Considerations on COM(2020)484 - Commitment of the funds stemming from reflows under the ACP Investment Facility from operations under the 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
 
table>(1)Funds stemming from reflows under the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Investment Facility from operations under the 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) (‘funds stemming from reflows’) cannot be committed beyond 31 December 2020 unless the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal of the Commission, decides otherwise.
(2)There is strong evidence that, while the ACP Investment Facility contributed to the objectives of poverty reduction, integration into the world economy and sustainable development of the ACP countries, as set out in the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part (2) (‘the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement’), it did not maximise its contribution in that regard. The continued use of the ACP Investment Facility reflows under a new framework and governance could lead to better development results.

(3)On 14 June 2018 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (‘the NDICI proposal’), which provides for the establishment of the European Fund for Sustainable Development Plus (‘EFSD+’) and an External Action Guarantee, to which Member States could make contributions that they could earmark for the initiation of actions in specific regions, countries, sectors or existing investment windows.

(4)On 4 December 2020 the ACP-EU Committee of Ambassadors adopted Decision No 2/2020 (3), amending Decision No 3/2019 (4) to adopt transitional measures pursuant to Article 95(4) of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement to further extend the application of the provisions of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement until 30 November 2021, or until the entry into force of a new ACP-EU Agreement (‘the new Agreement’), or the provisional application between the Union and the ACP States of the new Agreement, whichever comes first. The period laid down in Article 1(5) of the 11th EDF Internal Agreement, during which the funds stemming from reflows under the ACP Investment Facility from operations under the 9th, 10th, and 11th European Development Funds may be committed, should be extended until 30 June 2021 in order to allow for new commitments of reflows under the ACP Investment Facility and continuous support to ACP countries until an instrument for funding neighbourhood, development and international cooperation to be adopted on the basis of the NDICI proposal (‘the external financing instrument’) becomes fully operational.

(5)The European Fund for Sustainable Development established by Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5) (EFSD) is considered to be highly relevant to the investment needs of the regions covered (Sub-Saharan Africa and the European Neighbourhood), as well as to the Union’s priorities and commitments.

(6)In their joint communication of 9 March 2020 entitled ‘Towards a comprehensive Strategy with Africa’ (‘the joint communication’), the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the High Representative’) called for the Union to support sustainable growth and jobs throughout the African continent. The Union wants, inter alia, to partner with Africa on the promotion of investments by scaling up the use of innovative financing mechanisms.

(7)In the joint communication, the Commission and the High Representative underlined that financial instruments are to encourage investments with a high development impact, largely in support of the private sector, in accordance with the criteria established by the Commission communication of 13 May 2014 entitled ‘A Stronger Role of the Private Sector in Achieving Inclusive and Sustainable Growth in Developing Countries’, namely measurable development impact, additionality, neutrality, shared interest and co-financing, demonstration effect and adherence to social, environmental and fiscal standards.

(8)It is necessary to allow for the reflows referred to in this Decision to constitute contributions to the external financing instrument (‘earmarked external assigned revenue’ as referred to in point (a)(ii) of Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6)) in order to finance support to ACP countries under a single-package approach, and in accordance with the objectives, principles and governance of the external financing instrument, through financial instruments, blending operations, budgetary guarantees or any other non-repayable form of support, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. This will allow for an uninterrupted transition from the ACP Investment Facility and continuity in terms product range.

(9)The funds stemming from reflows should not be received as external assigned revenue by the external financing instrument beyond 31 December 2027. Without prejudice to the decisions to be taken with respect to the subsequent multiannual financial frameworks, after that date those funds will be received by subsequent financing mechanisms until they are exhausted.

(10)The ACP Investment Facility reflows, in view of the estimated overall amount expected for the period 2021–2027, should be transferred annually as a top-up to the relevant budget lines of the external financing instrument, in line with the programming documents.

(11)The Commission should channel the funds stemming from reflows through the European Investment Bank (EIB), including through the EFSD+, with the aim of maximising their development impact and additionality, and also taking into account debt sustainability issues. All operations should be subject to the EFSD+ governance and to the ‘policy first’ principle.

(12)In line with the NDICI proposal, the funds stemming from reflows should be primarily directed towards development instruments with high financial risks, in particular impact finance, equity funds and activity in least developed countries (LDCs). The operations should seek to maximise the development impact.

(13)Pursuant to Article 152(4) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (7), the United Kingdom’s share of the ACP Investment Facility from the EDF, accumulated through successive EDF periods, is to be reimbursed to the United Kingdom as the investment matures. Unless agreed otherwise, the United Kingdom’s capital share should not be recommitted beyond the end of the 11th EDF commitment period or rolled over into subsequent periods,