Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2017)182 - Extension of the entitlement to co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement with Korea

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.



1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Reasons for and objectives of the proposal

The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and its Member States and South Korea was signed on 6 October 2010 and has been concluded in 2015 by adopting the Council Decision 2015/2169 on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part ("the Decision"). The Protocol on Cultural Cooperation (hereafter: the Protocol), concluded by the Parties within the framework of the FTA, established a framework within which the Parties shall cooperate to facilitate exchanges in cultural activities, goods and services, including in the audio-visual sector, and to improve the conditions governing such exchanges.

This entitlement was initially established for a period of three years (from 1 July 2011 until 30 June 2014). It was renewed for another three years until 30 June 2017 by the Council Implementing Decision 2014/226/EU as regards the extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part. It is now proposed that this entitlement be renewed for another three years.

Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

With the Protocol, the Parties, in conformity with their respective legislation, agreed inter alia to grant an entitlement for audio-visual co-productions between producers from the EU party and Korea to benefit from their respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content according to certain specific conditions.

Such co-productions can be considered European works within the EU and Korean works within Korea, as long as they respect the conditions stipulated in Article 5 of the Protocol (see points 8(a) to (c) in particular).

The Creative Europe MEDIA sub-programme supports the development and distribution of European audiovisual works from participating European countries. Beneficiaries from third countries may participate under certain schemes if certain conditions are met.

Certain schemes help create an environment conducive to co-productions, notably the Market Access and Training schemes which fund markets, networking meetings and workshops, including with Korea. In addition, the International Co-productions scheme helps European and international co-production partners, including from Korea, to come together and provides indirect support for audio-visual works co-produced by international co- production funds.

Consistency with other Union policies

The Protocol on Cultural Cooperation was concluded by the EU and Korea in 2015 as part of the Free Trade Agreement. Specifically, it was seen as an instrument to promote the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Convention of 2005 on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.

The existing entitlement foresees co-productions supported by groupings of national schemes and funds for audio-visual productions. The entitlement also allows the co-produced works to qualify as European works under the definition of European works referred to in Article 1 (n) (ii) in the Audio Visual Media Service Directive (AVMSD).

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY

Legal basis

The procedure for renewing the entitlement is provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol. The required steps have been taken.

Article 5(8) of the Protocol stipulates that if it is decided that the entitlement should be renewed, it can be extended for another three year period and, thereafter, it will be automatically renewed for further successive periods of the same duration unless a Party terminates the entitlement by giving notice in writing of at least three months before the expiry of the period. Co-productions which predate any such termination can still benefit from the respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content.

Given the specific circumstances and political sensitivity of the cooperation in this area, it is opportune to make a proposal for a Council Decision on the renewal of the entitlement. Such proposal should be based on Article 218(6) TFEU as it concerns the extension in time of the application of a part of an international agreement. The rules regarding the manner in which the EU institutions arrive at their decisions are laid down in the Treaties and are not at the disposal of the Member States or of the institutions themselves. Council Decisions concluding international agreements cannot derogate from the Treaties as regards the procedure to extend in time obligations arising from international agreements which are thereby concluded.

Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)

A second renewal of the entitlement will represent an opportunity for the European audiovisual industry to maintain its presence and further gain market share, experience and knowledge in the Korean market, which is growing fast.

Whilst some Member States have successfully undertaken audiovisual co-productions on a bilateral basis, many others still have not and therefore the entitlement at EU level still has the potential to allow for participation by a wider number of countries.

The European Commission has limited competences regarding production of films whereas this is the role of national film funds, including as regards international co-productions. Therefore, more engagement of the national film funds will be necessary in order to implement the protocol in practice.

Proportionality

Studies and data from the European Audiovisual Observatory have shown that co-productions lead to higher audiences. Since 2009, EU films in Korea (in cinemas) have achieved 5% of market share in terms of audiences and 20% in terms of releases. Korean films in the EU have achieved 1% in terms of audiences and 2% in terms of releases. Therefore implementation of the coproduction entitlement would help build market share at a time when the market is growing (total admissions in Korea increased by 41% since 2011).

The lack of implementation of the protocol so far seems due to a lack of concrete information about the incentives available for co-productions at national level. Therefore targeted measures should be taken (covering access to funding, training, network building), both at European and national level.

Also, the success of bilateral co-productions shows there is the capacity and potential to do more. In preliminary discussions in the Audiovisual Working Party, Member States have indicated they would be willing to collaborate at European level in order to promote co-productions under the European protocol, drawing on best practices at bilateral level.

The renewal of the entitlement is necessary to allow these measures to be taken.

Choice of the instrument

. Any explicit decision of the entitlement needs a Council Decision, based on Article 218(6) TFEU as it concerns the extension in time of the application of a part of an international agreement.

3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation

Not applicable.

Stakeholder consultations

The Protocol foresaw that each Party establish a Domestic Advisory Group (DAG), comprised of cultural and audio-visual representatives active in the fields covered by this Protocol. The EU DAG met on 5 September 2016 in Brussels in order to evaluate the results of the implementation of the entitlement in terms of enhancement of cultural diversity and mutually beneficial cooperation on co-produced works.

The DAG noted the lack of EU-Korea audio-visual co-productions under the conditions mentioned in the Protocol, but agreed that the Protocol has nonetheless the potential of being a useful tool. It was open to the renewal of the entitlement for EU-Korean co-productions although there were some reservations about its added value in practice, which had to be made clearer to operators. The Commission has disseminated general information about the protocol but more operational and detailed information for professionals is required. The DAG also concluded that there is a need to promote the Protocol at industry, state and EU level in order to highlight the advantages.

The entitlement to audio-visual co-productions was discussed with the EU Member States at a meeting of the Cultural Affairs Committee of the Council of the European Union on 3 October 2016. The Member States signalled their willingness to collaborate more at European level to promote co-productions.

It is following the consultation of the Member States and in light of the opinion of the DAG that the Commission is now invited to endorse that the entitlement should be renewed.

Collection and use of expertise

Studies and data from the European Audiovisual Observatory regarding co-productions have been referred to.

• Impact assessment

Not applicable.

Regulatory fitness and simplification

Not applicable.

Fundamental rights

Not applicable.

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

None.

5. OTHER ELEMENTS


Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements

The Commission will continuously monitor the implementation of the audiovisual co-production entitlement, drawing on data from the European Audiovisual Observatory and from industry, in particular as regards the animation sector.

Once a year a Cultural Cooperation Committee will meet between the European Union and the Member States on one side and the Republic of Korea on the other to monitor progress and discuss challenges and opportunities.

Explanatory documents (for directives)

Not applicable.

Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal

The entitlement will be extended for another three years, until June 2020. The entitlement is set out in Article 5 of the Protocol, as follows.

For the purposes of this Protocol, a co-production means an audiovisual work produced by producers of both Korea and the EU Party into which those producers have invested in accordance with the terms of this Protocol.

The Parties shall encourage the negotiation of new and implementation of existing co-production agreements between one or several Member States of the European Union and Korea. The Parties reaffirm that the Member States of the European Union and Korea may grant financial benefits to co-produced audiovisual works as defined in relevant existing or future bilateral co-production agreements to which one or several Member States of the European Union and Korea are parties.

The Parties, in conformity with their respective legislation, shall facilitate co-productions between producers from the EU Party and Korea, including through entitlement for co- productions to benefit from respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content.

Co-produced audiovisual works shall be entitled to benefit from EU Party scheme for the promotion of local/regional cultural content referred in the form of qualification as European works in accordance with Article 1(n)(i) of Directive 89/552/EEC as amended by Directive 2007/65/EC, or by its subsequent amendments for the purposes of the requirements for the promotion of audiovisual works as provided for by Articles 4.1 and 3i.1 of Directive 89/552/EEC as amended by Directive 2007/65/EC, or by its subsequent amendments.

Co-produced audiovisual works shall be entitled to benefit from Korean schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content referred to in paragraph 3 in the form of qualification as Korean works for the purposes of Article 40 of the Promotion of Motion Pictures and Video Products Act (Act No. 9676, May 21, 2009), or its subsequent amendments and of Article 71 of the Broadcasting Act (Act No. 9280, Dec. 31, 2008), or its subsequent amendments and Notice on Programming Ratio (Korea Communications Commission Notice No. 2008-135, Dec. 31, 2008), or its subsequent amendments.

1.

The entitlement for co-productions to benefit from the respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content shall be granted on the following conditions:


(a) The co-produced audiovisual works are realised between undertakings which are owned and continue to be owned, whether directly or by majority participation, by a Member State of the European Union or Korea respectively and/or by nationals of a Member State of the European Union or nationals of Korea respectively;

(b) The representative director(s) or manager(s) of the co- producing undertakings have the nationality of a Member State of the European Union and Korea respectively and can demonstrate their domicile therein;

(c) Participation of producers from two Member States of the European Union will be necessary for each co-produced audiovisual work, other than animation works. With respect to animation works participation of producers from three Member States of the European Union will be necessary. The proportion of financial contribution of a producer or producers of each Member State of the European Union shall be no less than 10 percent;

(d) The minimum respective financial contributions to a co-produced audiovisual work other than animation works, of the producers of the EU Party (taken together) and the producers of Korea (taken together) may not be less than 30 percent of the total production cost of the audiovisual work. With respect to animation works this contribution may not be less than 35 percent of the total production cost;

(e) The contribution of each Party’s producers (taken together) includes effective technical and artistic participation and a balance is ensured between the two Parties’ contributions. In particular, in co-produced audiovisual works other than animation works the technical and artistic contribution of each Party’s producers (taken together) shall not vary by more than 20 percentage points compared to their financial contribution and cannot in any case represent more than 70 percent of the overall contribution. With respect to animation works the technical and artistic contribution of each Party’s producers (taken together) shall not vary by more than 10 percentage points compared to their financial contribution and cannot in any case represent more than 65 percent of the overall contribution;

(f) Participation of producers from third countries that have ratified the UNESCO Convention in a co-produced audiovisual work is accepted to a maximum of 20 percent, where possible, of the total production costs and/or the technical and artistic contribution to the audiovisual work.

These conditions aim to ensure the European character of the co-productions, by having at least two Member States, and to ensure a fair balance in the costs and benefits of the co-production for the parties. Therefore there is a minimum financial contribution for the parties whilst the technical and artistic contribution, which consists of professional inputs and therefore represents employment opportunities, should not be 10% more than the financial contribution. The requirements for animation works are higher due to the sensitivity of the sector, which requires more technical inputs and where cost differentials between the EU and Kore could be more significant.

The Parties reaffirm that the entitlement for co- productions to benefit from their respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content ensures reciprocal benefits, and that the co-productions fulfilling the criteria are awarded the status of European/Korean works respectively without any additional conditions.

The entitlement for co-productions to benefit from the respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content is established for a period of three years