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,600

|| || || || || || || || ||

TOTAL appropriations for DG SANCO || Commitments || =1+1a || 3,100 || 3,160 || 3,221 || 3,284 || 3,347 || 3,412 || 19,524

Payments || =2+2a || 1,600 || 3,130 || 3,191 || 3,252 || 3,315 || 5,036 || 19,524

Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (3) || 3,000 || 3,060 || 3,121 || 3,184 || 3,247 || 3,312 || 18,924

Payments || (4) || 1,500 || 3,030 || 3,091 || 3,152 || 3,215 || 4,936 || 18,924

ŸTOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (5) || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,600

TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 3 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =3+ 5 || 3,100 || 3,160 || 3,221 || 3,284 || 3,347 || 3,412 || 19,524

Payments || =4+ 5 || 1,600 || 3,130 || 3,191 || 3,252 || 3,315 || 5,036 || 19,524

If more than one heading is affected by the proposal / initiative:

Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (6) || 4,300 || 4,360 || 4,421 || 4,484 || 4,547 || 4,612 || 26,724

Payments || (7) || 2,800 || 4,330 || 4,391 || 4,452 || 4,515 || 6,236 || 26,724

Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (8) || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,600

TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =6+ 8 || 4,400 || 4,460 || 4,521 || 4,584 || 4,647 || 4,712 || 27,324

Payments || =7+ 8 || 2,900 || 4,430 || 4,491 || 4,552 || 4,615 || 6,336 || 27,324

Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 5 || " Administrative expenditure "

EUR million in current prices (to 3 decimal places)

|| || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL

DG: ENTR || || ||

Ÿ Human resources || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 4,716

Ÿ Other administrative expenditure || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,474

DG SANCO || || || || || || ||

Ÿ Human resources || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 6,288

Ÿ Other administrative expenditure (missions, meetings) || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,474

TOTAL || Appropriations || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 11,952

TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 11,952

EUR million in current prices (to 3 decimal places)

|| || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL

TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || 6,392 || 6,452 || 6,513 || 6,576 || 6,639 || 6,704 || 39,276

Payments || 4,892 || 6,422 || 6,483 || 6,544 || 6,607 || 8,328 || 39,276

3.2.2.     Estimated impact on operational appropriations

The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below:

Commitment appropriations in EUR million in current prices (to 3 decimal places)

Indicate objectives and outputs ò || || || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL

||

Type of output[53] || Average cost of the output || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE[54]: To continually review existing internal market acquis and propose new legislative or non-legislative action whenever appropriate || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

Guidelines and inter-comparison activities || || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0,050 || 6 || 0.300 ||

Technical expertise and assistance || || 0.600 || 1 || 0.600 || 1 || 0.600 || 1 || 0.600 || 1 || 0.600 || 1 || 0.600 || 1 || 0,600 || 6 || 3.600 ||

Promotion of European market surveillance policies || || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 1 || 0.050 || 6 || 0.300

Cooperation with third countries || || 0.100 || 1 || 0.100 || 1 || 0.100 || 1 || 0.100 || 1 || 0.100 || 1 || 0.100 || 1 || 0.100 || 6 || 0.600

Support to market surveillance authorities (including ICSMS) || || 0.500 || 2 || 0.500 || 2 || 0.500 || 2 || 0.500 || 2 || 0.500 || 2 || 0.500 || 2 || 0.500 || 12 || 3.000

Sub-total for specific objective ENTR || 6 || 1.300 || 6 || 1.300 || 6 || 1.300 || 6 || 1.300 || 6 || 1.300 || 6 || 1.300 || 36 || 7.800

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE: SANCO || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

- Output || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

Market surveillance and enforcement actions (joint actions, exchange of officials, funding of the Market Surveillance Forum Secretariat) || || 2,357 || 3 || 2,242 || 3 || 2,287 || 3 || 2,333 || 3 || 2,380 || 3 || 2,427 || 3 || 2,425 || 18 || 14,144

Further development and management of RAPEX (especially IT applications) || || 0,797 || 1 || 0,758 || 1 || 0,773 || 1 || 0,788 || 1 || 0,804 || 1 || 0,820 || 1 || 0,837 || 6 || 4,780

|| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||

Sub-total for specific objective SANCO || 4 || 3,000 || 4 || 3,060 || 4 || 3,121 || 4 || 3,184 || 4 || 3,247 || 4 || 3,312 || 24 || 18,924

TOTAL COST || || 4,300 || || 4,360 || || 4,421 || || 4,484 || || 4,547 || || 4,612 || || 26,724

3.2.3.     Estimated impact on appropriations of an administrative nature

3.2.3.1.  Summary

The proposal/initiative requires the use of administrative appropriations, as explained below:

EUR million in current prices (to 3 decimal places)

|| 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL

HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || ||

Human resources ENTR || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 4.716

Human resources SANCO (Average cost FTE: 131.000 €) || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 6,288

Other administrative expenditure ENTR || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,474

Other administrative expenditure SANCO || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,079 || 0,474

Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 1,992 || 11,952

Outside HEADING 5[55] of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || ||

Human resources || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 ||

Other expenditure of an administrative nature SANCO || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,600

Subtotal outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,100 || 0,600

TOTAL || 2,092 || 2,092 || 2,092 || 2,092 || 2,092 || 2,092 || 12,552

3.2.3.2.  Estimated requirements of human resources

The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below:

EUR million in current prices (to 3 decimal places)

|| 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020

02 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) – ENTR || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786 || 0,786

17 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) – SANCO (Average cost FTE: 131.000 €) || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048 || 1,048

XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

10 01 05 01 (Direct research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

XX 01 02 01 (CA, INT, SNE from the "global envelope") || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

XX 01 02 02 (CA, INT, JED, LA and SNE in the delegations) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

XX 01 04 yy [56] || - at Headquarters[57] || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

- in delegations || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

XX 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Indirect research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Direct research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

Other budget lines (specify) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0

TOTAL (ENTR, SANCO) || 1,834 || 1,834 || 1,834 || 1,834 || 1,834 || 1,834

XX is the policy area or budget title concerned.

The human resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints. The resources required are indicated without taking into account the tasks which will be implemented by an executive agency. The proposal does not lead to an increase of the resources already involved in the executive agency.

Description of tasks to be carried out:

Officials and temporary agents || Administrators: Ensure, monitor and report on the proper implementation and application of EU policies in the area of market surveillance. Participate in developing tools and carrying out benchmarking of Member States' enforcement of the Market surveillance Regulation. Participate in the operation of the RAPEX system, including assessment of notifications and reactions; Management and development of the ICSMS platform and the corresponding guidelines; Follow policy developments in the area of market surveillance and information exchange between Member States. Participate and represent the Commission in expert groups linked to market surveillance. Conceive new activities or extensions of existing activities and perform conceptual reflections. Develop and ensure Member States' market surveillance coordination and joint actions. Participate in the development, adoption and then implementation of revised RAPEX guidelines and revised risk-assessment guidelines. Assistants: Provide administrative assistance in relation to the operation of the RAPEX system as a member of the internal RAPEX team. Signal possible inconsistencies or overlaps in notifications and contribute to and provide assistance in RAPEX Contact Points meetings. Contribute to follow up of RAPEX notifications, under the supervision of the responsible Administrator, in case of a formal noncompliance of notification. Contribute towards the preparation of the weekly report regarding validated notifications. Co-ordinate and authorize translation requests through Poetry. Contribute to the implementation and the carrying out of the internal control standards in particular by ensuring business continuity in RAPEX alerting team coordinator and management in cases of issues arising requiring their attention Coordinate information and document management in relation to validation of notifications and reactions in RAPEX. Elaborate and manage statistics and reports related to RAPEX. Elaborate internal procedures relating to GRAS RAPEX management and contribute to corresponding manuals.

External personnel ||

3.2.4.     Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework

The proposal is compatible with the new Multi-annual Financial Framework 2014-2020 as proposed by the Commission.

3.2.5.     Third-party contributions

The proposal does not provide for co-financing by third parties

3.3.        Estimated impact on revenue

The Proposal has no financial impact on revenue.

[1]               Harmonisation rules seek to achieve free movement by protecting at a high level public interests that Member States might otherwise invoke to justify imposing restrictions on trade in products.

[2]               In accordance with international agreements of the EU with the EFTA countries and Turkey.

[3]               OJ L 11, 15.1.2002, p. 4.

[4]               OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30.

[5]               COM(2011)206 final.

[6]               COM(2012)573 final.

[7]               OJ C , , p. .

[8]               OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p.30.

[9]               OJ L 11, 15.1.2002, p. 4.

[10]             2010/2085(INI).

[11]             OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

[12]             OJ L165, 30.6.2010, p.1.

[13]             OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p.82.

[14]             OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.

[15]             OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.

[16]             OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

[17]             OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

[18]             OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 11.

[19]             OJ L 399, 30.12.1989, p. 18.

[20]             OJ L 121, 15.5.1993, p. 20.

[21]             OJ L 100, 19.4.1994, p. 1.

[22]             OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 15.

[23]             OJ L 213, 7.9.1995, p. 1.

[24]             OJ L 181, 9.7.1997, p. 1.

[25]             OJ L 91, 7.4.1999, p. 10.

[26]             OJ L 106, 3.5.2000, p. 21.

[27]             OJ L 162, 3.7.2000, p. 1.

[28]             OJ L 390, 31.12.2004, p. 24.

[29]             OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24.

[30]             OJ L 374, 27.12.2006, p. 10.

[31]             OJ L 154, 14.6.2007, p. 1.

[32]             OJ L 191, 18.7.2008, p. 1.

[33]             OJ L 170, 30.6.2009, p. 1.

[34]             OJ L 264, 8.10.2009, p. 12.

[35]             OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 10.

[36]             OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, p. 88.

[37]             OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5.

[38]             OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 21.

[39]             OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1

[40]             OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12.

[41]             OJ L292, 14.11.1996, p.2.

[42]             ABM: Activity-Based Management – ABB: Activity-Based Budgeting.

[43]             The whole list of the sectoral legislation can be found in the annex of this regulation.

[44]             As referred to in Article 185 of the Financial Regulation.

[45]             OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p. 1.

[46]             Commission Decision C(2008)4943 of 9 September 2008.

[47]             Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. = Non-Differentiated Appropriations

[48]             EFTA: European Free Trade Association.

[49]             Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidate countries from the Western Balkans.

[50]             Amounts subject to the outcome of the Commission proposal for the new Multi-annual Financial Framework 2014-2020.

[51]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.

[52]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.

[53]             Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.: number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).

[54]             As described in Section 1.4.2. "Specific objective(s)…"

[55]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.

[56]             Under the ceiling for external personnel from operational appropriations (former "BA" lines).

[57]             Essentially for Structural Funds, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Fisheries Fund (EFF).