Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2014)81 - EU position as regards the extension of the entitlement to co-productions as provided for in the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation with Korea

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the European Union and its Member States and South Korea[1] has been provisionally applied since July 2011. The Protocol on Cultural Cooperation (hereafter: the Protocol), concluded by the Parties within the framework of the FTA, established a framework within which the Parties shall cooperate to facilitate exchanges in cultural activities, goods and services, including in the audio-visual sector, and to improve the conditions governing such exchanges.

By derogation from the institutional provisions of the FTA, the Trade Committee shall have no jurisdiction over the Protocol. Instead the Committee on Cultural Cooperation, established within the framework of the Protocol and comprising senior officials from within the administration of each Party, shall exercise all functions of the Trade Committee as regards the Protocol, where such functions are relevant for the purposes of implementing the Protocol. The Committee on Cultural Cooperation met for the first time on 5 December 2013 in Brussels and the Parties on that occasion shared information on their respective legal bases and cultural activities.

With the Protocol, the Parties, in conformity with their respective legislation, agreed inter alia to grant an entitlement for audio-visual co-productions between producers from the EU party and Korea to benefit from their respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content according to certain specific conditions. Such co-productions can be considered European works within the EU and Korean works within Korea, as long as they respect the conditions stipulated in Article 5 of the Protocol (see points 8(a) to (c) in particular). This entitlement was established for a period of three years (from 1 July 2011 until 30 June 2014) and it is now proposed that this entitlement be renewed for another three years.

1.

RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS



The Protocol foresaw that each Party establish a Domestic Advisory Group (DAG), comprised of cultural and audio-visual representatives active in the fields covered by this Protocol. The EU DAG met on 25 September 2013 in Brussels in order to evaluate the results of the implementation of the entitlement in terms of enhancement of cultural diversity and mutually beneficial cooperation on co-produced works.

The DAG noted the lack of EU-Korea audio-visual co-productions under the conditions mentioned in the Protocol, agreed that the Protocol has nonetheless the potential of being a useful tool, and recommended that the entitlement for EU-Korean co-productions be extended for three more years. The DAG also concluded that there is a need to promote the Protocol at industry, state and EU level if the entitlement is to be properly exploited. 

The entitlement to audio-visual co-productions was discussed with the EU Member States at a meeting of the Cultural Affairs Committee of the Council of the European Union on 31 October 2013. It is following the consultation of the Member States and in light of the opinion of the DAG that the Commission is now proposing that the entitlement be extended for another three-year period.

2.

LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL



The procedure for renewing the entitlement is provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol. The required steps have been taken, as detailed above.

Article 5(8) of the Protocol stipulates that if it is decided that the entitlement should be renewed, it can be extended for another three year period and, thereafter, it will be automatically renewed for further successive periods of the same duration unless a Party terminates the entitlement by giving notice in writing of at least three months before the expiry of the period. Co-productions which predate any such termination can still benefit from the respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content.

According to article 4.1 of Council Decision 2011/265/EU a Council Decision is required for this proposed renewal of the entitlement to be enacted.

3.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION


N/A

5. OPTIONAL ELEMENTS N/A