Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2021)28 - Amendment of Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic registers

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.



1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Reasons for and objectives of the proposal

Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 1 lays down the legal basis for administrative cooperation between Member States.

This proposal accompanies Chapter V of Council Directive 2020/262 2 . It concerns the content of the registers in the electronic database maintained by Member States in relation to the certified consignors and certified consignees sending or receiving goods only occasionally.

For a certified consignor or certified consignee sending or receiving excise goods only occasionally, Member States can give them a temporary certification limited to a specified quantity of excise goods, a single consignee or consignor and a specified period of time.

The proposal sets out the information to be introduced in the registers maintained by the Member States as regards to the certified consignors and certified consignees moving goods only occasionally. This information concerns the quantity of goods, the identity of the eonomic operator at the end of the movement of the goods and the duration of the temporary certification.

Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

The proposal is linked to Council Directive (EU) 2020/262, which defines certified consignors and certified consignees. Certified consignors and certified consignees are the economic operators involved in the movement of excise goods that have been released for consumption in the territory of one Member State and then moved to the territory of another Member State. The objective of this proposal is to widen the scope of Article 19 of Council Regulation EU (No) 389/2012 in order to set out the information to be introduced by the Member States in the registers of these economic operators when moving excise goods only occasionally.

Consistency with other Union policies

This amendment is very technical and subsequently has no impact on other Union policies.

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY

Legal basis

The proposal is based on Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). This article provides for the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with the special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, to adopt provisions for the harmonisation of Member States' rules in the area of indirect taxation.

Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)

The subsidiarity principle applies insofar as the proposal does not fall under the exclusive competence of the European Union.

The objectives of the proposal cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can be better achieved at European Union level. Existing national registration procedures vary widely and are not suitable as a basis for automation of these procedures.

Proportionality

The proposed amendment does not go beyond what is necessary to address the issues at stake and, in that way, to achieve the Treaty's objectives of a proper and effective functioning of the Internal Market.

This proposal complies with the principles of proportionality as set out in Article 5, paragraph 4 of the Treaty on the European Union.

The objective of the proposal is to introduce the obligations of Member States regarding economic operators moving goods under Chapter V, section 2 of Council Directive (EU) 2020/262. In the absence of that proposal the full automation of movements of goods released for consumption will not be possible.

Choice of the instrument

Council Regulation.

3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Impact assessment

The impact assessment was prepared for the recast of Directive 2008/118/EC. Council Directive 2008/118/EC setting out general arrangements for goods subject to excise duty, after being substantially amended several times, in the interests of clarity, was repealed by Council Directive (EU) 2020/262. The proposal for the recast was accompanied by an impact assessment on Council Directive 2008/118/EC focusing on certain areas, one of which was the automation of intra-EUmovements of excise goods released for consumption. Council Directive (EU) 2020/262 addresses the computerisation of movements of excise goods released for consumption by the certified consignors and certified consignees, not provided for in Directive 2008/118/EC, and also sets out the conditions for the temporary certification when certified consignors or certified consignees are moving excise goods only occasionally.

Regulatory fitness and simplification

The evaluation of Directive 2008/118/EC was carried out within the framework of the Commission’s REFIT programme.

Fundamental rights

This proposal respects the fundamental rights, particularly the right to privacy though the existing provision on data protection contained in Regulation (EU) No 389/2012.

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

No additional resources will be required from the EU budget.

5. OTHER ELEMENTS

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal


The proposal amends the scope of Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 to include the information that Member States must introduce in the registers of the electronic database in relation to the certified consignors and certified consignees who are moving excise goods only occasionally and are granted a temporary certification.

For the registered consignors, the competent authorities of the Member States must include in the register the content of the temporary certification namely the quantity of excise goods, the identity of the consignee in the Member State of destination and the period of time for which the authorisation is valid.

For the registered consignees, the competent authorities of the Member States must include in the register the content of the temporary certification namely the quantity of excise goods, the identity of the consignor in the Member State of dispatch, and the period of time for which the authorisation is valid.