Considerations on COM(2023)544 - Amendment of Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU, establishing a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, as regards Trinidad and Tobago

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
 
1. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURE

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 (the ‘IUU Regulation’) establishes a Union system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.

(2) Chapter VI of the IUU Regulation lays down the procedure to identify non-cooperating third countries, the démarches in respect of such countries, the establishment of a list of such countries, the removal from that list, the publicity of that list and any emergency measures.

(3) On 24 March 2014, the Council adopted Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU3 establishing a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.

(4) In accordance with Article 32 of the IUU Regulation, by a Decision of 21 April 2016 (the Decision of 21 April 2016)4, the Commission notified the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (‘Trinidad and Tobago’) of the possibility of its identification as a country which the Commission considers as non-cooperating third country.

(5) In its Decision of 21 April 2016, the Commission included information on the essential facts and considerations underlying such possible identification.

(6) That Decision was notified to Trinidad and Tobago together with a letter inviting Trinidad and Tobago to implement, in close cooperation with the Commission, an action plan to rectify the identified shortcomings.

(7) By its Decision of 21 April 2016, the Commission opened a dialogue process with Trinidad and Tobago.

(8) In particular, the Commission invited Trinidad and Tobago to take all necessary measures to implement the actions contained in the action plan suggested by the Commission and to assess their implementation.

(9) Trinidad and Tobago was given the opportunity to respond to the Decision of 21 April 2016 as well as to other relevant information communicated by the Commission, and to submit evidence refuting or completing the facts stated in that Decision. Trinidad and Tobago was assured of its right to ask for, or to provide, additional information.

(10) The Commission has continued to seek and verify all relevant information. The oral and written comments submitted by Trinidad and Tobago following the Decision of 21 April 2016 were considered and taken into account. Physical as well as virtual meetings were held between Trinidad and Tobago and the Commission to discuss relevant points. Trinidad and Tobago was kept informed, either orally or in writing, of the Commission's considerations.

(11) On the basis of the information gathered, the Commission established that the areas of concern and shortcomings set out in the Decision of 21 April 2016 had not been addressed sufficiently by Trinidad and Tobago. Moreover, the Commission concluded that the measures proposed in the plan of action had not been fully implemented.

(12) As a consequence the Commission adopted Implementing Decision 2023/xxx/EU5, identifying Trinidad and Tobago as a non-cooperating third country in fighting IUU fishing (the ‘Implementing Decision of 25 September 2023’).

(13) Based on the investigation and dialogue process carried out by the Commission, including the correspondence exchanged and the meetings held, and the reasons underlying the Decision of 21 April 2016 and Implementing Decision of 25 September 2023, it is appropriate to place Trinidad and Tobago on the list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing.

2. IDENTIFICATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AS A NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRY

(14) In the Decision of 21 April 2016, the Commission analysed the duties of Trinidad and Tobago and evaluated its compliance with its international obligations as flag, port, coastal or market State. For the purpose of that review, the Commission took into account the criteria listed in Article 31(4) to (7) of the IUU Regulation.

(15) The Commission reviewed the compliance of Trinidad and Tobago in line with the findings of the Decision of 21 April 2016 and, with regard to relevant information provided thereon by Trinidad and Tobago, the suggested plan of action, and the measures taken to rectify the situation.

(16) The main shortcomings identified by the Commission were related to several failures to implement international law obligations, linked in particular to the adoption of an adequate and updated legal framework, lack of efficient and adequate monitoring of fishing vessels flying the flag of Trinidad and Tobago and lack of fisheries inspections at port. The identified shortcomings relate, more generally, to the lack of compliance with the obligations contained in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)6, the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA)7 and the Agreement on Port State Measures to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing (PSMA)8.

(17) In Implementing Decision of 25 September 2023, the Commission therefore identified Trinidad and Tobago as a non-cooperating third country pursuant to the IUU Regulation.

(18) No evidence has been found to suggest that the failure of Trinidad and Tobago to discharge its duties under international law is the result of development constraints.

(19) Having regard to the Decision of 21 April 2016 and Implementing Decision of 25 September 2023, and to the dialogue process with Trinidad and Tobago held with the Commission and its outcome, it is concluded that the actions undertaken by Trinidad and Tobago in light of its duties as flag State are insufficient to comply with Articles 94, 117, 118 and 119 of UNCLOS, Articles 18, 19 and 23 of UNFSA and Articles 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12 of PSMA.

(20) Therefore, Trinidad and Tobago has failed to discharge its duties under international law as flag State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.

3. ESTABLISHMENT OF A LIST OF NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRIES

(21) In view of the conclusions reached with regard to Trinidad and Tobago, that country should be added, in accordance with Article 33 of the IUU Regulation, to the list of non-cooperating third countries established by Council Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU. That Decision should therefore be amended accordingly.

(22) The inclusion of Trinidad and Tobago in the list of non-cooperating countries in the fight against IUU fishing entails the application of the measures laid down in Article 38 of the IUU Regulation. Article 38(1) of the IUU Regulation provides for the prohibition of importation of fisheries products caught by vessels flying the flag of non-cooperating countries. In the case of Trinidad and Tobago, that prohibition should cover all stocks and species defined in Article 2(8) of the IUU Regulation, as the lack of appropriate measures adopted in relation to IUU fishing which has led to the identification of Trinidad and Tobago as a non-cooperating third country is not limited to a given stock or species.

(23) It is noted that IUU fishing, inter alia, depletes fish stocks, destroys marine habitats, undermines the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources, distorts competition, endangers food security, puts compliant fishermen at an unfair disadvantage and weakens coastal communities. In view of the magnitude of the problems related to IUU fishing, it is considered necessary for the Union to expeditiously implement the actions in respect to Trinidad and Tobago as a non-cooperating country. Therefore, this Decision should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(24) If Trinidad and Tobago demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified, the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove Trinidad and Tobago from the list of non-cooperating third countries in line with Article 34(1) of the IUU Regulation. Any such removal decision should also take into consideration whether Trinidad and Tobago has taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation.