Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2019)545 - EU position at the 39th session of the Executive Body under the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2019)545 - EU position at the 39th session of the Executive Body under the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. |
---|---|
source | COM(2019)545 |
date | 23-10-2019 |
1. Subject matter of the proposal
This proposal concerns the decision establishing the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the Executive Body of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (the Air Convention) in connection with the decision on proposed amendments of Article 3bis and Annex VII to the Air Convention Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone (as amended 2012).
2. Context of the proposal
2.1.The Air Convention and its Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone (as amended 2012)
The UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (the ‘Air Convention’), adopted in 1979, is the most advanced regional environmental agreement addressing clean air policy.
Under the Air Convention, the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone (the ‘Gothenburg Protocol’) was agreed in November 1999. It forms the basis for Directive (EC) 2016/2284 1 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants that repealed Directive 2001/81/EC 2 on national emission ceilings. The Gothenburg Protocol was amended in 2012. The amended version entered into force on 7 October 2019.
The European Union is a Party to the Air Convention 3 and to the Gothenburg Protocol as amended in 2012 4 . All Member States are Parties to the Air Convention; 21 Member States are Parties to the Gothenburg Protocol 5 and 15 Member States have so far accepted the 2012 amendment to the Gothenburg Protocol 6 .
2.2.The Executive Body
The Executive Body is the governing body of the Air Convention and is composed of representatives of Parties to the Convention. Pursuant to Article 10 of the Air Convention, the Executive Body shall review the implementation and development of the Air Convention and its Protocols.
The Executive Body aims to reach its decisions by consensus. 7
Amendments to the Gothenburg Protocol shall be adopted by consensus of the Parties present at a session of the Executive Body. 8
2.3.The envisaged decision of the Executive Body
On 9-13 December 2019, during its 39th session, the Executive Body will discuss and potentially adopt amendments proposed by the USA to Article 3bis and Annex VII of the amended Gothenburg Protocol (‘the envisaged act’).
The purpose of the envisaged act is to extend the possibility for countries in the Eastern European, Caucasus and Central Asian (EECCA) region to apply a flexible timescale for meeting certain obligations, to facilitate their ratification of the Gothenburg Protocol.
The envisaged act will become binding for the Parties:
- in accordance with Article 13bis of the Gothenburg Protocol, which provides that amendments to the Protocol shall enter into force for the Parties, which have accepted them on the ninetieth day after the date on which two thirds of those that were Parties at the time of the adoption have deposited their acceptance instruments. 9
- For those Parties having accepted it, a different procedure is foreseen in respect of amendments to annexes IV to XI of the Gothenburg Protocol: such amendments shall become effective one year from the date of communication of the decision to all Parties, except for those Parties that notify the depositary that they are unable to approve the amendment. In the case of 16 or more Parties submitting such a notification, the amendment shall not enter into force 10 .
In practice, the proposed amendments will not affect the obligations for Member States since the obligations in question are already part of the EU acquis and applied by Member States. The proposed amendments would however provide a possibility for non-EU Parties, notably in the EECCA region, to continue to use the flexibility already negotiated and agreed as part of the 2012 amendment of the Gothenburg Protocol, for a prolonged period.
3. Position to be taken on the Union's behalf
The flexible timescales in Article 3bis and Annex VII of the amended Gothenburg Protocol were agreed and adopted in 2012 with the purpose of providing a simplified entry mechanism to encourage ratification by more Parties. By August 2019, no single EECCA country had yet managed to make use of this flexibility. Following discussions about existing ratification barriers for EECCA countries, the Air Convention Parties at the Working Group on Strategy and Review meeting on 20-24 May 2019 therefore voiced their interest in addressing and extending these flexible timescales.
Without the extension of the flexibility, it is deemed unlikely that EECCA countries will ratify the Protocol in the near future. It is in the interest of the EU that neighbourhood countries ratify the Gothenburg Protocol to help decrease the transboundary air pollution coming from EECCA countries to the EU Member States.
The Directive (EU) 2016/2284 provisions mirror the obligations of the Gothenburg Protocol.
4. Legal basis
4.1.Procedural legal basis
4.1.1.Principles
Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for decisions establishing ‘the positions to be adopted on the Union’s behalf in a body set up by an agreement, when that body is called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, with the exception of acts supplementing or amending the institutional framework of the agreement.’
The concept of ‘acts having legal effects’ includes acts that have legal effects by virtue of the rules of international law governing the body in question. It also includes instruments that do not have a binding effect under international law, but that are ‘capable of decisively influencing the content of the legislation adopted by the EU legislature’ 11 .
4.1.2.Application to the present case
The Executive Body is a body set up by an agreement, namely the Air Convention.
The act, which the Executive Body is called upon to adopt, constitutes an act having legal effects. The envisaged act will be binding under international law in accordance with Article 13bis of the Gothenburg Protocol.
The envisaged act does not supplement or amend the institutional framework of the Air Convention or of the Gothenburg Protocol.
Therefore, the procedural legal basis for the proposed decision is Article 218(9) TFEU.
4.2.Substantive legal basis
4.2.1.Principles
The substantive legal basis for a decision under Article 218(9) TFEU depends primarily on the objective and content of the envisaged act in respect of which a position is taken on the Union’s behalf. If the envisaged act pursues two aims or has two components and if one of those aims or components is identifiable as the main one, whereas the other is merely incidental, the decision under Article 218(9) TFEU must be founded on a single substantive legal basis, namely that required by the main or predominant aim or component.
4.2.2.Application to the present case
The main objective and content of the envisaged act relate to the environment.
Therefore, the substantive legal basis of the proposed decision is Article 191 TFEU.
4.3.Conclusion
The legal basis of the proposed decision should be Article 191 TFEU in conjunction with Article 218(9) TFEU.
5. Publication of the envisaged act
As the act of the Executive Body will amend the Gothenburg Protocol under the Air Convention, it is appropriate to publish it in the Official Journal of the European Union after its adoption.