Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2017)826 - Amending regulation 1303/2013 on common provisions for EU funds (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD, EMFF) as regards support to structural reforms in Member States

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.



1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Reasons for and objectives of the proposal

Appropriate national policies are essential for the smooth functioning of a more integrated Economic and Monetary Union. Since many critical policy areas that are decisive remain primarily in the hands of the Member States, their coordination and the sequencing of reforms is essential to maximise their effectiveness, not only at national level, but also at EU level.

Under the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework, the Commission intends to propose a new reform delivery tool for Member States committing to reforms discussed at EU level and agreed in so-called reform commitments. It would have its own budgetary endowment, separate from and in addition to the European Structural and Investment Funds, which would retain their own set of rules and conditionalities.

The European Semester should remain the core vehicle for further steps towards stronger convergence and more effective coordination of such policies. This new tool should be set up with a view to support Member States in implementing structural reforms identified in the European Semester process, and ensure Member State ownership of these reforms.

This new reform delivery tool would seek to support a broad range of reforms. The focus should be on those reforms which can contribute most to the resilience of domestic economies and have positive spill-over effects on other Member States. These include reforms in product and labour markets, tax reforms, the development of capital markets, reforms to improve the business environment as well as investment in human capital and public administration reforms.

The Commission intends to test the main features of this reform delivery tool in a pilot phase for the period 2018-2020, by offering the possibility to Member States to use all or part of the performance reserve in the current European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds to support reforms instead of specific projects. To this end, the Commission proposes amendments to the Regulation (EU) 1303/2013 (Common Provisions Regulation) accordingly.

It should be recalled that a link between the European Semester priorities and the Union budget has already been established for the programming period 2014-2020, notably by introducing ex-ante and macro-economic conditionalities for the European Structural and Investment Funds.

Under today's proposal, such a link is further strengthened by allowing Member States to use all or part of the performance reserve set up in Articles 20 – 22 of the Common Provisions Regulation for cohesion policy to support structural reforms.

The reforms to be supported would be identified in multiannual reform commitment packages presented and monitored through the National Reform Programmes. The reform commitments would be defined by the Member States themselves and would include a set of reform measures with clear milestones and targets.

The Commission would then adopt a decision, by means of an implementing act, setting out these reform commitments and the amount allocated from the performance reserve for their support. This amount would be proportionate to the nature and importance of the reform. The monitoring and reporting on the implementation of its different milestones would be part of the European Semester. National Reform Programmes would be the source of information on progress and should provide information on steps towards reform completion.

The annual Country Reports produced by the Commission's services as part of the European Semester would provide an updated assessment of the reform progress, on the basis of which the award of support under this tool will be decided by the Commission. Support would be paid in full once the Member State has fully implemented the reform commitment.

Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

The proposal is consistent with the overall legal framework established for the European Structural and Investment Funds and is limited to a targeted amendment of the Common Provisions Regulation.

Consistency with other Union policies

The proposal is limited to a targeted amendment of the Common Provisions Regulation and maintains consistency with other Union policies. The new structural support instrument would be complementary to the voluntary technical support provided via the Structural Reform Support Programme (SRSP). The reform commitments could also include areas for which technical support from the SRSP would be requested from the Commission. Request for such technical support would remain voluntary.

2.

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY


Legal basis

The Common Provisions Regulation defines the common rules applicable to the European Structural and Investment Funds . Based on the principle of shared management between the Commission and the Member States, this Regulation includes provisions for the programming process as well as arrangements for programme (including financial) management, monitoring, financial control and evaluation of projects.

The proposal creates an option for Member States to allocate the performance reserve referred to in Articles 20 to 22 to structural reform support on the basis of reform commitments, and defines the mechanisms for implementing reform commitments.

3.

Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)


The proposal complies within the subsidiarity principle to the extent that it provides continued increased support through cohesion policy for certain Member States which opt for the use of the performance reserve for structural reform support. This mechanisms needs to be established at European level.

4.

Proportionality


The proposal is a limited and targeted change not going beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective of providing support to reforms in Member States.

5.

Choice of the instrument


Proposed instrument: amendment of the current regulation.

The Commission has explored the scope for manoeuvre provided by the legal framework and considers it necessary, in the light of experience, to propose modifications to Regulation (EU) 1303/2013.

6.

3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS


Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation

There was no ex-post evaluation/or fitness checks of the existing legislation.

7.

Stakeholder consultations


There was no consultation of external stakeholders

Collection and use of expertise

Use of external expertise has not been necessary.

8.

Impact assessment


n/a

Regulatory fitness and simplification

This is not an initiative within the Regulatory Fitness Programme (REFIT).

9.

Fundamental rights


The proposal has no consequences for the protection of fundamental rights.

1.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS



There is no impact on commitment appropriations since no modification is proposed to the maximum amounts of European Structural and Investment Funds financing provided for in the operational programmes for the programming period 2014-2020. It should be noted that the proposed modification does not imply any changes in the Multiannual Financial Framework annual ceilings for commitments and payments, which are set out in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1311/2013.

10.

5. OTHER ELEMENTS


Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements

Not applicable. The existing delivery systems for direct management of the European Structural and Investment Funds can be used to monitor the implementation of this proposal.

11.

Explanatory documents (for directives)


Not applicable

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal

Article 1 will be modified to explain that the Common Provisions Regulation also covers support to structural reforms identified in the European Semester process. The term structural reform is clarified in a dedicated definition included in Article 2.

Article 4(7) is modified to clarify that the structural reform support will not fall under shared management, but under direct management (financing not linked to cost as set out in Article 121(1)(e) of the revised Financial Regulation), and not require national co-financing.

In Article 15, a new point is added to explain that the partnership agreements also need to contain information on the re-allocation of the performance reserve to structural reform support.

Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 is proposed to be be modified to allow Member States to allocate the performance reserve partially or fully to any of the following:

a. to programmes and priorities which have achieved their milestones in accordance with paragraphs two to seven under the existing performance framework,

12.

b. to support for structural reforms


The modalities for requesting structural reform support are included in a new paragraph 8 in Article 22.

A new funding mechanism for support to structural reforms in the form of financing not linked to cost is proposed in Article 23a of this Regulation. It contains the rules for establishing reform commitments and the conditions for the disbursement of the support to Member States once the agreed reform commitments are met.

The amendment to Article 91 clarifies that all or part of the performance reserve which is included in the overall amounts for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), and the Cohesion Fund may be allocated to support for structural reforms as referred to in Article 23a.