Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2012)661 - Amendment of Decision 2010/39/EU authorising Portugal to continue to derogate from Articles 168, 193 and 250 of the VAT Directive - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2012)661 - Amendment of Decision 2010/39/EU authorising Portugal to continue to derogate from Articles 168, 193 and 250 of the VAT ... |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2012)661  |
| date | 14-11-2012 |
Grounds for and objectives of the proposal
Pursuant to Article 395(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to apply special measures derogating from the Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.
By letter registered with the Commission on 18 April 2012 the Portuguese Republic requested an authorisation to continue applying a measure derogating from Articles 168, 193 and 250 of Directive 2006/112/EC, in order to apply a special optional scheme for doorstep sales.
In accordance with Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 1 June 2012 of the request made by the Portuguese Republic. The Commission notified the Portuguese Republic by letter dated 6 June 2012 that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
General context
Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC provides that a taxable person is entitled to deduct the VAT charged on purchases made for the purpose of his taxed transactions. Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC provides that the VAT shall be payable by any taxable person carrying out a taxable supply of goods or services, except where it is payable by another person in the cases referred to in Articles 194 to 199 and Article 202. Article 250(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC provides that every taxable person shall submit a VAT return setting out all the information needed to calculate the tax that has become chargeable and the deductions to be made including, in so far as is necessary for the establishment of the basis of assessment, the total value of the transactions relating to such tax and deductions and the value of any exempt transactions.
The measure pursued by the Portuguese Republic however deviates from the abovementioned provisions. This special optional scheme concerns firms active in the doorstep sales sector who meet specific conditions and are authorised by the competent tax authorities to apply that scheme. The firms in question make use of interposed resellers by selling their products directly to those resellers who, in turn, sell the same products directly to the final consumers.
By way of derogation from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC, those firms to which the scheme applies are made liable for the VAT borne on their resellers' supplies of goods to final consumers. By way of derogation from Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC, those firms are given the right to deduct the VAT payable or paid by their resellers for the corresponding goods that have been supplied to them. By way of derogation from Article 250 of Directive 2006/112/EC, the resellers' obligation to submit a VAT return relating to the goods which the authorised firms have supplied to them and the supply of those goods to the final consumers, is transferred to the authorised firm.
Only such firms may be authorised to use that special scheme whose total turnover is derived from doorstep sales made by resellers acting in their own name and on their own account, provided that all products sold by the firm appear in a pre-established list of the prices applicable at the final consumption stage and the firm sells its products directly to resellers who, in turn, sell it directly to final consumers.
The derogating measure of the Portuguese Republic had initially been granted by Council Decision 2004/738/EC[1] for a period until 31 December 2009 and was again granted by Council Decision 2010/39/EU[2] until 31 December 2012.
In its current request, the Portuguese Republic informed the Commission that the reasons pursuant to which the Council has taken its Decision 2010/39/EU are still valid and explained that the special measure is being applied until now and has proved to be very useful in terms of simplifying the VAT collection and maintaining a more effective VAT control in this sector.
Derogations are in general granted for a limited time as to allow an assessment whether the special measure is appropriate and effective. In this respect, based on the information provided by the Portuguese Republic, the Commission understands that the special measure in question provides a facilitation to both tax administrations and businesses as it mainly concerns very small taxpayers without the appropriate structure or organisational capacity to comply with the requirements laid down in VAT law. The amount of tax due at the level of final consumption is only affected to a negligible extent. An extension of the derogating measure is therefore appropriate.
However, any extension should be limited in time in order to assess whether the conditions, on which the derogations are based, would still be valid. Therefore, it is proposed to extend the derogation until the end of 2015 and to request the Portuguese Republic to present, together with the extension request, a report by 1 April 2015 at the latest including a review of the application of the special measure in case a further extension would be envisaged beyond 2015.
Existing provisions in the area of the proposal
Not applicable.
Consistency with other policies and objectives of the Union
Not applicable.
Contents
Consultation of interested parties
Not relevant.
Collection and use of expertise
There was no need for external expertise.
Impact assessment
The proposal is designed to simplify the procedure for charging tax and has, therefore, a potential positive impact for both businesses and administrations. The solution has been identified by the Portuguese Republic as a suitable measure.
Summary of the proposed action
The proposal aims to authorise the Portuguese Republic to continue to apply a measure derogating from Articles 168, 193 and 250 of Directive 2006/112/EC so as to allow for imposing on certain authorised firms the liability for the VAT borne on supplies of goods to final consumers made by interposed resellers, granting those authorised firms the right to deduct the VAT payable or paid by the resellers for the respective purchase of those goods and transferring to the authorised firms the resellers' obligation to submit a VAT return linked to the supplies of those goods from the authorised firms to the resellers and from the resellers to the final consumers.
The application and the necessity for the derogating measure are to be reviewed and reported on by the Portuguese Republic upon any request for an extension. The Decision will expire on the date specified therein.
Legal basis
Article 395(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax.
Subsidiarity principle
The proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Union. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply.
Proportionality principle
The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons:
This Decision concerns an authorisation granted to a Member State on its own request and does not constitute any obligation.
Given the narrow scope of the derogation, the special measure is proportionate to the aim pursued.
Choice of instruments
Proposed instruments: Council Decision.
Other means would not be adequate for the following reasons:
Under Article 395 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC, a derogation from the common VAT rules is only possible upon authorization of the Council acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission. A Council Decision is the only suitable instrument since it can be addressed to an individual Member State.
The proposal will not adversely affect the Union's own resources from VAT.
5. OPTIONAL ELEMENTS
The proposal includes a review clause and a sunset clause.