Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2018)383 - Rights and Values programme

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

dossier COM(2018)383 - Rights and Values programme.
source COM(2018)383 EN
date 30-05-2018
1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

This proposal provides for a date of application as of 1 January 2021 and is presented for a Union of 27 Member States, in line with the notification by the United Kingdom of its intention to withdraw from the European Union and Euratom based on Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union received by the European Council on 29 March 2017.

Reasons and objectives

The European Union’s aim is to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its people.

The Union is a community of law, and its values constitute the very basis of its existence. These values are enshrined in the EU Treaties, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

In particular, Article 2 of the Treaty of the European Union states that ‘ the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and the respect for human rights, including the rights of the persons belonging to minorities.

These values are common to the Member States in a society where pluralism, nondiscrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail’. Article 3 further specifies that the Union ’s aim is to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its people and, among others, it shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity, and shall ensure that Europe’s cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced’. Along these lines, the Commission s reflection paper on the future of EU finances states that

‘the EU budget supports this aim, working together with national budgets and complementing other efforts at European and national level .

Those values encompass in particular fundamental rights, non - discri m inati on and equality, anti-racism and tolerance, the respect for human dignity, the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, cultural diversity, a vibrant civil society, freedom of expression and citizen participation in democratic life.

Furthermore, a sense of belonging to a common cultural heritage, memory and remembrance is a necessary pre-condition for participating in a democratic community and removing stereotypes and divisions between Europeans.

This Commission has set a Union of democratic change as one of its ten political priorities and is working in that context to engage citizens about what the EU does and the way it functions and to build trust in the Union.

EU finances can provide added value and help to uphold common European values.

To promote common European values and rights, the EU has combined several instruments in a policy mix of legislation, policies and funding. In particular, the following funding programmes have showed a strong societal focus and are clearly related to European values: the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme, the Europe for Citizens programme, and the Justice programme.

T hese programmes have led to real, progress in promoting values and implementing the set of rights that EU legislation grants to people across the Union.

To give some examples, people are more aware of their rights, common history and culture, more women are in work, children s rights have been promoted and protected, justice systems are more effective with legal practitioners knowing how and when to apply EU acquis and


with a thriving cross-border cooperation, there is more democratic and civic participation at Union level, and a deeper understanding of and respect for different memories, cultures and traditions.

Under Union law, people can rely on a set of rights, on an independent and effective justice system and the respect of the rule of law. Through dedicated funds, the EU has shown its firm commitment to combatting violence against women and children, fighting all forms of discrimination, promoting and protecting the rights of persons with disabilities and supporting a vibrant and strong civil society in the EU.

Despite the progress achieved under the current programmes, several gaps persist in the policy areas in question and new challenges have emerged that need to be tackled.

The common challenges the EU faces with justice, rights and values are twofold:

– The Union’s vocation to be a community based on shared values and rights, a shared historical and cultural heritage and people’s involvement is hampered by some emerging movements which challenge the idea of open, inclusive, cohesive and democratic societies where civic participation and the enjoyment of rights make it possible to build a tolerant way of living together.

– The fragmented nature and limited resources of current EU funding programmes dedicated to values, rights, citizenship and justice limits the EU’s capacity to respond to existing and new challenges. ‘Lack of budget of the programmes to satisfy demand’ is a main obstacle that the respondents to the public consultation say could prevent the current programmes from achieving their objectives.

A more detailed analysis also shows the following:

– People still do not fully enjoy their rights: inequalities and discrimination on the grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation still exist. Violence is still a reality in the daily lives of many women, children and other people at risk.

– There is more to be done to make sure that citizens are aware of the values of the EU and the benefits of EU citizenship, and to encourage a higher level of political and societal participation and better understanding of the Union, its history, cultural heritage and diversity;

– The rights stemming from EU citizenship — on free movement, consular protection and electoral rights — are still not fully known and implemented, thus hindering citizens’ political and societal participation.

– Economic crises, persisting inequalities and challenges such as of migration have led some to question the fundamental rights and the values on which the European Union is founded are being put to the test. In some cases, the rule of law, access to justice, space for civil society and the independence of the judiciary are also being challenged.

– Judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters is insufficient, and access to justice across Member States is still difficult. Tools for collecting comparative information about the quality, independence and efficiency of Member States’ justice systems need to be improved. A main obstacle to mutual recognition and judicial cooperation is the lack of trust in the judicial systems of other Member States.

The consequences of not addressing these challenges could be serious as confidence in democracy and support for upholding values and fundamental rights would be weakened.

These challenges are common to all Member States and have cross-border dimensions. While action at national level is important, individual Member States alone do not have sufficient leverage to tackle these challenges.

Promoting and defending EU values and rights has profound implications for the political, social, cultural, judicial and economic life of the Union and contributes to the EU having a tangible impact on people’s day-to-day lives. EU-level action at in this area needs to be sustained and stepped up in order to address persisting gaps and new challenges, and ensure the promotion, effective protection and respect of rights and values; this will also help to complete the internal market and foster prosperity and cohesion in the EU. It will also allow the EU to play a key role in defending and promoting its values at global level and contribute to the UN’s sustainable development goals.

In the light of the above, the new funding programme ‘Rights and Values’ will aim at protecting and promoting rights and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties and in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, including by supporting civil society organisations, in order to sustain open, democratic and inclusive societies.

This new programme, together with the Justice programme, will be part of a new Justice, Rights and Values Fund of the EU budget that will help to sustain open, democratic, pluralist and inclusive societies. It will also help to empower people by protecting and promoting rights and values and by further developing an EU area of justice.

Consistency

with existing policy provisions

The Justice Rights and Values Fund contributes directly to several of the European Commission s priorities , in particular, the creation of an area of justice and fundamental rights based on mutual trust, a deeper and fairer internal market and a Union of democratic change, growth and jobs.

The new programme is consistent with the European Pillar of Social Rights, jointly proclaimed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 17 November 2017. The Pillar is about delivering new and more effective rights for citizens, building upon 20 key principles including among others gender equality, equal opportunities, support to children or inclusion of people with disabilities.

Citizenship is a good policy field for developing synergies between the current funding programmes for education, culture and EU citizenship. Stronger synergies between the Europe for Citizens pro gra mm e and the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme could be achieved through closer thematic cooperation, for example in the area of anti-racism, equality, cultural heritage, remembrance and cultural diversity. Remembrance activities, town-twinning or pan-European networks are intended to broaden perspectives and develop a sense of European belonging and European identity.

Consistency with other Union policies

The Justice, Rights and Values fund and its two underlying funding programmes will help to strengthen and uphold EU values and the respect of the rule of law and to sustain the open, democratic, inclusive and creative societies which Europeans expect. Already under current rules, Member States are required to show that their rules and procedures for financial management of EU money are robust and funding is sufficiently protected from abuse or fraud. Only an inde pend ent jud iciary that upholds the rule of law and legal certainty in all


2

Member States can ultimately guarantee that money from the EU budget is sufficiently protected.

On the basis of Article 322 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Commission has proposed a Regulation on the protection of the Unions budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States. The new Regulation will complement the instruments aiming at upholding EU common values, including this programme.

The Rights and Values programme will fund policies dealing with values and rights and have at its core people s lives and participation. In that respect, it will have close synergies with several policies and their funding programmes. The following synergies are worth highlighting:

Synergies with employment, social and education policies

The future European Social Fund plus will be a major building block of the ‘Investing in People and Values cluster. This building block will provide support to citizens by investing in: human capital, (youth) employment, social innovation, the acquisition of basic digital skills, the integration of migrants, the social inclusion of the most deprived, and a high level of human health protection. Potential synergies will be developed or strengthened, in particular to promote gender equality and equal opportunities for under-represented groups such as the Roma, and to promote social justice, EU values and the respect of fundamental ri ghts.

Synergies with the Erasmus+ programme can be strengthened, given that Erasmus+ also

1.

supports disadvantaged groups ----- such as youngsters with disabilities ----- gain better access to


education, it supports actions that aim to achieve stronger social inclusion and it aims to promote common values through education. Already existing synergies with Creative Europe will be maintained and reinforced, in particular as regards cultural heritage and cultural diversity.

Synergies with external, development cooperation and enlargement policies

The promotion of values and rights within the EU is mirrored by their promotion at the global level, including through the linkages with the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. In this respect, synergies need to be developed, in particular with the EU S external action at multilateral level but also in development cooperation aid and in enlargement policy, to ensure coherence in the promotion of human rights, the rule of law gender equality, antidiscrimination, tolerance..

— Synergies with the Single Market

The future Single Market programme will provide support to citizens and consumers in the internal market, thus helping to enhance their rights and empower them. In this respect, it will complement the actions funded by the Rights and Values programme which has a strong focus on empowering people.

By financing activities involving company law, contract law and anti-money laundering, the future Single Market programme will complement the Justice programme and contribute directly to the implementation of EU justice policy and the creation of an EU area of justice. The same is valid for consumer policy.

Synergies with migration, border management and security

2.

The Rights and Values programme will help to address the different challenges that are undermining social cohesion in the EU. T his programme will support activities to combat and


prevent racism, xenophobia, hate speech and violent extremism, thus also contributing to the fight against radicalisation and terrorism more broadly. By promoting and protecting the rights of the child in vulnerable situations (including migration), preventing violence against women and children and supporting actions combating discrimination, this programme also contributes to priorities and objectives related to the better management of migration, the promotion of inclusion and addressing trafficking in human beings.

– Synergies with environmental policy

The coverage of health-related matters in the Rights and Values Programme will complement the coverage of health-related matters under EU environmental policy, including measures with an environmental health dimension under the LIFE Regulation3.

Climate mainstreaming

The Commission proposal for the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework set a more ambitious goal for climate mainstreaming across all EU programmes, with an overall target of 25% of EU expenditure contributing to climate objectives. The contribution of this programme to the achievement of this overall target will be tracked through an EU climate marker system at an appropriate level of disaggregation, including the use of more precise methodologies where these are available. The Commission will continue to present the information annually in terms of commitment appropriations in the context of the annual draft budget.

To support the full utilisation of the potential of the programme to contribute to climate objectives, the Commission will seek to identify relevant actions throughout the programme preparation, implementation, review and evaluation processes.

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY

Legal basis

The proposal is based on Articles 16 i, 19 i, 21 i, 24, 167(5) and 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The combination of these articles is necessary to continue supporting policies which are developed and implemented in the current programmes. It is not meant to extend activities to new policy areas. The combination of more than one Article is necessary to achieve the programme s general objectives in a comprehensive way and to adopt a simplified and more efficient approach to funding.

Under Article 16 i TFEU, the Union has the power to adopt measures relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and by Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of Union law, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data. This Treaty provision is a legal basis for this proposal.

Article 19 i provides for the adoption of incentive measures to support Member State action in combating discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, including activities promoting equality between women and men and supporting the rights of the child. This Treaty provision is a legal basis for this proposal.

3.

Regulation (EU) No 1293/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the establishment of a Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) and repealing


3

Article 21(2) TFEU provides for Union measures to facilitate the exercise of citizens rights to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States. Act ions to inform citizens and authorities about the rights to diplomatic and consular protection and about their voting rights can also be covered by this Article since in practice they facilitate the exercise of a citizen’s right to move and reside freely.

Democratic engagement, civic participation and the fostering of civil society are essential building blocks of the notion of EU citizenship and the right to move and reside freely in the EU as defined in Article 21(1). In this regard, they constitute crucial factors and facilitators of the right to move and reside freely in the EU.

Article 24 TFEU provides for citizens' ini ti atives withi n the meaning of Article 11 TEU. The former is a legal basis for this proposal to the extent that it provides for the financing of the technical and organisational support to implement Regulation [(EU) No 211/2011 ], thereby underpinning the exercise by citizens of their right to launch and support European citizens i nitiatives.

Article 167 TFEU tasks the Union to contribute to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and by bringing forward the common cultural heritage. The actions by the Union shall encourage co-operation between Member States and supplement their actions in areas such as, inter alia, improvement of the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the European peoples and conservation and safeguarding of cultural heritage of European significance. Article 167(5) TFEU is therefore a legal basis for this proposal.

Article 168 TFEU provides for a high level of human health protection and Union action complementing national policies in preventing physical and mental illness and obviating sources of danger to physical and mental health. Violence, including against children and women, constitutes a danger to physical and mental health. Children are vulnerable citizens and need an increased level of protection against these dangers often include cross-border threats. Violence against women also constitutes a serious threat to the physical and mental health of victims, who are in need of a high level of protect ion. Article 168 TFEU is therefore a legal basis for this proposal.

Subsidiarity (for non - e xcl usive competence)

The promotion and protection of values requires transnational cooperation mechanisms and networking opportunities. Member States acting alone typically cannot achieve this.

In many areas, such as equality and non - discri m inati on or citizenship, individuals are protected by Union law and legislation but are not sufficiently aware of their rights. Only by raising awareness, sharing best practices and providing training at EU level will it be possible to reach persons in all Member States, inform administrative structures/authorities and convey a consistent message. At the same time, acting at EU level produces economies of scale, ensures the quality of the actions and guarantees that Member States have a consistent interpretation and coherent application of legislative instruments throughout the EU.

Funding at national or regional level for activities promoting EU citizen participation is very limited, and in many EU countries there is even less funding for remembrance activities. Even where beneficiaries receive funding for similar activities, alternative funding sources do not

give priority to promoting citizenship and remembrance at EU level. Stakeholders’ limited or

inexistent ability to conduct similar projects without the support of EU funding highlights the level of reliance of beneficiaries on such funds.

Proportionality

The proposal complies with the principle of proportionality, in that it does not go beyond the minimum required to achieve the stated objective at European level and what is necessary for that purpose.

3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER

CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Retrospective evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation

The mid-term evaluation of the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme shows that the problems and drivers underlying the programme s general objective and specific objectives are still relevant. The overall support needs identified at the start of the REC programme have not been fully met and continue to be relevant. Overall, the REC programme is appropriately addressing the relevant groups but a more systematic analysis of their needs should be carried out in the implementation. In addition, issues regarding equity (distribution of funds across the groups of beneficiaries, involvement of equality bodies, gender m ai nstream i ng, mai nstreaming of rights of the child and rights of people with disabilities) in programming, implementation and monitoring have also been identified. Also, a coordination and information exchange between EU programmes and projects would be instrumental to further their coherence.

Progress in implementing the REC programme has been satisfactory in terms of financial implementation and the programme activities’ outreach to participants. Analysis of what the REC programme has accomplished shows that the groups participating in the activities funded by the programme now have a better understanding of Union law and policies. Beneficiaries gave a largely positive assessment of the activities in which they participated although there is scope to improve this s usta in abi lity . The range of communication activities to promote the REC programme has been largely successful. However, efforts need to continue to ensure all potential applicants in all Member States are reached. A key achievement of the new programme, compared to prior programmes, has been the lower burden on beneficiaries in terms of time and money: beneficiaries surveyed report that both the preparation of the proposals and the implementation of the activities have become less burdensome.

The types of implementing measures (operating grants, action grants, direct grants and procurement) are in line with the programme s objectives and with the needs of stakeholders eligible for support. The REC funding regulation provided great flexibility with the use of restricted calls, especially when it came to implementing large-scale awareness campaigns on data protection and the prevention of violence Beneficiaries of the programme raised concerns regarding the efficiency of the application process, implementation and reporting duties and mechanisms. Simplification is an area where room for improvement remains.

T he evaluations and studies of the Europe for Citizens programme these past 10 years have shown that the programme has played an im portant role as the only EU programme directly targeting citizens and involving them through a bottom-up approach. The mid-term evaluation of the Europe for Citizens 2014-2020 programme showed that its objectives were and remain

relevant to the problems to be addressed, i.e. to contribute to citizens’ understanding of the

Union, its shared history and diversity, and to foster European citizenship and improve conditions for civic and democratic participation at Union level. These two strands are not only complementary but mutually supportive because of the connection between lessons learned from the past and plans made for the future of Europe. The high number of direct and indirect participants that Europe for Citizens has reached illustrates that the programme has been effective at a relatively low cost. At the same time, the high demand from grant applicants shows that there is scope for additional funding, and this was requested by

stakeholders consulted during the evaluation. In its March 2017 report on the implementation of the Europe for Citizens 2014-2020 programme, the European Parliament expressed its strong support for the programme and called for a substantial budgetary increase. Europe for Citizens has demonstrated its added value at EU level thanks to its impact on participants and its role as a complement to other EU funding programmes and policy initiatives on education, culture and EU citizenship. Aspects that have been identified for improvement include in particular increasing the programme’s visibility, revising the monitoring indicators and developing stronger synergies with other relevant EU funding programmes and initiatives.

Stakeholder

consultations

The consultation strategy supporting this preparatory work for the programme included: (i) a public consultation on values and mobility and on the proposal for the post-2020 multiannual financial framework; (ii) public consultations for the mid-term evaluation of the current funding programmes; and (iii) several ad hoc consultations that the Commission organised in the form of roundtable discussions with stakeholders, conferences and seminars.

The open public consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility

Consultations have taken place in the context of evaluations of existing EU financial programmes covering several policy areas and notably looked at current performance and future challenges. The purpose of the public consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility was to collect the views of all interested parties on how to make the most of every euro of the EU budget. T he public consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility was open from 10 January 2018 to 9 March 2018 in 23 official EU languages.

In response to the online public consultation on EU funds in the area of values and mobility, the Commission received a tota l of 1 839 replies from all over Europe. Of these, 52% were from respondents with experience of Erasmus+ and 43% were from respondents with experience of the Creative Europe programme.

There was at least one response from each Member State, The country of residence with the most contributions overall was Germany (24.4%), followed by France (8.7%), Belgium (7.7%) and Spain (5.4%).

Of the 1 839 contributions received via the online questionnaire, 65.2 % (1 199) were from organisations and 34.8 % (640) from individuals.

A wide range of stakeholders shared their opinions: of the 1 199 contributions from organisations, 355 (19.3%) were from n on - g ov ernm ental organisations, platforms or networks, 270 (14.7%) from private enterprises (mainly micro and small businesses) and 127 (6.9%) from researchers and academics.

The analysis summed up below focuses on the respondents with experience of the following EU programmes:

4.

1. Europe for Citizens programme and/or


5.

2. Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme and/or


6.

3. Creative Europe programme and/or


4. Justice programme.

Below are some of the main results:

- According to the respondents, ‘Promoting European identity and common values

and promoting rights and equality are important common policy challenges (among the first four challenges mentioned) to be addressed in each of the four

programmes. ‘Supporting active citizenship, democratic participation in society and the rule of law’ and ‘Promoting social inclusion and fairness’ also appear to be important challenges to be addressed in the relevant programmes but to a lesser extent in the Creative Europe programme, for which economic challenges and cultural diversity are more important.

‘Supporting innovation’, ‘Fostering European cultural diversity and cultural heritage’, ‘Promoting European identity and common values’ are considered policies that address fully or fairly well the challenges faced by half or more of the respondents with experience of the four programmes concerned. Also, 52 % of the respondents with experience of the Creative Europe programme consider that the policy to ‘Support competitiveness of European cultural and creative sectors’ addresses the challenges fully or fairly well.

Around 80 % of the respondents with experience of the four EU programmes mentioned above agree that these programmes add value to a large extent or to a fairly good extent to what Member States could achieve at national, regional and/or local level.

The main obstacles identified by the respondents that could prevent the current programmes/funds from achieving their objectives are very similar regardless of the programme concerned: ‘Lack of budget of the programmes to satisfy demand’; ‘Insufficient support provided to small-scale stakeholders’; ‘Lack of support to first-time applicants’ are identified as the main three obstacles.

7.

Respondents with experience of one or more of the four EU programmes agree that


‘the use of more simplified application forms’, ‘facilitating structured network and partnerships’, ‘facilitating funding for actions cutting across the sectors of action’ and ‘better coordination between different programmes/funds’ are the main steps to be taken to simplify and reduce the administrative burden for beneficiaries.

Impact

assessment

The impact assessment was prepared to analyse a possible European Culture, Rights and Values programme merging the 2014-2020 Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme, the Europe for Citizens programme and the Creative Europe programme — and the Justice programme. The Commission decided to have a self-standing Creative Europe programme and to create a Justice, Rights and Values Fund with two underlying funding programmes: the Justice programme and the Rights and Values programme. The impact assessment remains valid in underpinning all these initiatives.

On 20 April 2018, the Regulatory Scrutiny Board gave a positive opinion on the accompanying impact assessment. The Board included a recommendation to further improve the report, some key aspects of this being full exploitation of the evaluation results and findings outcomes, a better design of the future priorities and clarification of the expected impacts of the changes in delivery mechanisms. These aspects were strengthened in the final version of the impact assessment. The impact assessment compiled the lessons learned from the Creative Europe programme, the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme, the Europe for Citizens programme and the Justice programme and proposed a new structure. It also explored delivery mechanisms that will promote EU values and culture while achieving the objectives of efficiency, flexibility, synergies and simplification set for the next multiannual financial framework. The results of the mid-term evaluation have been duly taken into account. All the programmes evaluated have shown clear added value. With the new

clustering, it will be possible to further exploit the potential of current programmes to promote EU values and increase EU added value.

Three main scenarios were analysed:

– The status quo of maintaining four funding programmes under the ‘values’ sub-cluster of the EU budget, namely the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme, the Justice programme, the Creative Europe programme and the Europe for Citizens programme.

– As an alternative to the current situation and baseline scenario, the second scenario proposed developing synergies among the current programmes and combining them to form a single political chapeau on EU values with two underlying funding programmes: the European Culture, Rights and Values programme and the Justice programme.

– A third scenario involved the creation of one single funding programme covering all four funding programmes listed above.

The baseline scenario: the status quo with four funding programmes and a proportional 15 % budgetary cut

Analysis of the baseline scenario with a possible 15 % cut in the available funding shows that there would be negative consequences for policy implementation. In particular:

A 15 % reduction in funding for the REC programme would result in an annual prioritisation, i.e. concentration of funding in some policy areas in one year and promotion of other policy areas in the following years, in contradiction with the increasing needs in the field. This reduction would also mean cutting back on studies, data collection, awareness-raising campaigns etc., all necessary to have sound, evidence-based policy and legislation.

For the Europe for Citizens programme, a budgetary cut of 15 % would reduce the baseline budget to €157 million, which is insufficient for the Commission’s commitment to put citizens at the centre of the European process. The critical mass of participants and the geographical coverage of activities necessary to achieve the intended impact would no longer be reached. A stable budgetary allocation (based on the 2017 budget) would allow continuity but still have limited impact.

A decrease of 15 % in funding for the MEDIA sub-programme of Creative Europe would inevitably mean streamlining and concentrating on a limited number of actions. A reduction in funding would disproportionately impact lower production countries and/or countries with a restricted geographic/linguistic area. It would also reduce the number of training activities for audiovisual professionals and the number of EU co-productions, which are works that travel better across borders. Reducing the scope of the network of cinema operators would negatively impact the access of EU citizens, notably from Central and Eastern European countries, to non-national European content.

A decrease of 15 % for the Culture sub-programme of Creative Europe would not make it possible to reach a critical mass to respond to the needs of the cultural and creative sectors. This would imply in particular less European added value and therefore a reduced impact on cultural diversity, fewer opportunities for cross-border cooperation, fewer market opportunities and fewer career possibilities for practitioners from the cultural and creative sectors. The societal impact would be reduced, and the international opening of the programme might need to be limited to its pre-2014 level and the participation of key EU neighbouring partner countries abandoned.

The Financial Guarantee for the cultural and creative sectors could be put at risk, which would be detrimental to the cultural and creative sectors, especially for eastern countries whose financial markets are less developed and where therefore there are therefore fewer possibilities to access to finance.

Discarded alternative in the impact assessment: one programme

For reasons related to the legal basis, the alternative proposed in the third scenario of a single instrument/programme has been discarded. Indeed, most of the activities and policies are based on articles that provide for an ordinary legislative procedure except for the current Europe for Citizens programme. Currently, the main focus of the Europe for Citizens programme is on civic participation and is therefore based on Article 352 TFEU (unanimity). After analysis, the objectives of the corresponding activities could, if their focus was modified to a certain degree, be adapted to fit with the new approach of a broader programme; in such case, they would fall within the scope of Article 167(1) and i TFEU, which provides for the ordinary legislative procedure. However, given the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland on the area of freedom, security and justice and the position of Denmark as laid down in Protocols 21 and 22 annexed to the Treaties, the Justice programme, while also commanding the ordinary legislative procedure, needs to remain a separate instrument.

Proposed alternative in the impact assessment: an EU Values framework with two funding programmes

The analysis shows that there is room for improvement in relation to the current situation of four funding programmes. Therefore, as an alternative to the current situation and baseline scenario, it is proposed that synergies be developed among the current programmes and prerogative lines and combined into a single political chapeau on EU values with two underlying funding programmes: the European Culture, Rights and Values programme and the Justice programme, as presented below:

The new architecture of the future funding as an alternative to the baseline scenario aims at:

– developing synergies among policies, finding a common ground for action, while respecting their specific features;

– reducing overlap and fragmentation;

– ensuring flexibility in the allocation of funds, while ensuring a certain degree of predictability of funding dedicated to each policy;

– fostering cross-sectoral and innovative actions;

– ensuring a critical mass of resources to promote values, taking also into account the needs of each policy.

Retained

alternative

The Commission decided to have a self-standing Creative Europe programme and to create a Justice, Rights and Values Fund including two programmes: the Justice programme and the Rights and Values programme. The impact assessment remains valid in underpinning these initiatives. This decision is reflected in the post-2020 MFF proposal package that the Commission presented on 02 May 20184.

Simplification

8.

The proposed Rights and Values programme is the result of grouping together two funding programmes, namely the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme and the Europe for



4

Citizens programme. These programmes are small instruments, which cannot reach a critical mass and whose effectiveness is constrained by their relatively low budgets. Therefore, bringing them together will mean simplification, synergies and mutual reinforcement and will help to make them more effective.

In particular, by re-grouping citizenship activities under the same objectives, the procedures will be easier for beneficiaries who will have a single entry point for their proposals.

T he current Europe for Citizens programme has already undergone substantial simplification with measures such as lump sums and flat rates, e-form applications and grant decisions. Along these lines, simplified implementation will be sought for the policy areas funded by the Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme with measures such as lump sums, flat rates and unit costs.

The complexity and diversity of the funding rules of the current programmes represent an obstacle for applicants. Providing a single entry point for external users to participate in the grants life cycle (i.e. a participant portal), which includes a comprehensive system to manage grants, can play an important role in simplifying access to the programme. The Rights, Equality and Citizenship programme is managed through the Commission corporate system initially developed for the Horizon 2020 programme, whereas the Europe for Citizens programme may follow at a later stage. Once this migration finalised, the Rights and Values programme and its beneficiaries will benefit from this simplification.

Fundamental rights

The objectives of the Rights and Values programme are closely linked to the promotion of fundamental rights and are in line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. In particular, the new programme, together with the Justice programme, will be part of a Justice, Rights and Values Fund of the EU budget aimed at to sustaining open, democratic, and inclusive societies, empowering people by protecting and promoting rights and values and developing further an EU area of justice.

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

The financial allocation for implementing the Rights and Values programme from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027 will amount to EUR [641 705 000] (current prices).

5. OTHERELEMENTS

Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements

An implementation plan will be developed to specify the arrangements for the running of the programme.

A monitoring and evaluation plan will be developed to specify how actions are to be carried out in practice, and under what data strategy. The programme will be monitored be both continuous (e.g. to respond in a timely manner to unforeseen events and exceptional needs) and on a regular basis (to report on key events such as calls for proposals, project reviews, coordination or dissemination events) and, where relevant, the monitoring will feed into the key programme indicators. The monitoring reports will subsequently feed into:

a mid-term evaluation (no later than four years after the start of programme

9.

implementation), combined with the final evaluation of the predecessor programmes; and


a final evaluation (to be performed no later than four years after the end of the

programming period).

These evaluations will be carried out in line with paragraphs 22 and 23 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 20165 , where the three institutions confirmed that evaluations of existing legislation and policy should provide the basis for impact assessments of options for further action. The evaluations will assess the programme s effects on the ground, using the programme indicators/targets and analysing in detail the degree to which the programme can be deemed relevant, effective and efficient, provides enough EU added value and is coherent with other EU policies. The evaluations will include lessons learnt to address any shortcomings/problems identified and recommendations to take advantage of any potential to further improve the actions or their results and maximise their use/impact.

The Commission will report to the European Parliament, Council and all other relevant EU institutions regularly, through monitoring and evaluation reports and a public scoreboard of the key programme indicators.

A significant part of the programme will be implemented by the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACE A) under the supervision of the Commission services responsible for the programme.

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal

The general objective of the proposed Rights and Values programme is to protect and promote rights and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties and in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, including by supporting civil society organisations, in order to sustain open, democratic and inclusive societies . This general objective will be achieved through three specific objectives: to promote equality and rights, to promote citizen engagement and participation in the democratic life of the Union, and to fight all forms of violence. The programme will provide for and accelerate the synergies between its different specific objectives to more effectively support the policy areas these objectives cover and increase their potential to reach people. To be effective, the programme should take in to account the specific nature of the different policies, their diff erent target groups and their particular needs through tailor-made approaches.

10.

Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and


5