Annexes to COM(2007)612-2 - Conclusion of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Croatia to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Annex I.

(15) Spain’s letter of 21 March 2000: ‘the interest applied as a consequence of the rescheduling protects the creditor from the loss that it will incur as the money loses value over time’.

(16) The Spanish authorities’ reply of 4 July 2005: ‘Neither FOGASA nor the [TGSS] have sufficient data to estimate the value of the undertaking’s properties at that time.’

(17) The Spanish authorities’ reply of 29 September 2005.

(18) The Spanish authorities informed the Commission (letter of 28 February 2005 in reply to the Commission’s letter of 3 December 2004) that a number of meetings had been organised between SNIACE and the TGSS.

(19) OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22.

(20) Point 227 of the Eighth Report of the European Commission on Competition Policy of 1979. Point 3.2.2(i) of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 368, 31.12.1994, p. 12). Point 31 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2). Point 34 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).

(21) See point 3.2.2(i) of the 1994 Guidelines: ‘… aid must be linked to a viable restructuring/recovery programme …’.

(22) Letter of the Spanish authorities sent by fax on 30 June 1997, p. 2.

(23) Second paragraph of point 4 of the Commission Communication on regional aid systems (OJ C 31, 3.2.1979, p. 9). Point 4.15 of the Guidelines on national regional aid (OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p. 9).

(24) OJ C 346, 30.12.1992, p. 2 and OJ C 94, 30.3.1996, p. 11.

(25) OJ C 272, 15.11.2007, p. 4.

(26) OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

(27) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.

(28) (Awaiting publication).

(29) Paragraph 83.