Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2018)786 - EU position concerning an amendment to Annex IX (Financial Services) to the EEA Agreement (Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR))

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.



1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Reasons for and objectives of the proposal

The draft Decision of the EEA Joint Committee (annexed to the proposed Council Decision) aims to amend Annex IX (Financial Services) to the EEA Agreement in order to incorporate the Central Securities Depositories Regulation 1 into the EEA Agreement.

The adaptations appearing in the drafts of the annexed Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee go beyond what can be considered mere technical adaptations in the sense of the Council Regulation No 2894/94.The Union position shall therefore be established by the Council.

Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

The annexed draft EEA Joint Committee Decision extends the already existing EU policy to the EEA EFTA States (Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein).

Consistency with other Union policies

The extension of the EU acquis to the EEA EFTA States, through its incorporation into the EEA Agreement is conducted in conformity with the objectives and principles of that Agreement, aiming at establishing a dynamic and homogeneous European Economic Area, based on common rules and equal conditions of competition.

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY

Legal basis

The legislation to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement is based on Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Article 1(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 2 concerning arrangements for implementing the EEA Agreement provides that the Council establishes the position to be adopted on the Union’s behalf on such Decisions, on a proposal from the Commission.

The EEAS with the Commission services submit the draft Decisions of the EEA Joint Committee for adoption by the Council as the Union’s position. The EEAS would hope to be able to present them in the EEA Joint Committee at the earliest possible opportunity.

Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)

The proposal complies with the subsidiarity principle for the following reason.

The objective of this proposal, namely to ensure the homogeneity of the Internal Market, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the effects, be better achieved at Union level.

The process of incorporation of the EU acquis into the EEA Agreement is conducted in conformity with the Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area which confirms the approach taken.

Proportionality

In accordance with the principle of proportionality, this proposal does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve its objective.

Choice of the instrument

In conformity with Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the chosen instrument is the EEA Joint Committee decision. The EEA Joint Committee shall ensure the effective implementation and operation of the EEA Agreement. To this end, it shall take decisions in the cases provided for in the EEA Agreement.

3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Not applicable

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

There are no budgetary implications expected as a result of incorporation of the above mentioned Regulation into the EEA Agreement.

5. OTHER ELEMENTS

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal

Liechtenstein’s situation (adaptation 3(c))

Liechtenstein and Switzerland are linked by a dense network of treaties, including notably the Customs Treaty of 1923, and the Currency Treaty of 1980 pursuant to which Liechtenstein (already using the Swiss Franc as its official currency since 1921) is included in the currency area of Switzerland. In the financial services sector, the Currency Treaty provides for the direct applicability of certain Swiss legal and administrative rules (cf. Annexes to the Currency Treaty). As a result, certain financial intermediaries (e.g. banks, investment undertakings) must comply with reporting requirements of the Swiss National Bank (SNB) for the purpose of enabling it to conduct monetary policy. The common economic and currency area has historically led to strong economic ties between the two countries that persisted after Liechtenstein’s accession to the EEA Agreement.

For these reasons, the Liechtenstein financial market is fully integrated with and relies extensively on Swiss financial market infrastructures. Any disruption of the current setup may lead to challenges for Liechtenstein financial market participants. Adaptation 3(c) therefore provides that third-country Central Securities Depositories already providing services referred to in Article 25(2) of the CSDR Regulation to financial intermediaries in Liechtenstein or already having set up a branch in Liechtenstein may be allowed to continue to provide the services referred to in Article 25(2) for a period not exceeding 5 years after the date of entry into force of the annexed draft Decision of the EEA Joint Committee.