r) - Main contents

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

dossier	COM(2001)256 - Amendment of for the twenty third time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of ...
source	COM(2001)256
date	14-05-2001

1. INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT

European Parliament and Council Directive 94/60/EC amending for the fourteenth time Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations i adds a list of substances classified as category 1 or 2 carcinogens, mutagens or substances toxic to reproduction (c/m/r) to Annex I of Directive 76/769/EEC i. It stipulates that these substances may not be used in substances or preparations placed on the market for sale to the general public. The c/m/r-classification of these substances has been defined in Annex I of Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances i. This Annex is regularly updated by way of adaptation to technical progress.

Directive 94/60/EC also invites the Commission to submit further proposals to the European Parliament and Council to add additional c/m/r substances to Annex I of Directive 76/769/EEC no later than six months after the publication of new classifications as c/m/r (categories 1 and 2) in the framework of Council Directive 67/548/EEC. The European Parliament and Council Directive 97/56/EC i, 16th amendment to Directive 76/769/EEC, updates and consolidates the Appendix of c/m/r-substances to Annex I to the Directive.

Commission Directive 98/98/EC i, 25th adaptation to Directive 67/548/EEC, added 13 substances newly classified as carcinogenic category 2, 3 substances newly classified as mutagenic category 2, and 7 substances newly classified as toxic to reproduction category 2 to Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC and Commission Directive 2000/32/EC i, 26th adaptation to Directive 67/548/EEC, added 1 substance newly classified as carcinogenic category 2 and 1 substance newly classified as toxic to reproduction category 2. It is proposed to add these substances to the appendix to points 29, 30 and 31 respectively.

2. JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSAL

What are the objectives of the proposal in relation to the Community's obligations-

Within the framework for action in the field of public health, the European Parliament and the Council have adopted an action plan to combat cancer (Decision n° 646/96/EC i). Due to the fact that use of chemicals by consumers cannot be controlled, safety can only be ensured by prohibiting use by consumers of c/m/r substances and preparations. Following the adoption of the Directive 94/60/EC the Commission is invited to propose measures governing substances newly classified as c/m/r categories 1 or 2.

The aim of the proposal is to preserve the Internal Market. When Member States adopt national provisions restricting the marketing and use of c/m/r substances and preparations there will be obstacles to trade because of different development of national legislation. It is therefore necessary to improve the conditions for the functioning of the Internal Market to the benefit of the protection of the health and safety of consumers.

What are the courses of action available to the Community-

The only course of action available is a proposal for an amendment to Directive 76/769/EEC, the twenty third amendment, providing for harmonised rules on the use of substances and preparations classified as category 1 or 2 c/m/r's.

Are uniform rules necessary- Is it not sufficient to establish targets to be implemented by Member States-

The proposed twenty third amendment establishes uniform rules for the circulation of substances and preparations classified as c/m/r. It also guarantees a high level of protection of health and safety of consumers. The proposed twenty third amendment is the only way to meet these goals. Targets would be insufficient.

3. RATIONALE OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposed twenty third amendment would extend the appendix of c/m/r substances to Annex I to Directive 76/769/EEC by adding the substances classified as c/m/r category 1 or category 2 in the 25th and 26th adaptations to technical progress of Directive 67/548/EEC. Use by consumers of all these substances is thus prohibited.

4. COSTS AND BENEFITS

4.1. Costs

The costs are estimated to be low due to the limited use of those substances by the general public.

4.2. Benefits

The proposed ban will ensure that the carcinogenic and mutagenic substances and substances toxic to reproduction and preparations are not placed on the market for consumer use either now or in the future. The benefit of the proposal is to protect the health of consumers.

5. PROPORTIONALITY

The twenty third amendment would yield benefits in terms of protecting the health of consumers. This would be achieved at low costs.

1. CONSULTATIONS

PERFORMED IN PREPARING THE DRAFT 23rd AMENDMENT

Advice on the preparation of the proposal was sought through several meetings involving experts from Member States and industry. Industry was represented by CEFIC (European Chemical Industry Council), CEPE (European Council of the Paint, Printing Ink and Artists' Colours Industry), Eurométaux and CONCAWE (the oil companies' European organisation for environment, health and safety.

7. CONFORMITY WITH THE TREATY

This proposal is intended to preserve the Internal Market and at the same time ensure a high level of protection of health of the consumers and is therefore in conformity with Article 95 i of the Treaty.

8. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

In compliance with Article 95 of the Treaty, the Codecision Procedure with the European Parliament is applicable. The Economic and Social Committee has to be consulted.