Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2018)71 - Conclusion of the Agreement with Switzerland on supplementary rules for the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa for the period 2014 to 2020

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.



1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Reasons for and objectives of the proposal

Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa and repealing Decision No 574/2007/EC entered into force on 21 May 2014 and became applicable as of 1 January 2014 1 .

Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 laying down general provisions on the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and on the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management also entered into force on 21 May 2014 and became applicable as of 1 January 2014 2 . Under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 515/2014, the provisions of the Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 apply to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa as part of the Internal Security Fund (hereinafter referred to as 'the ISF –Borders and Visa').

The purpose of the ISF – Borders and Visa is to establish a solidarity mechanism binding the participating states by the same European rules on the control of external borders in each other's interests and on each other's behalf. The ISF – Borders and Visa will serve to accomplish a key objective of the Schengen acquis, namely to share responsibility for an efficient, high and uniform level of control at the external borders, as set out in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council 3 . It is thus a development of the Schengen acquis.

Article 5(7) of Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 provides that the countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis participate in the instrument in accordance with its provisions and that arrangements are to be concluded on their financial contributions and the supplementary rules necessary for such participation, including provisions ensuring the protection of the Union's financial interests and the power of audit of the Court of Auditors, as the respective Association Agreements do not provide for such rules.

The aim of the draft Agreement with Switzerland (hereinafter referred to as the associated country) is to establish the arrangements referred to in Article 5(7) of Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and to enable the Commission to assume ultimate responsibility for implementation of the budget of the instrument in this associated country and determine this country's contribution to the Union budget in respect of this instrument.

As regards budgetary and financial controls, the Member States are subject to horizontal obligations (e.g. the competence of the Court of Auditors and of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)), derived either directly from the Treaty or from secondary Union legislation. These obligations apply to the Member States directly and are therefore not laid down in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014. However, in application of Article 5(7) of Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 they must be extended to the associated country by means of the draft Agreement.

In order to protect the Union's financial interests against fraud and other irregularities, Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 provides for Commission staff, the Court of Auditors and OLAF to be granted suitable access to carry out controls. Article 5(9) of Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 adds that cooperation agreements with third countries will expressly empower the Commission, the Court of Auditors and OLAF to conduct such audits, on-the-spot controls and inspections. Consequently, this is provided for in the draft Agreement.

Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

Not applicable.

Consistency with other Union policies

Not applicable.

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY

Legal basis

Having as its aim the conclusion of arrangements between the Union and Switzerland on this country's contribution to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa for the period 2014-2020 and on the supplementary rules necessary for this participation, the present proposal for the signature of the Agreement is based on Articles 77 i and 218(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The necessity for the proposed decision

On the basis of Article 5(7) of Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 the conclusion of the Agreement with Switzerland is necessary for the establishment of the arrangements on this country's contribution to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa for the period 2014-2020 and on the supplementary rules necessary for this participation.

Proportionality

Not applicable.

Choice of the instrument

Not applicable.

3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation

Not applicable.

Stakeholder consultations

Not applicable.

Collection and use of expertise

Not applicable.

Impact assessment

Not applicable, considering that the proposal is linked to the programme management and aims at signing an international agreement which was negotiated on the basis of the negotiating directives established by the Council.

Regulatory fitness and simplification

Not applicable.

Fundamental rights

Not applicable.

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

Article 10 and the Annex of the draft Agreement describe the provisions related to the annual financial contributions of the associated country to the budget of the Internal Security Fund – Borders and Visa and their possible adaptation to the situation described as per the Annex.

5. OTHER ELEMENTS

Territorial application

Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 constitutes a development of the Schengen acquis. In this regard, the present Agreement with Switzerland also builds on the Schengen acquis.

In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark annexed to the TEU and TFEU, Denmark does not take part in the adoption of this decision and will not be bound by it or be subject to its application. In accordance with Article 4 of the aforementioned Protocol, Denmark will decide within six months after the Council has adopted this proposal whether it will implement the proposed decision in its national law.

This proposal constitutes a development of elements of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom and Ireland do not take part and they will therefore not be bound or subject to its application, in accordance with Council Decisions 2000/365/EC 4 and 2002/192/EC 5  respectively.

 •Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements

Article 17 of the Agreement specifies the applicable reporting and monitoring arrangements. By 15 February each year and until 2022 included, Switzerland is to submit an annual implementation report to the Commission for the previous financial year.

Explanatory documents (for directives)

Not applicable.

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal

Not needed.

In light of the abovementioned considerations, the Commission proposes that the Council approves, after having received consent from the European Parliament, the Agreement with the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020.