Considerations on COM(2005)285 - Authorisation of the Netherlands to derogate from Article 11 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
dossier COM(2005)285 - Authorisation of the Netherlands to derogate from Article 11 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation ...
document COM(2005)285 EN
date February 27, 2006
 
table>(1)By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 4 October 2004, the Kingdom of the Netherlands sought authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
(2)In accordance with Article 27(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 1 December 2004 of the request made by the Kingdom of the Netherlands. By letter dated 2 December 2004, the Commission notified the Kingdom of the Netherlands that it had all the information it considered necessary for appraisal of the request.

(3)The aim of the derogation is to prevent the avoidance of value added tax (VAT) through the undervaluation of supplies between connected persons, where the recipient is not entitled to full or almost full deduction of VAT. It is designed to circumvent abuses in the supply of capital items or in the supply of services in relation to capital items, such as leasing or letting or any other arrangement whereby the goods are put at the disposal of the recipient. Because of the relationship between the parties, the consideration is often fixed at a non-market value, resulting in significantly lower VAT revenues.

(4)The special measure should apply only in cases where the administration is able to conclude that the taxable amount, as determined in accordance with Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, has been influenced by the relationship between the parties. That conclusion should, in each case, be based on manifest facts, not presumptions.

(5)It is therefore appropriate and proportionate to permit the Kingdom of the Netherlands to treat the open-market value of those supplies as the taxable amount.

(6)The derogations pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC which counter avoidance of VAT linked to the taxable amount of supplies between related parties are included in a proposal for a Directive rationalising some of the derogations pursuant to that Article. It is therefore necessary to cause the application period of this derogation to end when that Directive enters into force.

(7)The derogation has no adverse impact on the Communities' own resources accruing from VAT,