Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2011)29 - Coordination of safeguards which are required by Member States of companies for the protection of the interests of members and others
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2011)29 - Coordination of safeguards which are required by Member States of companies for the protection of the interests of members ... |
---|---|
source | COM(2011)29 ![]() |
date | 01-02-2011 |
2. In its opinion of 16 October 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
3. On 26 August 2010 the Commission presented an amended proposal3 for the codification of Directive 77/91/EEC, following subsequent amendments to it.
4. In its further opinion of 12 October 2010 the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services has stated that that amended proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
5. In that opinion the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services also acknowledged that Article 64 of Directive 77/91/EEC, which corresponds to Article 65 in the proposed codified text, established a secondary legal basis. In the light of the judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 May 2008 in Case C-133/06, it was considered necessary to redraft Article 66 of the proposed codified text. Since such a redrafting would imply a substantive change, and would therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 8 7 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts - be applied, in the light of the Joint declaration on that point 8.
6. The amendment to be made to Article 69 of the proposed codified text concerns the insertion of the words ' the European Parliament and ' before the words ' the Council ', in order to confer on both institutions the competence to examine and, if need be, revise the amount referred to in Article 610.
7. It is therefore appropriate to transform the codification of Directive 77/91/EEC into a recast in order to incorporate the necessary amendment.
ê 77/91/EEC (adapted)
- 1.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 2.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 3.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 4.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 5.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 6.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 7." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 8.' The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission note that if it should appear necessary to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, the Commission will be able to choose, case by case, whether to recast its proposal or whether to submit a separate proposal for amendment, leaving its codification proposal on the table, and then, once the substantive change has been adopted, incorporate it into the proposal for codification '.
- 9.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 10.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 11.OJ C
- 12.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 13.See Annex II, Part A.
- 14.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 15.OJ L 65, 14.3.1968, p. 8.
- 16.OJ L 258, 1.10.2009, p. 11.
- 17.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 18.OJ L 96, 12.4.2003, p. 16.
- 19.OJ L 336, 23.12.2003, p. 33.
- 20.OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 70.
- 21.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 22.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 23.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 24.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 25.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 26.OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
- 27.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 28.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 29.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 30.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 31.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 32.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 33.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 34.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 35.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 36.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 37.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 38.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 39.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 40.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 41.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 42.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 43.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 44.OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87.
- 45.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 46.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 47.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 48.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 49.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 50.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 51.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 52.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 53.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 54.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 55.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 56.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 57.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 58.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 59.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 60.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 61.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 62.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 63.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 64.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 65.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 66.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 67.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 68.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 69.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 70.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 71.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 72.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 73.OJ L 193, 18.7.1983, p. 1.
- 74.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 75.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 76.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 77.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 78.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 79.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 80.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 81.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 82.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 83.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 84." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 85.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 86." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 87.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 88.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 89." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 90.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 91.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 92." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 93.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 94." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 95." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 96.' The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission note that if it should appear necessary to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, the Commission will be able to choose, case by case, whether to recast its proposal or whether to submit a separate proposal for amendment, leaving its codification proposal on the table, and then, once the substantive change has been adopted, incorporate it into the proposal for codification '.
- 97.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 98.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 99.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 100.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 101.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 102.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 103.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 104.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 105.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 106.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 107.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 108.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 109.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 110.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 111.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 112.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 113.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 114.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 115.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 116.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 117.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 118.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 119.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 120.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 121.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 122.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 123.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 124.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 125.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 126.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 127.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 128.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 129.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 130.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 131.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 132.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 133.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 134.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 135.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 136.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 137.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 138.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 139.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 140.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 141.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 142.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 143.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 144.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 145.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 146." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 147.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 148.' The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission note that if it should appear necessary to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, the Commission will be able to choose, case by case, whether to recast its proposal or whether to submit a separate proposal for amendment, leaving its codification proposal on the table, and then, once the substantive change has been adopted, incorporate it into the proposal for codification '.
- 149.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 150.OJ C
- 151.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 152." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 153.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 154." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 155.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 156." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 157.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 158.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 159.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 160.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 161.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 162.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 163.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 164.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 165.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 166.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 167.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 168.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 169.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 170.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 171.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 172.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 173." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 174.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 175." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 176.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 177.' The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission note that if it should appear necessary to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, the Commission will be able to choose, case by case, whether to recast its proposal or whether to submit a separate proposal for amendment, leaving its codification proposal on the table, and then, once the substantive change has been adopted, incorporate it into the proposal for codification '.
- 178.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 179.OJ C
- 180.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 181.OJ C
- 182.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 183.OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1.
- 184.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 185.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 186.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 187.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 188.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 189.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 190.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 191." Should it prove necessary during the legislative process to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, it will be the Commission's responsibility to submit any proposal(s), where appropriate ".
- 192.' The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission note that if it should appear necessary to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, the Commission will be able to choose, case by case, whether to recast its proposal or whether to submit a separate proposal for amendment, leaving its codification proposal on the table, and then, once the substantive change has been adopted, incorporate it into the proposal for codification '.
- 193.' The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission note that if it should appear necessary to go beyond straightforward codification and make substantive changes, the Commission will be able to choose, case by case, whether to recast its proposal or whether to submit a separate proposal for amendment, leaving its codification proposal on the table, and then, once the substantive change has been adopted, incorporate it into the proposal for codification '.
- 194.OJ C
- 195.OJ C
- 196.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 197.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 198.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 199.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 200.COM(2008) 544 final.
- 201.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.
- 202.COM(2010) 388 final.
- 203.OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p. 2.