Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2012)201 - Amendment of Council Decision 2000/125/EC on the Agreement concerning global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts for wheeled vehicles

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

· Grounds for and objectives of the proposal

At international level, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) develops harmonised requirements, intended to remove technical barriers to the trade in motor vehicles between the Contracting Parties to the Revised 1958 Agreement and to ensure that such vehicles offer a high level of safety and environmental protection.

The objective of this proposal is to simplify and expedite the procedure regarding the voting of UNECE Regulations by the Commission on behalf of the Union, hence reducing the delay in the adoption of these acts in the framework of the UNECE. This is important as the EU vehicle type-approval system currently relies more and more on UNECE Regulations, which are replacing EU legislation (see Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 on General Safety[1]). In addition, quicker adoption of legislation will allow for faster responses to regulatory requests from the operators.

Furthermore, the changes to the Treaties occurred after the adoption of Council Decision 97/836/EC, in particular the adoption of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, have substantially altered the decision making procedure to be followed for the establishment of the position of the Union when voting Regulations to be adopted by the UNECE and the conclusion of agreements between the Union and international organisations, making it necessary to adapt those Decisions to the new procedures.

The present proposal therefore aims at adapting Council Decision 2000/125/EC to the decision making procedures regarding international agreements set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

· General context

By Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles ("Parallel Agreement")[2] the Union has acceded to the Parallel Agreement, in the framework of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).

That Decision should be amended to reflect the changes introduced by the TFEU to the decision making procedure to be followed for the establishment of the position of the Union when voting Regulations to be adopted by the UNECE and the conclusion of agreements between the Union and international organisations.

· Existing provisions in the area of the proposal

By Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles ("Parallel Agreement")[3] the Union has acceded to the Parallel Agreement.

· Consistency with the other policies and objectives of the Union

The proposal is in line with the objectives of the common trade policy in accordance with Article 217 TFEU. The participation of the Union at the work of the UNECE helps developing and strengthening the international harmonisation of vehicle-related technical regulations, contributing to facilitate international trade in motor vehicles. The 1958 Agreement plays a key role in this objective since manufacturers can operate a common set of type-approval standards knowing that their products will be recognised by many countries on different continents as being in conformity with their national legislation. International regulatory harmonisation is thus one of the most effective means to prevent obstacles to trade.

1.

RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS



· Consultation of interested parties

In developing the proposal the European Commission has consulted stakeholders, in the framework of the Technical Committee – Motor Vehicles. · Impact assessment No Impact Assessment was conducted for this proposal.

2.

LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL



· Summary of the proposed action

The proposal amends Council Decision 2000/125/EC to reflect the changes introduced by the TFEU to the decision making procedure to be followed for the establishment of the position of the Union when voting Regulations to be adopted by the UNECE and the conclusion of agreements between the Union and international organisations.

· Legal basis

Considering the legal basis for the Council act being amended was Articles 95 and 133 in conjunction with Article 300(2), first sentence, Article 300(3), second subparagraph, of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the legal basis of the proposal is Article 207(3) in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

· Subsidiarity principle

The vote in favour of international instruments like draft UNECE Regulations and their incorporation into the Union system for the type-approval of motor vehicles can only be done by the Union. This does not only prevent fragmentation of the Internal Market, but also ensures equal health and safety standards across the EU. It also offers advantages of economies of scale: products can be made for the whole European market and even the international market, instead of being customised to obtain national type-approval for every single Member State.

The proposal therefore complies with the subsidiarity principle.

· Proportionality principle

The proposal complies with the proportionality principle as it does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives of ensuring the proper functioning of the Internal Market while at the same time providing for a high level of public safety and protection.

· Choice of instruments

Proposed instrument: Council Decision.

The use of a Council Decision is considered to be appropriate as in line with the requirements of Article 218(6) TFEU.

3.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION



The proposal has no implication for the Union budget.

5. OPTIONAL ELEMENTS

· European Economic Area

The proposed act does not concern an EEA matter and should therefore not extend to the European Economic Area.